Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:03:25.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of entrainment in turbulent line plumes adjacent to and distant from a vertical wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

D. A. Parker Open the ORCID record for D. A. Parker [Opens in a new window] ,
H. C. Burridge Open the ORCID record for H. C. Burridge [Opens in a new window] ,
J. L. Partridge  and
P. F. Linden
D. A. Parker*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
H. C. Burridge
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Skempton Building, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
J. L. Partridge
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
P. F. Linden
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present simultaneous two-dimensional measurements of the velocity and buoyancy fields on a central vertical plane in two-dimensional line plumes: a free plume distant from vertical boundaries and a wall plume, adjacent to a vertical wall. Data are presented in both an Eulerian and a plume coordinate system that follow the instantaneous turbulent/non-turbulent interface (TNTI) of the plume. We present measurements in both coordinate systems and compare the entrainment in the two flows. We find that the value of the entrainment coefficient in the wall plume is greater than half that of the free plume. The reduction in entrainment is investigated by considering a decomposition of the entrainment coefficient based on the mean kinetic energy where the relative contributions of turbulent production, buoyancy and viscous terms are calculated. The reduced entrainment is also investigated by considering the statistics of the TNTI and the conditional vertical transport of the ambient and engulfed fluid. We show that the wall shear stress is non-negligible and that the free plume exhibits significant meandering. The effect of the meandering on the entrainment process is quantified in terms of the stretching of the TNTI where it is shown that the length of the TNTI is greater in the free plume and, further, the relative vertical transport of the engulfed ambient fluid is observed to be 15 % greater in the free plume. Finally, the turbulent velocity and buoyancy fluctuations, Reynolds stresses and the turbulent buoyancy fluxes are presented in both coordinate systems.

JFM classification

Convection: Plumes/thermals Wakes/Jets: Jets Turbulent Flows: Turbulent convection
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 882 , 10 January 2020 , A4
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bisset, D. K., Hunt, J. C. R. & Rogers, M. M. 2002 The turbulent/non-turbulent interface bounding a far wake. J. Fluid Mech. 451, 383–410.Google Scholar
Burridge, H. C., Parker, D. A., Kruger, E. S., Partridge, J. L. & Linden, P. F. 2017 Conditional sampling of a high Péclet number turbulent plume and the implications for entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 823, 26–56.Google Scholar
Chauhan, K., Philip, J., de Silva, C. M., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2014 The turbulent/non-turbulent interface and entrainment in a boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 742, 119–151.Google Scholar
Crimaldi, J. P. 2008 Planar laser induced fluorescence in aqueous flows. Exp. Fluids 44 (6), 851–863.Google Scholar
Ellison, T. H. & Turner, J. S. 1959 Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 423–448.Google Scholar
Ferrier, A. J., Funk, D. R. & Roberts, P. J. W. 1993 Application of optical techniques to the study of plumes in stratified fluids. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 20 (1), 155–183; American Geophysical Union Ocean Sciences Meeting.Google Scholar
Fischer, H. B., List, J. E., Imberger, J., Koh, C. R. & Brooks, N. H. 1979 Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grella, J. J. & Faeth, G. M. 1975 Measurements in a two-dimensional thermal plume along a vertical adiabatic wall. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 701–710.Google Scholar
Holzner, M., van Reeuwijk, M. & Jonker, H. 2016 Turbulent entrainment in a gravity current. In Sustainable Hydraulics in the Era of Global Change: Proceedings of the 4th European Congress of the International Association of Hydroenvironment Engineering and Research, IAHR 2016, pp. 1025–1031. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Kaminski, E., Tait, S. & Carazzo, G. 2005 Turbulent entrainment in jets with arbitrary buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 526, 361–376.Google Scholar
Kotsovinos, N. 1975 Study of the Entrainment and Turbulence in a Plane Buoyancy Jet. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Krug, D., Holzner, M., Lüthi, B., Wolf, M., Kinzelbach, W. & Tsinober, A. 2013 Experimental study of entrainment and interface dynamics in a gravity current. Exp. Fluids 54 (5), 1530.Google Scholar
Lai, M. C. & Faeth, G. M. 1987 Turbulent structure of vertical adiabatic wall plumes. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 109 (3), 663–670.Google Scholar
Lee, S. L. & Emmons, H. W. 1961 A study of natural convection above a line fire. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 353–368.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1990 Interface dimension in intermittent turbulence. Phys. Rev. A 41, 2246–2248.Google Scholar
Mistry, D., Dawson, J. R. & Kerstein, A. R. 2018 The multi-scale geometry of the near field in an axisymmetric jet. J. Fluid Mech. 838, 501–515.Google Scholar
Mistry, D., Philip, J., Dawson, J. R. & Marusic, I. 2016 Entrainment at multi-scales across the turbulent/non-turbulent interface in an axisymmetric jet. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 690–725.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. I. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 234, 1–24.Google Scholar
Odier, P., Chen, J. & Ecke, R. E. 2012 Understanding and modeling turbulent fluxes and entrainment in a gravity current. Physica D 241 (3), 260–268; special issue on small scale turbulence.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, J. & Dalziel, S. B. 2017 Three-dimensional visualization of the interaction of a vortex ring with a stratified interface. J. Fluid Mech. 820, 549–579.Google Scholar
Ottino, J. M. 1989 The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paillat, S. & Kaminski, E. 2014a Entrainment in plane turbulent pure plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 755, R2.Google Scholar
Paillat, S. & Kaminski, E. 2014b Second-order model of entrainment in planar turbulent jets at low Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 26 (4), 045110.Google Scholar
Philip, J., Meneveau, C., de Silva, C. M. & Marusic, I. 2014 Multiscale analysis of fluxes at the turbulent/non-turbulent interface in high Reynolds number boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 26 (1), 015105.Google Scholar
Prasad, R. R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1989 Scalar interfaces in digital images of turbulent flows. Exp. Fluids 7 (4), 259–264.Google Scholar
Priestley, C. H. B. & Ball, F. K. 1955 Continuous convection from an isolated source of heat. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 81 (348), 144–157.Google Scholar
Ramaprian, B. R. & Chandrasekhara, M. S. 1989 Measurements in vertical plane turbulent plumes. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 111, 69–77.Google Scholar
van Reeuwijk, M. & Craske, J. 2015 Energy-consistent entrainment relations for jets and plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 782, 333–355.Google Scholar
van Reeuwijk, M., Salizzoni, P., Hunt, G. R. & Craske, J. 2016 Turbulent transport and entrainment in jets and plumes: a DNS study. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 074301.Google Scholar
Rouse, H., YIH, C. S. & Humphreys, H. W. 1952 Gravitational convection from a boundary source. Tellus 4 (3), 201–210.Google Scholar
Sangras, R., Dai, Z. & Faeth, G. M. 1998 Mixing structure of a plane self-preserving buoyant turbulent plumes. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 120, 1033–1041.Google Scholar
Sangras, R., Dai, Z. & Faeth, G. M. 1999 Mixture fraction statistics of plane self-preserving buoyant turbulent adiabatic wall plumes. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 121 (4), 837–843.Google Scholar
Sangras, R., Dai, Z. & Faeth, G. M. 2000 Velocity statistics of plane self-preserving buoyant turbulent adiabatic wall plumes. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 122 (4), 693–700.Google Scholar
de Silva, C. M., Philip, J., Chauhan, K., Meneveau, C. & Marusic, I. 2013 Multiscale geometry and scaling of the turbulent-nonturbulent interface in high Reynolds number boundary layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 044501.Google Scholar
Terashima, O., Sakai, Y., Nagata, K., Ito, Y., Onishi, K. & Shouji, Y. 2016 Simultaneous measurement of velocity and pressure near the turbulent/non-turbulent interface of a planar turbulent jet. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 75, 137–146.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J., Fukushima, C., Pedersen, J. M. & Hunt, J. C. R. 2005 Mechanics of the turbulent-nonturbulent interface of a jet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 174501.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J., Fukushima, C., Pedersen, J. M. & Hunt, J. C. R. 2009 Momentum and scalar transport at the turbulent/non-turbulent interface of a jet. J. Fluid Mech. 631, 199–230.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J., Hofmann, T., Fukushima, C. & Hunt, J. 2002 The turbulent/non-turbulent interface at the outer boundary of a self-similar turbulent jet. Exp. Fluids 33 (6), 873–878.Google Scholar
Willert, C. 1997 Stereoscopic digital particle image velocimetry for application in wind tunnel flows. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8 (12), 1465–1479.Google Scholar
Yuana, L. M. & Cox, G. 1996 An experimental study of some line fires. Fire Safety J. 27 (2), 123–139.Google Scholar