Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T19:38:02.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nascent water waves induced by the impulsive motion of a solid wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Wladimir Sarlin*
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire FAST, F-91405 Orsay, France Laboratoire d’Hydrodynamique, CNRS, École polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France
Zhaodong Niu
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire FAST, F-91405 Orsay, France Laboratoire d’Hydrodynamique, CNRS, École polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France
Alban Sauret
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, MD, USA Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, MD, USA
Philippe Gondret
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire FAST, F-91405 Orsay, France
Cyprien Morize
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire FAST, F-91405 Orsay, France
*
Corresponding author: Wladimir Sarlin, [email protected]

Abstract

The description of the generation mechanism of impulse surface waves remains an important challenge in environmental fluid mechanics, owing to the need for a better understanding of large-scale phenomena such as landslide-generated tsunamis. In the present study, we investigated the generation phase of laboratory-scale water waves induced by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston, whose maximum velocity $U$ and total stroke $L$ are independently varied, as well as the initial liquid depth $h$. By doing so, the influence of two dimensionless numbers is studied: the Froude number $\mathrm {Fr}_p$ = $U/(gh)^{1/2}$, with $g$ the gravitational acceleration, and the relative stroke $\Lambda _p =L/h$ of the piston. During the constant acceleration phase of the vertical wall, a transient water bump forms and remains localised in the vicinity of the piston, for all investigated parameters. Experiments with a small relative acceleration $\gamma /g$, where $\gamma =U^2/L$, are well captured by a first-order potential flow theory established by Joo et al. (1990), which provides a fair estimate of the overall free surface elevation and the maximum wave amplitude reached at the contact with the piston. For large Froude numbers, however, wave breaking hinders the use of such an approach. In this case, an unsteady hydraulic jump theory is proposed, which accurately predicts the time evolution of the wave amplitude at the contact with the piston throughout the generation phase. At the end of the formation process, the dimensionless volume of the bump evolves linearly with $\Lambda _p$ and the wave aspect ratio is found to be governed, at first-order, by the relative acceleration $\gamma /g$. As the piston begins its constant deceleration, the water bump evolves into a propagating wave and several regimes such as dispersive, solitary-like and bore waves, as well as water jets are then reported and mapped in a phase diagram in the ($\mathrm {Fr}_p$, $\Lambda _p$) plane. While the transition from waves to water jets is observed if the typical acceleration of the piston is close enough to the gravitational acceleration $g$, the wave regimes are found to be mainly selected by the relative piston stroke $\Lambda _p$. On the other hand, the Froude number determines whether the generated wave breaks or not.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acheson, D.J. 1990 Elementary Fluid Dynamics. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Biésel, F. & Suquet, F. 1951 a Les appareils générateurs de houle en laboratoire. La Houille Blanche 2, 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biésel, F. & Suquet, F. 1951 b Les appareils générateurs de houle en laboratoire. La Houille Blanche 4, 475496.Google Scholar
Biésel, F. & Suquet, F. 1951 c Les appareils générateurs de houle en laboratoire. La Houille Blanche 5, 723737.Google Scholar
Cabrera, M.A., Pinzon, G., Take, W.A. & Mulligan, R.P. 2020 Wave generation across a continuum of landslide conditions from the collapse of partially submerged to fully submerged granular columns. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 125 (12), e2020JC016465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauchy, L.-A. 1827 Théorie de la propagation des ondes à la surface d’un fluide pesant d’une profondeur indéfinie. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des sciences de l’Institut de France 1, 13322.Google Scholar
Chwang, A.T. 1983 Nonlinear hydrodynamic pressure on an accelerating plate. Phys. Fluids 26 (2), 383387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwang, A.T. & Wang, K.H. 1984 Nonlinear impulsive force on an accelerating container. J. Fluids Engng 106 (2), 233240.Google Scholar
Darrigol, O. 2003 The spirited horse, the engineer, and the mathematician: water waves in nineteenth-century hydrodynamics. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 58 (1), 2195.Google Scholar
Darvenne, A., Viroulet, S. & Lacaze, L. 2024 Physical model of landslide-generated impulse waves: experimental investigation of the wave-granular flow coupling. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 129 (9), e2024JC021145.Google Scholar
Das, M.M. & Wiegel, R.L. 1972 Waves generated by horizontal motion of a wall. J. Waterways Harbors Coast. Engng Div. 98 (1), 4965.Google Scholar
Dauxois, T. & Peyrard, M. 2004 Physique des solitons. EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
Dias, F. & Ghidaglia, J.-M. 2018 Slamming: recent progress in the evaluation of impact pressures. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50 (2018), 243273.Google Scholar
Francis, V., Ramakrishnan, B., Rudman, M. & Valizadeh, A. 2020 Generating stable solitary waves with a piston-type wavemaker. Coast. Engng 157, 103633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, H., Hager, W. & Minor, H. 2004 Near field characteristics of landslide generated impulse waves. J. Waterway Port Coast. Ocean Engng 130 (6), 287302.Google Scholar
Fritz, H.M., Hager, W.H. & Minor, H.-E. 2003 a Landslide generated impulse waves. 1. Instantaneous flow fields. Exp. Fluids 35 (6), 505519.Google Scholar
Fritz, H.M., Hager, W.H. & Minor, H.-E. 2003 b Landslide generated impulse waves. 2. Hydrodynamic impact craters. Exp. Fluids 35 (6), 520532.Google Scholar
Goring, D.G. 1978 Tsunamis – the propagation of long waves onto a shelf. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Goring, D.G. & Raichlen, F. 1980 The generation of long waves in the laboratory. In Proceedings 17th Coastal Engineering Conference, ASCE, pp. 763783.Google Scholar
Guizien, K. & Barthélemy, E. 2002 Accuracy of solitary wave generation by a piston wave maker. J. Hydraul. Res. 40 (3), 321331.Google Scholar
Havelock, T.H. 1929 LIX. Forced surface-waves on water. Lond. Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 8 (51), 569576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, V. & Hager, W.H. 2011 Wave types of landslide generated impulse waves. Ocean Engng 38 (4), 630640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, R.A. 2005 Liquid Sloshing Dynamics: Theory and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joo, S.W., Schultz, W.W. & Messiter, A.F. 1990 An analysis of the initial-value wavemaker problem. J. Fluid Mech. 214, 161183.Google Scholar
Kennard, E.H. 1949 Generation of surface waves by a moving partition. Q. Appl. Maths 7 (3), 303312.Google Scholar
King, A.C. & Needham, D.J. 1994 The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction. Part 1. A uniformly accelerating plate. J. Fluid Mech. 268, 89101.Google Scholar
Korteweg, D.J. & de Vries, G. 1895 XLI. On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves. Lond. Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 39 (240), 422443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriaa, Q., Viroulet, S. & Lacaze, L. 2022 Modeling of impulse waves generated by a viscous collapse in water. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (5), 054801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W.M. 1984 Nonlinear motion of the free surface near a moving body. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Miller, R.L. & White, R.V. 1966 A single-impulse system for generating solitary, undulating surge, and gravity shock waves in the laboratory. In Fluid Dynamics and Sediment Transport Laboratory Report 5. Department of Geophysical Science, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Needham, D.J. 2012 The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free surface interaction. Part 4. The large-time structure. IMA J. Appl. Maths 77 (4), 451472.Google Scholar
Needham, D.J., Billingham, J. & King, A.C. 2007 The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction. Part 2. An impulsively moved plate. J. Fluid Mech. 578, 6784.Google Scholar
Needham, D.J., Chamberlain, P.G. & Billingham, J. 2008 The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free surface interaction. Part 3. An inclined accelerating plate. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 61 (4), 581614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noda, E. 1970 Water waves generated by landslides. J. Waterways Harbors Coast. Engng Div. 96 (4), 835855.Google Scholar
Perrard, S., Lozano-Durán, A., Rabaud, M., Benzaquen, M. & Moisy, F. 2019 Turbulent windprint on a liquid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 873, 10201054.Google Scholar
Poisson, S.D. 1818 Mémoire sur la théorie des ondes. Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France 1, 71186.Google Scholar
Rauter, M., Viroulet, S., Gylfadóttir, S.S., Fellin, W. & Løvholt, F. 2022 Granular porous landslide tsunami modelling – the 2014 Lake Askja flank collapse. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 678.Google ScholarPubMed
Riboux, G. & Gordillo, J.M. 2015 The diameters and velocities of the droplets ejected after splashing. J. Fluid Mech. 772, 630648.Google Scholar
Robbe-Saule, M., Morize, C., Bertho, Y., Sauret, A., Hildenbrand, A. & Gondret, P. 2021 a From laboratory experiments to geophysical tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides. Sci. Rep-UK 11 (1), 18437.Google ScholarPubMed
Robbe-Saule, M., Morize, C., Henaff, R., Bertho, Y., Sauret, A. & Gondret, P. 2021 b Experimental investigation of tsunami waves generated by granular collapse into water. J. Fluid Mech. 907, A11.Google Scholar
Roberts, A.J. 1987 Transient free-surface flows generated by a moving vertical plate. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 40 (1), 129158.Google Scholar
Sarlin, W., Morize, C., Sauret, A. & Gondret, P. 2021 a Collapse dynamics of dry granular columns: from free-fall to quasistatic flow. Phys. Rev. E 104 (6), 064904.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarlin, W., Morize, C., Sauret, A. & Gondret, P. 2021 b Nonlinear regimes of tsunami waves generated by a granular collapse. J. Fluid Mech. 919, R6.Google Scholar
Sarlin, W., Morize, C., Sauret, A. & Gondret, P. 2022 a From granular collapses to shallow water waves: a predictive model for tsunami generation. Phys. Rev. Fluids 7 (9), 094801.Google Scholar
Sarlin, W., Niu, Z., Morize, C., Sauret, A. & Gondret, P. 2022b Kaleidoscope of impulse waves. In Annual Meeting of the APS division of Fluid Dynamics.Google Scholar
Stoker, J.J. 1957 Water Waves: The Mathematical Theory with Applications. Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Synolakis, C.E. 1986 The run up of long waves. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Synolakis, C.E. 1989 Determining hydrodynamic force on accelerating plate in fluid with free surface. J. Engng Mech. 115 (11), 24802492.Google Scholar
Synolakis, C.E. 1990 Generation of long waves in laboratory. J. Waterway Port Coast. Ocean Engng ASCE 116 (2), 252266.Google Scholar
Uddin, J. & Needham, D.J. 2015 The effects of surface tension on the initial development of a free surface adjacent to an accelerated plate. J. Fluid Mech. 776, 3773.Google Scholar
Viroulet, S., Cébron, D., Kimmoun, O. & Kharif, C. 2013 Shallow water waves generated by subaerial solid landslides. Geophys. J. Intl 193 (2), 747762.Google Scholar
Whitham, G.B. 1999 Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley.Google Scholar
Wolper, J., Gao, M., Lüthi, M.P., Heller, V., Vieli, A., Jiang, C. & Gaume, J. 2021 A glacier–ocean interaction model for tsunami genesis due to iceberg calving. Commun. Earth Environ. 2 (1), 130.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 1

210715 Dispersive wave generated by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston in a water channel. The translating wall experiences a constant acceleration phase, followed by a constant deceleration of equal duration. The total stroke of the piston is 7 cm, its maximal velocity 0.42 m/s and the initial water depth is 20 cm.
Download Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 1(File)
File 6.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 2

210706 Solitary wave generated by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston in a water channel. The translating wall experiences a constant acceleration phase, followed by a constant deceleration of equal duration. The total stroke of the piston is 15 cm, its maximal velocity is 0.47 m/s and the initial water depth is 10 cm.
Download Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 2(File)
File 14.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 3

210610 Spilling breaking bore generated by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston in a water channel. The translating wall experiences a constant acceleration phase, followed by a constant deceleration of equal duration. The total stroke of the piston is 30 cm, its maximal velocity is 0.6 m/s and the initial water depth is 3 cm.
Download Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 3(File)
File 14.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 4

210702 30.0 Plunging breaking bore generated by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston in a water channel. The translating wall experiences a constant acceleration phase, followed by a constant deceleration of equal duration. The total stroke of the piston is 30 cm, its maximal velocity is 1.09 m/s and the initial water depth is 3 cm.
Download Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 4(File)
File 11.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 5

210702 14.5 Water jet generated by the impulsive motion of a rigid piston in a water channel. The translating wall experiences a constant acceleration phase, followed by a constant deceleration of equal duration. The total stroke of the piston is 14.5 cm, its maximal velocity is 1.19 m/s and the initial water depth is 3 cm.
Download Sarlin et al. supplementary material movie 5(File)
File 9.4 MB