We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh, Le remplacement de l'imparfait du subjonctif par le présent du subjonctif considéré dans une perspective de grammaticalisation. (Études Romanes, 60.) Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2010, 261 pp., 978 87 635 3131 3.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
01 October 2013
Department of English Language and LinguisticsSchool of European Culture and LanguagesRutherford CollegeUniversity of Kent Canterbury, CT2 [email protected]
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Andersen, H. (2001). Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In: Andersen, H. (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detges, U. and Waltereit, R. (2002). Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21.2: 151–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havu, E. (1996). De l'emploi du subjonctif passé. Helsinki: Akademia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar