Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T21:49:41.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence on Corporate Hedging Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Shehzad L. Mian
Affiliation:
Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322

Abstract

This paper provides empirical evidence on the determinants of corporate hedging decisions. The paper examines the evidence in light of currently mandated financial reporting requirements and, in particular, the constraints placed on anticipatory hedging. Data on hedging are obtained from 1992 annual reports for a sample of 3,022 firms. Out of the 771 firms classified as hedgers, 543 firms disclose information in their annual reports on their hedging activities; the remaining 228 firms report use of derivatives but no information on hedging activities. Based on the evidence, I draw the following conclusions with respect to the models of hedging: evidence is inconsistent with financial distress cost models; evidence is mixed with respect to contracting cost, capital market imperfections, and tax-based models; and evidence uniformly supports the hypothesis that hedging activities exhibit economies of scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AICPA. “Current Accounting and Auditing Literature: A Report Prepared by the Financial Instruments Task Force of the Accounting Standards Executive Committee.” American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (1994).Google Scholar
Barclay, M., and Smith, C. W. Jr., “The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995a), 609631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M., and Smith, C. W. Jr., “The Priority Structure of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995b), 899917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benston, G. B., and Mian, S. L.. “Financial Reporting of Derivatives: An Analysis of the Issues, Evaluation of Proposals, and a Suggested Solution.” Journal of Financial Engineering, 4 (1995), 217246.Google Scholar
Block, S. B., and Gallagher, T. J.. “The Use of Interest Rate Futures and Options by Corporate Financial Managers.” Financial Management, 15 (1986), 7378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, J. R.; Smith, R. L.; and Stolz, R. W.. “The Use of Interest Rate Futures by Financial Institutions.” Journal of Bank Research, 15 (1984), 1520.Google Scholar
Dolde, W.The Trajectory of Corporate Financial Risk Management.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 6 (1993), 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froot, K. A.; Scharfstein, D. S.; and Stein, J.. “Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 16291648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, J. J., and Gaver, K. M.. “Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16 (1993), 125160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, L., and Kothari, S. P.. “Life Insurance or Lottery: Are Corporations Managing or Taking Risks with Derivatives?” Working Paper, Univ. of Rochester (1995).Google Scholar
Houston, C. O., and Mueller, G. G.. “Foreign Exchange Rate Hedging and SFAS No. 52—Relatives or Strangers?Accounting Horizons, 2 (1988), 5057.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewent, J. C., and Kearney, A. J.. “Identifying, Measuring, and Hedging Currency Risk at Merck.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2 (1990), 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, D., and Smith, C. W. Jr., “On the Corporate Demand for Insurance.” Journal of Business, 55 (1982), 281296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, D., and Smith, C. W. Jr., “Corporate Insurance and the Underinvestment Problem.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 54 (1987), 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers, D., and Smith, C. W. Jr., “On the Corporate Demand for Insurance: Evidence from Reinsurance Market.” Journal of Business, 63 (1990), 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S.Determinants of Corporate Hedging.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 147175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S., and Majluf, N.. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1984), 187221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nance, D. R.; Smith, C. W. Jr.,; and Smithson, C. W.. “On the Determinants of Corporate Hedging.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 267284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W. Jr., and Stulz, R.. “The Determinants of Firms' Hedging Policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (1985), 391405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W. Jr., and Warner, J.. “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 117161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W. Jr., and Watts, R. L.. “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1992), 263292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R.Optimal Hedging Policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19 (1984), 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titman, S., and Wessels, R.. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” Journal of Finance, 43 (1988), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton/Chase. Survey of Derivatives Usage among U.S. Non-Financial Firms. Weiss Center for International Finance, Conducted for the Chase Manhattan Bank, NA, Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School (02 1995).Google Scholar