Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T19:26:07.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keynes Versus Churchill: Revaluation and British Unemployment in the 1920s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Susan Wolcott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The textbook explanation for Britain's high unemployment in the 1920s is that the return to gold at $4.86 left the currency overvalued. Recent estimates suggest that an 11 percent devaluation would have eliminated roughly half the unemployment in 1925. This article questions the validity of that conclusion. It measures the power of exchange rate devaluations to decrease unemployment in the context of sectorally distinct labor markets. The results suggest that though a devaluation would have been helpful, eliminating half of 1925's unemployment would have required one much greater than 11 percent and would have caused significant price pressures.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 601 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldcroft, Derek H., The Inter-War Economy: Britain 1919–39 (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Allen, G. C., British Industries and Their Organization (4th edn., London, 1970).Google Scholar
Amemiya, Takeshi, “The Nonlinear Two-Stage Least-Squares Estimator,” Journal of Econometrics, 2 (1974), pp. 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, W., An Economic History of England 1870–1939 (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
Beck, G. M., A Survey of British Employment and Unemployment, 1927–1945 (Oxford, 1952).Google Scholar
Booth, Alan E., and Glynn, Sean, “Unemployment in the Interwar Period: A Multiple Problem,” Journal of Contemporary History, 10 (10 1975), pp. 611–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., “Unemployment in Interwar Britain: A Disequilibrium View” (Ph.D. diss., Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., The British Economy Between the Wars: A Macroeconomic Survey (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
“Central Banking in the 1920's,” The Economist (12 22–01 1, 1991), pp. 114–15.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis, and Mitchell, Brian, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar
De Long, J. Bradford, “Was Britain's Return to Gold Worth It?” (Photocopy, Harvard University and MIT, 11 1986).Google Scholar
Dimsdale, N. H., “British Monetary Policy and the Exchange Rate 1920–1938,” Oxford Economic Papers (Supplement), 33 (07 1981), pp. 306–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Sachs, Jeffrey, “Exchange Rates and Economic Recovery in the 1930s,” this Journal, 45 (12 1985), pp. 925–46.Google Scholar
Evans, George, “Bottlenecks and the Phillips Curve: A Disaggregated Keynesian Model of Inflation, Output and Unemployment,” Economic Journal, 95 (06 1985), pp. 345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H., Domestic Capital Formation in the United Kingdom 1920–1938 (Cambridge, 1965).Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H., National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1865 (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar
Hancock, K. J., “The Reduction of Unemployment as a Problem of Public Policy, 1920–29,” Economic History Review, 15 (12 1962), pp. 328–43.Google Scholar
Hatton, Timothy J., “Structural Aspects of Unemployment in Britain Between the World Wars,” in Uselding, Paul, ed., Research in Economic History (Greenwich, CT, 1986), vol. 10, pp. 55–92.Google Scholar
Heim, Carol, “Industrial Organization and Regional Development in Interwar Britain,” this Journal, 43 (12 1983), pp. 931–52.Google Scholar
Jones, M. E. F., “The Regional Impact of an Overvalued Pound in the 1920s,” Economic History Review, 38 (08 1985), pp. 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, George C., Hill, R. Carter, Griffiths, William et al. , The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (2nd edn., New York, 1985).Google Scholar
Keynes, John M., “The Committee on the Currency,” The Economic Journal (06 1925), pp. 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John M., Essays in Persuasion (New York, 1932).Google Scholar
Lee, Clive Howard, British Regional Employment Statistics, 1841–1971 (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur, “World Production, Prices and Trade, 1870–1960,” The Manchester School, 20 (05 1952), pp. 105–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomax, K. C, “Production and Productivity Movements in the United Kingdom since 1900,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (1959), pp. 185–220.Google Scholar
Makower, H., Marschak, J., and Robinson, H. W., “Studies in Mobility of Labour: A Tentative Statistical Measure,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1 (10 1938), pp. 83–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makower, H., Marschak, J., and Robinson, H. W., “Studies in Mobility of Labour: Analysis for Great Britain, Part I,” Oxford Economic Papers, 2 (05 1939), pp. 70–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makower, H., Marschak, J., and Robinson, H. W., “Studies in Mobility of Labour: Analysis for Great Britain, Part II,” Oxford Economic Papers, 4 (09 1940), pp. 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, K. G. P., “A Rational Expectations Model of the Inter-War Period” (Ph.D. diss., University of Liverpool, 1984).Google Scholar
Matthews, K. G. P., “Was Sterling Overvalued in 1925?” Economic History Review, 39 (11 1986), pp. 572–87.Google Scholar
Mills, Terence C., “Are Fluctuations in U.K. Output Transitory or Permanent?” The Manchester School, 59 (03 1991), pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Terence C., and Wood, G. E., “Money Substitutes and Monetary Policy in the UK 1922–1974,” European Economic Review, 10 (10 1977), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggridge, Donald E., British Monetary Policy: The Norman Conquest of $4.86 (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney, The Development of the British Economy (2nd edn., New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Redmond, John, “The Sterling Overvaluation in 1925: A Multilateral Approach,” Economic History Review, 37 (11 1984), pp. 520–32.Google Scholar
Thomas, T., “Aggregate Demand in the United Kingdom 1918–1945,” in Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, eds., The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Volume 2 (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 332–46.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Jim, Public Policy and the Economy since 1900 (Oxford, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Kingdom, Records Office, Cabinet 58/11, “The State of Trade,” Answers by Mr. Keynes (21 07 1930).Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Parliamentary Debates (Commons), 5th ser., vol. 187 (1924–1925).Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Parliament, Report of the Committee on the Currency and Bank of England Note Issue [Chamberlin-Bradbury Committee Report], Cmd. 2393, London, 1925.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Parliament, Report of the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Industrial Population [Barlow Report], Jones, J. H., “A Memorandum on the Location of Industry,” Cmd. 6153, London, 1939.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, Parliament, “Trade and Navigation Accounts,” London, 1900–1938.Google Scholar
United States, U.S. Abstract of Historical Statistics, ser. M208 (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
Winch, Donald, Economics and Policy: A Historical Study (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Wolcott, Susan, “Keynes vs. Churchill: British Unemployment in the Twenties” (Ph.D. diss., Stanford, 1988).Google Scholar
Wolcott, Susan, “British Myopia and the Collapse of Indian Textile Demand,” this Journal, 51 (06 1991), pp. 367–84.Google Scholar