Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:06:09.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Schemes of Practical Utility”: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Among “Great Inventors” in the United States, 1790–1865

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

B. Zorina Khan  and
Kenneth L. Sokoloff
B. Zorina Khan
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.
Kenneth L. Sokoloff
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles, CA 90024
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The growth in inventive activity during early American industrialization is explored by examining the careers of 160 inventors credited with important technological discoveries. Analysis of biographical information and complete patent histories through 1865 indicates that these “great inventors” were entrepreneurial and responded systematically to market demand. Their inventions were procyclical and originated disproportionately from localities linked with extensive markets. Although unexceptional in terms of schooling or technical skills, they vigorously pursued the returns to their inventions, redirected their inventive activity to meet emerging needs, and were distinguished by high geographical mobility toward districts conducive to invention and its commercialization.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fifty-Second Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 289 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, J. Leander, A History of American Manufactures, from 1608–1860, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1868).Google Scholar
Gilfillan, S. C., Sociology of Invention (Cambridge, MA, 1935).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, William T., Cyrus Hall McCormick, 2 vols. (New York and London, c. 1930).Google Scholar
Kaempffert, Waldemar, “Systematic Invention,” The Forum, 70 (1923), pp. 2010–18, 2116–22.Google Scholar
Malone, Dumas, ed., Dictionary of American Biography (New York, 1937), vols. 1–10.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Growth (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob, “The Economic Sources of Inventive Activity,” this Journal, 22 (03 1962), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob, Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Productivity Growth in Manufacturing During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the American Northeast, 1820 to 1860,” in Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth (Chicago, 1986), pp. 679–736.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846,” this Journal, 48 (12 1988), pp. 813–50.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., “Invention, Innovation, and Manufacturing Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Northeast,” in Gallman, Robert E. and Wallis, John Joseph, eds., American Economic Growth and Standards of Living Before the Civil War (Chicago, 1992), pp. 345–84.Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth L., and Khan, B. Zorina, “The Democratization of Invention During Early Industrialization: Evidence from the United States, 1790–1846,” this Journal, 50 (06 1990), pp. 363–78.Google Scholar
The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography (New York, 1926), various volumes.Google Scholar
United States Census Office, Statistics of the United States in 1860 (8th census, vol. 1), (Washington, DC, 1866).Google Scholar
United States Patent Office, Annual Report of the Commissioner of Patents (Washington, DC, various years).Google Scholar
Who Was Who in America: Historical Volume, 1607–1896 (Chicago, 1963).Google Scholar