Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:21:21.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Dye, Huck, and Sicsic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Gregory Clark
Gregory Clark
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Summaries of Doctoral Dissertations
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 408 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As a footnote let me comment that this thesis sported a stylistic innovation that I detested. It dispensed with footnotes, instead providing all the subsidiary material in the text. In contrast, Andrew Rutten made masterful and praiseworthy use in his thesis of 406 footnotes in only 131 pages.