Introduction
Fetal growth restriction (FGR; estimated fetal weight <10th percentile) occurs in up to 10% of pregnancies in the developed world with suboptimal fetal nutrition and uteroplacental perfusion accounting for 25–30% of cases. Reference Resnik1,Reference Bamfo and Odibo2 As one of the leading causes of stillbirth, miscarriage and infant morbidity, FGR is also associated with an increased risk of developing non-communicable diseases (NCDs; including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, central obesity, type 2 diabetes) in later life. Reference Godfrey and Barker3-Reference Hanson and Gluckman5 Currently, FGR is diagnosed after it is established and there is no effective in utero treatment for FGR, thus no clinical intervention that could potentially impact or prevent the development of NCDs in adulthood.
The “developmental origins of health and disease” (DoHAD) hypothesis states that early environmental stressors during critical fetal developmental windows result in permanent, adaptive structural, and physiologic changes that predispose the offspring to metabolic, endocrine, and cardiovascular disease in postnatal life. Reference Barker and Osmond6 Animal models have shown that FGR is associated with increased hepatic gluconeogenic gene expression and glucose production in late pregnancy, in response to reduced placental glucose supply. Reference Gentili, Morrison and McMillen7-Reference Thorn, Regnault and Brown9 Whilst these adaptive responses may be temporarily beneficial in utero, persistent increased liver glucose production beyond birth, when dietary glucose is no longer limited, may have adverse consequences to health. Excess glucose production leads to hyperglycemia and the development of obesity and/or metabolic disease.
Liver gluconeogenesis is the de novo synthesis of glucose from noncarbohydrate precursors and is principally controlled by activities of enzymes such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK/PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC). Reference Yoon, Puigserver and Chen10 There are two isozymes of PCK: the cytosolic isozyme PCK1 and the mitochondrial isozyme PCK2, both of which are involved in hepatic gluconeogenesis. Reference Beale, Harvey and Forest11 During fetal development, gluconeogenesis occurs in late gestation, although activity of gluconeogenic enzymes has been shown at mid-pregnancy. Reference Jones and Ashton12 Studies, predominantly performed in sheep models of FGR, and focused on changes in late gestation, have shown fetal hepatic adaptations to support glucose production. Reference Gentili, Morrison and McMillen7,Reference Brown, Rozance, Bruce, Friedman, Hay and Wesolowski13-Reference Thorn, Brown, Rozance, Hay and Friedman15 FGR is associated with increased expression of Pck1, Pck2, and G6pc in the fetal liver, and transcriptomic analysis indicates increased amino acid catabolism and cell stress along with decreased mitochondrial activity. Reference Jones, Brown and Rozance14 Moreover, increased expression of Pck has been shown to persist into adulthood, at the equivalent human age of 50–60 years. Reference George, Zhang and Tuersunjiang16 However, the effects FGR on liver expression of gluconeogenic enzymes around the initiation of FGR are lacking.
Given that fetal hepatic adaptations to glucose production are linked to insufficient placental glucose supply, directly targeting the dysfunctional placenta to increase glucose and other nutrient transport capacities may restore supply and mitigate DoHAD-associated developmental programming. We have developed the use of a polymer-based nanoparticle that facilitates nonviral, transient (does not integrate into the genome), gene delivery specifically to the placenta. Reference Abd Ellah, Taylor and Troja17,Reference Wilson, Owens and Sumser18 Using a biosynthetic HPMA-DMEAMA (N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide-2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) copolymer, complexed with a plasmid containing the human insulin-like growth factor 1 (hIGF1) gene under the control of trophoblast specific promotors (PLAC1, CYP19A1), we have successful shown efficient nanoparticle uptake into human syncytiotrophoblast ex vivo Reference Wilson, Owens and Sumser18 as well as in vivo using animal models. Reference Abd Ellah, Taylor and Troja17,Reference Wilson, Troja, Sumser, Maupin, Lampe and Jones19-Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 Short-term effects of hIGF1 gene therapy results in increased placental expression of glucose and amino acid transporters, maintenance of normal fetal growth under FGR conditions, and increased fetal glucose concentrations. Reference Abd Ellah, Taylor and Troja17,Reference Wilson, Troja, Sumser, Maupin, Lampe and Jones19-Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 Importantly, our nanoparticle gene therapy is proven to be safe to both mother and fetus and is capable of positively influencing placental function in diverse models of FGR as IGF1 is central to most mechanisms responsible for FGR associated with placental dysfunction, and a major regulator of normal placental and fetal growth and development. Reference Fowden22
We have previously shown in the guinea pig MNR model of FGR, efficient uptake of our hIGF1 nanoparticle gene therapy into the guinea pig placenta, and no transfer of nanoparticle or hIGF1 plasmid into fetal circulation. Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 In the present study, we aimed to characterize the effects of FGR on hepatic insulin-sensing and gluconeogenic enzyme gene expression at the initial stages of FGR establishment in the fetal guinea pig, and determine whether treatment of the placenta with our hIGF1 nanoparticle gene therapy could resolve differences in hepatic insulin-sensing and gluconeogenic enzyme gene expression in the FGR fetus.
Materials and methods
Polymer synthesis and nanoparticle formation
Detailed methods on the synthesis of the (PHPMA115-b-PDMAEMA115) copolymer, and nanoparticle formation can be found in Wilson et al., 2022. Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 Briefly, plasmids containing the human IGF1 gene under control of the trophoblast-specific CYP19A1 promotor were mixed with the nonviral PHPMA115-b-PDMAEMA115 copolymer for 1 h at room temperature to form the hIGF1 nanoparticle. Details about physiochemical properties, and cellular safety and efficiency of the PHPMA115-b-PDMEAMA115 nanoparticle has been previously published, Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 and has been proven safe for both mother and fetus in numerous animal models. Reference Abd Ellah, Taylor and Troja17,Reference Wilson, Troja, Sumser, Maupin, Lampe and Jones19,Reference Wilson, Stephens, Lampe and Jones20 Finally, it is unlikely clinically that this nanoparticle gene therapy will be provided to a normally growing fetus. However, we have also shown that administration of this nanoparticle gene therapy to the placenta in a normal pregnancy environment results in down-regulation of decidual and placental mTOR signaling and growth factor gene expression in order to maintain placental homeostasis. Reference Davenport, Jones and Wilson23
Animal care and transuterine, intraplacental nanoparticle administration
Animal care and usage was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center (Protocol number 2017-0065) and University of Florida (Protocol number 202011236). Detailed information on animal care, maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) implementation, and ultrasound-guided transuterine, intra-placental nanoparticle administration can be found in Wilson et al., 2022. Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 Briefly, female (dams) Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were purchased and assigned to either a Control diet group (n = 7) where food (LabDiet diet 5025: 27% protein, 13.5% fat, and 60% carbohydrate as % of energy) and water was provided ad libitum, or MNR diet group (n = 12) where water was provided ad libitum, but food intake was restricted to 70% per kilogram body weight of the Control group from at least 4 weeks preconception through to mid-pregnancy (gestational day (GD) 30), thereafter increasing to 90% until term (GD65-70). Time mating with males was performed as outlined in Wilson et al., 2021, Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 and pregnancy confirmation ultrasounds performed at GD21 using a Voluson I portable ultrasound machine (GE) with a 125 E 12 MHz vascular probe (GE). At GD30–33 dams underwent ultrasound-guided, transuterine, intraplacental injections of either sham (200 µL of PBS; n = 7 Control and n = 5 MNR) or h IGF1 nanoparticle gene therapy (50 µg plasmid in 200 µL injection; n = 7 MNR + hIGF1). Dams were sacrificed 5 days after injection (GD35-38) by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cardiac puncture and exsanguination. Fetuses (Control: n = 4 female and 8 male fetuses, MNR: n = 7 female and 7 male fetuses, and MNR + hIGF1: n = 8 female and 11 male fetuses) and placentas were removed from the gravid uterus and weighed. Glucose concentrations in both maternal and fetal blood was measured using a glucometer. Fetal sex was determined by examination of the gonads and confirmed using PCR as previously published.20 Fetal livers were dissected, weighed, and halved to be either fixed in 4% w/v paraformaldehyde (PFA) or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
For assessment of steatosis and fibrosis, 5 µm thick sections of PFA-fixed, paraffin embedded fetal liver tissue were obtained, de-waxed, and rehydrated following standard protocol. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed as standard. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as previously described Reference Wilson, Stephens, Lampe and Jones20 to assess nuclear expression of Ki67 (Invitrogen MA5-14520; diluted 1:200), and nuclei were counter stained with hematoxylin. Following IHC staining, slides were imaged using the Axioscan (Zeiss) microscope, and 10 random 40× magnification images obtained using the Zen Blue software (Zeiss). For each image, cells positive for Ki67 (brown) and negative for Ki67 (blue) were counted using the Threshold and Watershed functions in ImageJ software Reference Schneider, Rasband and Eliceiri24 and averaged across the 10 images per slide to obtain a percentage positive result.
RNA isolations and quantitative PCR (qPCR)
For hepatic gene expression analysis, approximately 50 mg of snap frozen fetal liver tissue was lysed in RLT-lysis buffer (Qiagen) with homogenization aided by a tissue-lyzer. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen), and included DNase treatment following standard manufacturers protocol. 1 µg of RNA was converted to cDNA using the High-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) and diluted to 1:100. For qPCR, 2.5 µL of cDNA was mixed with 10 µL of PowerUp SYBR green (Applied Biosystems), 1.2 µL of KiCqStart SYBR Green Predesigned Primers (Sigma) at a concentration of 10 nM, and water to make up a total reaction volume of 20 µL. Gene expression was normalized using housekeeping genes β-actin and Rsp20 (See Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 ). qPCR was performed using the Quant3 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), and relative mRNA expression calculated using the comparative CT method with the Design and Analysis 2 v2.6.0 software (Applied Biosystems).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 27 software with female and male fetuses analyzed separately. Due to the small sample size, all data was assumed not normally distributed so generalized estimating equations with gamma log-link were used to determine differences between diet and nanoparticle treatment. Dams were considered the subject, diet, and nanoparticle treatment treated as main effects, maternal environment treated as a random effect and gestational age as a covariate. Litter size was also included as a covariate but removed as there was no significant effect for any of the outcomes. Statistical significance was considered at P ≤ 0.05. For statistically significant results, a Bonferroni post hoc analysis was performed. Results are reported as estimated marginal means ± standard error.
Results
Maternal nutrient restriction reduces fetal liver growth and results in brain-sparing at mid-pregnancy
The MNR diet resulted in decreased fetal weight in both females and males at mid-pregnancy, and there was no effect of hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment after 5 days (Fig. 1 a and 1b). Fetal liver weight as a percentage of fetal weight was decreased in MNR and MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment in female and male fetuses compared to Control (Fig. 1 c and 1d). There was evidence of brain-sparing, as indicated by increased fetal brain:liver ratio in female and male fetuses, in the MNR and MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment fetuses when compared to Control fetuses (Fig. 1 e and 1f).
Fig. 1. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on mid-pregnancy fetal growth parameters. A. MNR reduced mid-pregnancy fetal weight of female fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. B. MNR reduced mid-pregnancy fetal weight of male fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. C. MNR reduced mid-pregnancy fetal liver weight, as a percentage of fetal weight in female fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. D. MNR reduced mid-pregnancy fetal liver weight, as a percentage of fetal weight in male fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. E. MNR increased mid-pregnancy brain:liver weight ratio in female fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. F. MNR increased mid-pregnancy brain:liver weight ratio in male fetuses, and was not different with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. n = 7 Control dams (4 female and 8 male fetuses), 5 MNR dams (7 female and 7 male fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (8 female and 11 male fetuses). Data are estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval. P values calculated using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Maternal nutrient restriction reduces liver proliferation in female fetuses and is normalized with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment
Morphologically, there was no evidence of increased steatosis or fibrosis in the livers of either female or male fetuses with MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment (Fig. 2). In female fetal livers, MNR reduced proliferation, as evident by the percentage of cells positive for Ki67, of the hepatocytes when compared to Control, however percentage of cells positive for Ki67 in MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treated was comparable to Controls (Fig. 3 a). In male fetal livers, there was no effect of MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on proliferation of hepatocytes (Fig. 3 b).
Fig. 2. Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) stained fetal livers at mid-pregnancy with maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. There was no evidence of increased steatosis or fibrosis in the livers of either female or male fetuses with MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. H & E images are taken at 40× magnification, scale bar = 10 µm. n = 4 Control dams (4 female and 4 male fetuses), 5 MNR dams (5 female and 5 male fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (7 female and 7 male fetuses).
Fig. 3. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on mid-pregnancy fetal liver hepatocyte proliferation. A. In female fetal livers, MNR reduced the percentage of hepatocytes positive for Ki67 (brown nuclei) when compared to Control. However, percentage of hepatocytes positive for Ki67 in MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treated female fetal livers was comparable to Control. B. There was no effect of either MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on percentage of hepatocytes positive for Ki67 in male fetal livers. C. Representative images of Ki67 immunohistochemistry stained fetal livers, taken at 40× magnification; scale bar = 10 µm. n = 4 Control dams (4 female and 4 male fetuses), 5 MNR dams (5 female and 5 male fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (7 female and 7 male fetuses). Data are estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval. P values calculated using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05.
Expression of hypoxia markers is reduced with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment in MNR female fetal livers
In female fetal livers at mid-pregnancy, there was increased expression of growth factors Tgfβ, Ctgf, and Mmp2 with MNR when compared to Control (Fig. 4 a–4c). Expression of Tgfβ, Ctgf, and Mmp2 remained increased in the MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment compared to Control. On the other hand, expression of markers of hypoxia: Tnfα and Hif1α were increased in MNR female fetal livers when compared to Control, but decreased by hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment when compared to MNR, and towards comparable levels with Control female fetal livers (Fig. 4 d and 4e). qPCR analysis of growth factors and hypoxia markers in the mid-pregnancy male fetal liver showed no differences in expression with either MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment (Supplemental Fig. 1).
Fig. 4. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on mid-pregnancy female fetal liver growth factor and markers of hypoxia gene expression. MNR increased expression of transforming growth factor beta (Tgfβ: A), connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf: B), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (Mmp2; C) in female fetal livers compared to Control female fetal livers. hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment did not affect expression of Tgfβ, Ctgf, and Mmp2 which remained increased when compared to Control. MNR increased expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnfα; D) and hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (Hif1α; E) when compared to Control. hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment decreased expression in male MNR fetal liver tissue compared to MNR. n = 7 Control dams (4 female fetuses), 5 MNR dams (7 female fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (8 female fetuses). Data are estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval. P values calculated using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment increased fetal glucose concentrations in male fetuses at mid-pregnancy
We have previously reported no difference in maternal blood glucose levels at mid-pregnancy with either diet or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 There was no difference in fetal blood glucose concentrations in females and males between MNR and Control (Fig. 5 a and 5b). However, hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment increased fetal blood glucose concentrations when compared to Control and MNR, but only in male fetuses.
Fig. 5. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on mid-pregnancy fetal blood glucose levels. A. There was no difference in blood glucose concentrations in female fetuses with either MNR or hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. B. In male fetuses, there was no difference in blood glucose concentrations between Control and MNR, but hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment increased blood glucose concentrations compared to sham. n = 7 Control dams (4 female and 8 male fetuses), 5 MNR dams (7 female and 7 male fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (8 female and 11 male fetuses). Data are estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval. P values calculated using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05.
Fetal liver gene expression of insulin-sensing and gluconeogenesis enzymes is affected by MNR at mid-pregnancy, and normalized with placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment in male fetuses only
It has been hypothesized that developmental programming in the fetal liver that predisposes offspring to obesity and metabolic diseases is due to increased gluconeogenesis in the fetal liver that persists after birth. Reference Thorn, Brown, Rozance, Hay and Friedman15,Reference Jones, Rozance and Brown25 qPCR analysis of insulin-sensing and gluconeogenesis enzymes in the mid-pregnancy female fetal liver showed very few differences (Supplemental Fig. 2), with only IgfBP3 increased in MNR compared to Control, and returned to Control expression levels in the MNR + hIGF1 group (Estimated marginal mean + SEM of Relative Expression: Control = 1.15 + 0.22 vs. MNR = 2.10 + 0.06 vs. MNR + hIGF1 = 1.31 + 0.22; P-value Diet = 0.002, P-value Treatment = 0.005). In mid-pregnancy males, MNR increased expression of Igf1, and reduced expression of Igf2, G6pc and Pck1 when compared to Control (Fig. 6 a–6d, respectively). Furthermore, MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment returned mid-pregnancy liver expression of Igf1, Igf2, G6pc, and Pck1 to that, or towards that, of Control. Additionally, hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment increased male fetal liver expression of IgfBP1 and GcgR compared to Control and MNR (Fig. 6 e and 6f, respectively).
Fig. 6. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction (MNR) and hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on mid-pregnancy male fetal liver insulin sensing and gluconeogenesis enzyme gene expression. MNR increased expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf1: A), and decreased expression of Igf2 (B), glucose-6-phosphatase (G6pc; C), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (Pck1; D) in male fetal livers compared to Control male fetal livers. hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment restored expression of Igf1, Igf2, G6pc, and Pck1, toward or back to normal. hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment increased expression of Igf Binding Protein 1 (IgfBP1; E) and Glucagon Receptor (GcgR; F) compared to Control and MNR male fetuses. n = 7 Control dams (8 male fetuses), 5 MNR dams (7 male fetuses), and 7 MNR + hIGF1 nanoparticle dams (11 male fetuses). Data are estimated marginal means ± 95% confidence interval. P values calculated using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Discussion
Currently, there is no effective in utero treatment for FGR and thus, no clinical intervention that could potentially impact or prevent the increased risk of developing an NCD. In the present study, we show that MNR affects different physiological pathways depending on fetal sex; in females fetuses growth mechanisms are impacted compared to pathways involved in glucose production which are impacted in male fetuses. Moreover, we show short-term treatment of the placenta with hIGF1 nanoparticle gene therapy is capable of normalizing changes to fetal hepatic gene expression. Overall, this data provides further mechanistic understanding of how MNR and FGR affect hepatic gene expression and development and highlights the importance of understanding sex-specific risk windows during fetal development and potential considerations when developing pregnancy therapeutics.
The influence of fetal sex as a biological variable is well established. In human pregnancies, data consistently shows that risk of complications such as preterm delivery is higher in males compared to females. Reference Astolfi and Zonta26 In this study, fetal weight, and liver weight were decreased in female and male fetuses with MNR when compared to Control, an outcome routinely found in late-pregnancy in the guinea pig MNR model of FGR. Reference Elias, Maki, Matushewski, Nygard, Regnault and Richardson27-Reference Roberts, Sohlstrom and Kind29 However, at mid-pregnancy, and during the initial stages of FGR establishment, it was only in female fetal livers where MNR reduced liver hepatocyte proliferation, and increased the expression of growth factors and markers of hypoxia; expression remained comparable to Control in male livers. It has previously been reported in young adult male FGR offspring, that mRNA expression of Tgfβ, Ctgf, and Mmp2 were increased in liver tissue, Reference Sarr, Blake and Thompson30 however, females were not assessed. Traditionally, increased expression of these growth factors has been associated with the promotion of liver fibrosis in adulthood, Reference Nagaraja, Chen and Balasubramanian31 and increased expression would be considered detrimental to liver physiology. However, in mid-pregnancy fetal development, the pro-proliferative effects Reference Benyon and Arthur32 are likely positive for organ development, particularly given reduced liver weight as a percentage of fetal weight. Overall, our results suggest in the early stages of FGR induction, growth pathways are more disrupted than pathways relating to insulin-sensing and gluconeogenic enzyme expression in the livers of female fetuses, indicating that female fetuses prioritize supporting liver growth.
Under normal growth conditions, endogenous fetal glucose production is negligible because glucose supply from the placenta is sufficient. However, in cases of FGR the fetal liver increases gluconeogenesis, and thus glucose production, in order to maintain vital glucose supply to the developing organs. Reference Thorn, Brown, Rozance, Hay and Friedman15,Reference Jones, Rozance and Brown25 Others have shown increased hepatic gene expression of gluconeogenesis enzymes in growth restricted fetuses compared to normal fetuses in fetal sheep and rats in late-pregnancy, but did not separate fetal sex. Reference Gentili, Morrison and McMillen7,Reference Lane, MacLennan, Hsu, Janke and Pham8,Reference Thorn, Brown, Rozance, Hay and Friedman15 In our study, at the time of FGR establishment, there was reduced expression of gluconeogenic enzymes G6pc and Pck1, which may represent a compensation trigger for the increased expression seen in late-pregnancy in other studies. However, the decrease in G6pc and Pck1 expression was only observed in male fetuses. Adequate liver development and functionality ensures glycogen deposition and gluconeogenic ability, both of which are essential during the first stages of postnatal life. Reference Shelley, Bassett and Milner33 In the guinea pig fetal liver between GD30 and 40, the glycolytic rate is thought to be high, but there is little formation of glycogen and glucose, despite the expression of gluconeogenic enzymes. Reference Jones and Ashton12 Adaptations in liver development to adverse in utero environments, including blood flow and gene expression, whilst important to ensure short-term survival, may have longer-term detrimental consequences in the face of an enriched postnatal diet. Reference Haugen, Hanson, Kiserud, Crozier, Inskip and Godfrey34 Evidence from experimental models demonstrate responses to adverse in utero environments, with males affected to a greater extent than females, putting male offspring at higher risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Reference Muralimanoharan, Li and Nakayasu35 Overall, our data suggests that during the early stages of FGR establishment in males, insulin signaling and gluconeogenic enzyme expression is affected disproportionately compared to growth patterning and may be a key contributor as to why males are at higher risk of developing obesity diabetes in adulthood.
At time of FGR establishment in both female and male fetuses, changes in liver gene expression of some genes were normalized with short-term placenta hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment. We have previously shown the inability for both nanoparticle and plasmid to cross the placenta and enter fetal circulation, Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 thus any changes in fetal liver gene expression with placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment are indirect. During fetal development, there is multidirectional communication between mother, placenta, and fetus. Reference Murphy, Smith, Giles and Clifton36 Nutrients, oxygen and signaling factors like hormones, are transferred across the placenta, through the umbilical cord to the liver. Thus, the liver is the first organ which receives nutrient and oxygen rich blood from the placenta. Reference Godfrey, Haugen and Kiserud37 Presented here, there was increased expression of gluconeogenic enzymes, towards normal, in male fetal livers with placenta hIGF1 treatment when compared to sham. Analysis of the placental response to hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment shows increased expression of glucose and amino acid transporters, Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 likely resulting in increased glucose transport across the placenta, presenting a potential mechanism by which fetal liver gene expression of these enzymes is changed. Furthermore, placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment resulted in reduced expression of hypoxia markers in MNR female fetal livers. The molecular and physiological mechanisms behind the normalization of Hif1α and Tnfα are yet to be determined, however suggest the ability for the hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment of the placenta to result in reduced hypoxia in fetal livers. Our analysis of placental morphology with hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment indicates reduced interhaemal distance between maternal and fetal circulation likely resulting in increased oxygen diffusion, Reference Wilson, Lampe, Gupta, Duvall and Jones21 and a possible mechanism by which expression of Hif1α and Tnfα reduced.
The aim of this study was to assess the immediate, short-term impacts of placenta hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment on developmental programming in the fetal liver at the initial stages of FGR establishment. We have shown that secondary to placental treatment normalization of gene expression changes associated with MNR/FGR occurs. However, given the short time period, there was no significant improvement in fetal weight. Therefore, we are focusing our future research on performing multiple placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatments over a longer time period in mid-late pregnancy. Overall, this data shows a potential method by which an in utero treatment of the placenta can impact developmental programming and may prevent increased risk of diseases like cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, obesity, and diabetes in later life.
Supplementary materials
For supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174423000016
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs Craig Duvall and Mukesh Gupta for providing the co-polymer and Mrs Kristin Lampe for her assistance with the animal experiments.
Author Contributions
RLW conceived the study, performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote manuscript. KKS performed experiments, analyzed data, and edited manuscript. HNJ obtained funding, conceived the study, and edited manuscript. All authors approve final version of manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) award R01HD090657 (HNJ).
Competing Interests
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists
Ethics approval
Animal care and usage was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center (Protocol number 2017-0065).
Open access
