Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:08:26.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rostovtzeff's Twofold History of the Hellenistic World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

A feature of the new Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World by M. Rostovtzeff should not escape attention for its implications in a matter of historical method. This work—a κτῆμα ἐς αἰεί —contains, in fact, not one story, but two stories. What is called Summary and Epilogue (pp. 1026-1312) is in method and problems something completely different from the bulk of the study (ch. III-VII). Rostovtzeff, who is a historian of splendid intuition rather than of close reasoning, has obviously not perceived this fact. He has not clearly delimited the two subjects, thereby adding a difficulty to his critic, who runs the risk of being Over-schematic.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Sechs ungedruckte Aufsätze über das klassiche Alterium, 1896 (= Werke III, p. 171)Google Scholar.

2 Griechische Kulturgeschichte, IV 3, p. 573Google Scholar.

3 Apud Gercke-Norden, , Einleitung III, 2 ed. 1914, p. 140Google Scholar. Cf. Münzer, F., Die politische Vernichtung des Griechentums, 1925 (‘Erbe d. Alten,’ IX)Google Scholar.

4 CAH VII, 700Google Scholar.

5 For the history of the idea of Hellenism cf. my essay Genesi storica e funzione attuale del concetto di Ellenismo,’ Giornale Critico della Filosofia italiana, XVI, 1935, 1037Google Scholar. On Droysen also my article ‘Per il centenario dell’ Alessandro Magno di J. G. Droysen,’ Leonardo, Dec. 1933. Cf. the objections, which I cannot accept, by Hampl, F., Gnomon, 1937, 474Google Scholar.

6 Cf. the remark of Toynbee, A., A Study of History, I 2, p. 7Google Scholar. ‘Intrinsically the Seleucid Monarchy and not the Ptolemaic Monarchy is the field in which the pearl of great price awaits the historical explorer.’

7 Cf. now the important remarks by Walbank, F. W. in Class. Rev. LVI, 1942, 81–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 1925, p. 104. Cf. Tarn's note in Hellenistic Civilisation, 2 ed., p. 2Google Scholar.

9 Sherwin-White, A. N., The Roman Citizenship, 1939Google Scholar (cf. Journ. Rom. Studies, 1941, p. 158)Google Scholar.

10 Cf. my essay on Rostovtzeff, in La Nuova Italia, IV, 1933, 160–5Google Scholar.