Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T17:40:35.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Michael Firth ,
Chen Lin  and
Hong Zou
Michael Firth
Affiliation:
Department of Finance and Insurance, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, China. [email protected]
Chen Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. [email protected]
Hong Zou
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave., Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent split share structure reform in China involves the nontradable shareholders proposing a compensation package to the tradable shareholders in exchange for the listing rights of their shares. We find that state ownership (the major owners of nontradable shares) has a positive effect on the final compensation ratio. In contrast, mutual fund ownership (the major institutional owner of tradable shares) has a negative effect on the compensation ratio and especially in state-owned firms. The evidence is consistent with our predictions that state shareholders have incentives to complete the reform quickly and exert political pressure on mutual funds to accept the terms without a fight.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , June 2010 , pp. 685 - 706
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “The Liquidity Route to a Lower Cost of Capital.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12 (2000), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J. A.; Lease, R. C.; and Smith, C. W. Jr. “Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. M.; Firth, M.; Gao, D. N.; and Rui, O. M.. “Is China’s Securities Regulatory Agency a Toothless Tiger? Evidence from Enforcement Actions.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24 (2005), 451–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. M.; Firth, M.; Gao, D. N.; and Rui, O. M.. “Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Fraud: Evidence from China.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (2006), 424–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. M.; Firth, M.; and Rui, O. M.. “Have China’s Enterprise Reforms Led to Improved Efficiency and Profitability? ” Emerging Markets Review, 7 (2006), 82–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. M.; Firth, M.; Xin, Y.; and Xu, L.. “Control Transfers, Privatization, and Corporate Performance: Efficiency Gains in China’s Listed Companies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. J. “70 Billion Yuan State-Owned Assets Await Listing in Shanghai.” Shanghai Securities Daily (in Chinese), April 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.. “Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1997), 1167–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Experimental Rules on Open-End Mutual Funds (2000).Google Scholar
Chow, G. C. China’s Economic Transformation. 2nd ed., New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell (2007).Google Scholar
Cornett, M. M.; Marcus, A. J.; Saunders, A.; and Tehranian, H.. “The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31 (2007), 1771–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. F., and Kim, E. H.. “Business Ties and Proxy Voting by Mutual Funds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 85 (2007), 552–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinerman, J. V. “New Hope for Corporate Governance in China?” China Quarterly, 191 (2007), 590–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, S. P., and Yan, X.. “Do Independent Directors and Chairmen Matter? The Role of Boards of Directors in Mutual Fund Governance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 13 (2007), 392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, M.; Lin, C.; and Zou, H.. “Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China.” Working Paper, Lingnan University of Hong Kong (2008).Google Scholar
Gaspar, J.-M.; Massa, M.; and Matos, P.. “Shareholder Investment Horizons and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 76 (2005), 135–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, N. “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, J. C., and Starks, L. T.. “Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2351–2374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong Kong Stock Exchange. “Institutional Investors in Mainland China.” Research and Planning Department Report (January 2004).Google Scholar
Huang, J. Z. “Funds’ Rent Seeking in Share Structure Reform.” Economy Monthly (in Chinese), 6 (2006), 60–61.Google Scholar
Kahl, M.; Liu, J.; and Longstaff, F. A.. “Paper Millionaires: How Valuable Is Stock to a Stockholder Who Is Restricted from Selling It? ” Journal of Financial Economics, 67 (2003), 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khorana, A.; Tufano, P.; and Wedge, L.. “Board Structure, Mergers, and Shareholder Wealth: A Study of the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Financial Economics, 85 (2007), 571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.; Ho, I. S. M.; and St. Giles, M.. “Developing Institutional Investors in People’s Republic of China.” World Bank Country Study Paper (2003).Google Scholar
Longstaff, F. A. “How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values?” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1767–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F. A. “Optimal Portfolio Choice and the Valuation of Illiquid Securities.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y. “The Seven Vacuums in the Mutual Fund System in China.” China Securities Daily (in Chinese) (February 18, 2006).Google Scholar
Mahoney, P. G. “Manager-Investor Conflicts in Mutual Funds.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (2004), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehran, H., and Stulz, R. M.. “The Economics of Conflicts of Interest in Financial Institutions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 85 (2007), 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrino, R.; Sias, R. W.; and Starks, L. T.. “Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes around Forced CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (2003), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenev, S.; Zhang, C.; and Brefort, L.. Corporate Governance and Enterprise Reform in China: Building the Institutions of Modern Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (2002).Google Scholar
Wahal, S. “Pension Fund Activism and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, R. L.; Xiao, J. Z.; and Zou, H.. “Mutual Funds’ Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from China.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (2008), 1552–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar