Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T09:58:46.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Did Tough Antitrust Enforcement Cause the Diversification of American Corporations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John G. Matsusaka
John G. Matsusaka
Affiliation:
Department of Finance and Business Economics, School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1421.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the hypothesis that tough antitrust enforcement in the 1960s led firms to engage in diversification programs by preventing them from growing within their own industries. If true, diversification should have occurred more often when large firms merged than when small firms merged because small mergers were less likely to have received antitrust attention. Such a pattern is not observed in a sample of 549 acquisitions from 1968—diversification was equally common in large and small mergers. Survey evidence shows that diversification movements occurred in other industrialized nations where there was a loose antitrust environment. Both pieces of evidence suggest that antitrust played a minor role in the diversification movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 283 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, G. P. “Beatrice: A Study in the Creation and Destruction of Value.” Journal of Finance, 47 (07 1992), 1081–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J., and Gorecki, P.. “Mergers and the Competitive Process.” Queen's Univ. and Economic Council of Canada (1990).Google Scholar
Blair, M. M.; Lane, S. J.; and Schary, M. A.. “Patterns of Corporate Restructuring.” Brookings Institution Discussion Paper (01 1991).Google Scholar
Blair, R. D., and Kaserman, D. L.. Antitrust Economics. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. (1985).Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. Jr. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. Jr. “The Functions of the HQ Unit in the Multibusiness Firm.” Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Winter 1991), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comment, R., and Jarrell, G. A.. “Corporate Focus and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 37 (01 1995), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, A. W., and Meeks, G.. “Diversification by Merger.” Economica, 49 (11 1982), 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Leboyer, M. “The Large Corporation in Modern France.” In Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise. Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, and Daems, Herman, eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press (1980).Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G. “Target Profits and Managerial Discipline during the Conglomerate Merger Wave.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 41 (06 1993a), 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G. “Takeover Motives during the Conglomerate Merger Wave. RAND Journal of Economics, 24 (Autumn 1993b), 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuckin, R. H.; Nguyen, S. V.; and Andrews, S. H.. “The Relationship among Acquiring and Acquired Firms' Product Lines. “Journal of Law and Economics, 34 (10 1991), 477–502.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Report of the Committee of Experts on Restrictive Business Practices). Mergers and Competition Policy. Paris, France: OECD (1974).Google Scholar
Posner, R. A.Antitrust: Cases, Economic Notes, and Other Materials. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co. (1974).Google Scholar
Ravenscraft, D. J., and Scherer, F. M.. Mergers, Sell-offs, and Economic Efficiency. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution (1987).Google Scholar
Ritz, P. M. “The Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy, 1972.” Survey of Current Business, 59 (02 1979), 34–71.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, second ed.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally College Publishing Co. (1980).Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “The Takeover Wave of the 1980s.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 3 (Fall 1991), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, R.The Rise and Fall of the Conglomerate Kings. New York, NY: Stein and Day (1984).Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. “The Economic Effects of the Antitrust Laws.” Journal of Law and Economics, 9 (10 1966), 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar