Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Eisenhauer, Joseph G.
1995.
The Entrepreneurial Decision: Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
67.
Lamoreaux, Naomi R.
and
Sokoloff, Kenneth L.
1996.
Long-term change in the organization of inventive activity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 93,
Issue. 23,
p.
12686.
Meyer, David R.
1998.
Formation of Advanced Technology Districts: New England Textile Machinery and Firearms, 1790–1820*.
Economic Geography,
Vol. 74,
Issue. s1,
p.
31.
Davids, Karel
2000.
Patents and patentees in the Dutch republic between c.1580 and 1720.
History and Technology,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
263.
Khan, B. Zorina
2000.
“Not for Ornament”: Patenting Activity by Nineteenth-Century Women Inventors.
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
159.
Khan, B. Zorina
and
Sokoloff, Kenneth L
2001.
History Lessons: The Early Development of Intellectual Property Institutions in the United States.
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
233.
Lamoreaux, Naomi R
and
Sokoloff, Kenneth L
2001.
Market Trade in Patents and the Rise of a Class of Specialized Inventors in the 19th Century United States.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 2,
p.
39.
Co, Catherine
2002.
Evolution of the Geography of Innovation: Evidence from Patent Data.
Growth and Change,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 4,
p.
393.
Sáiz, Patricio
2002.
The Spanish Patent System. Origins, Characteristics and Evolution.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Schwerin, Joachim
and
Werker, Claudia
2003.
Learning innovation policy based on historical experience.
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
385.
Acemoglu, Daron
2003.
The Form of Property Rights: Oligarchic vs. Democratic Societies.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Khan, B. Zorina
and
Sokoloff, Kenneth L
2004.
Institutions and Democratic Invention in 19th-Century America: Evidence from “Great Inventors,” 1790–1930.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 2,
p.
395.
Nard, Craig Allen
and
Morriss, Andrew P.
2004.
Constitutionalizing Patents: From Venice to Philadelphia.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Agarwal, Rajshree
and
Bayus, Barry L.
2004.
Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle.
Vol. 21,
Issue. ,
p.
107.
Nuvolari, A.
2004.
Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine.
Cambridge Journal of Economics,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
347.
Moser, Petra
2005.
How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs.
American Economic Review,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 4,
p.
1214.
Weick, Cynthia Wagner
and
Eakin, Cynthia F.
2005.
Independent Inventors and Innovation.
The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.
Mokyr, Joel
2005.
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
1113.
Reiner, Bruce I.
2008.
Intellectual Property in Medical Imaging and Informatics: The Independent Inventor’s Perspective.
Journal of Digital Imaging,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Carolan, Michael S.
2008.
Constructing the “pure” inventor: individual, collective, and corporate authorship within patent law.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
301.