Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:47:54.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Process integration study of a milk powder plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Lindsay J. Robertson
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Alan J. Baldwin
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

A study was undertaken of the heat exchange possible in a milk powder plant consisting of milk treatment, a four-effect evaporator fitted with a thermovapour recompressor and a spray drier fitted with a fluidized bed secondary drier. The study utilized the techniques of process integration analysis and grand composite curve matching. Of particular interest was the optimum utilization of vapours within the evaporator. It was shown that with a minor redesign of the evaporator, and utilization of some vapour in the milk treatment section of the plant, a 6% reduction in total energy consumption of the milk powder plant was possible. If heat exchange between inlet and outlet air of the spray drier was not considered practical, preheating spray drier air with vapour from the evaporator resulted in a 10% reduction in energy consumption. Other minor heat exchange possibilities were also revealed. It was concluded that the use of vapour from the evaporator, and increased steam consumption in the evaporator, may lead in some designs to decreased plant thermal energy consumption overall. As well as the process integration study, formulae are presented for calculating the change in thermal economy of an evaporator when vapour is extracted for use in other sections of the plant. The use of process integration studies needs to be given consideration in overall design of energy-intensive dairy plant.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Deakin, A. & Kemp, I. 1988 Putting the pinch on dryer efficiency. Processing October 4952Google Scholar
Donhowe, D. P., Amundson, G. H. & Hill, G. G. 1990 Performance of heat recovery system for a spray drier. Journal of Food Processing Engineering 12 1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, J. R. & Linnhoff, B. 1979 Thermodynamic analysis in the design of process networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering 3 283291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, I. C. & Hart, D. R. 1987 Energy management—obligation or opportunity? Chemical Engineer No. 437 2629Google Scholar
Kessler, H. G. 1981 In Food Engineering and Dairy Technology, p. 222 (Ed. Kessler, H. G.). Freising: Verlag A. KesslerGoogle Scholar
Linnhoff, B. & Polley, G. 1988 Stepping beyond the pinch. Chemical Engineer No. 445 2532Google Scholar
Linnhoff, B., Townsend, D. W., Boland, D., Hewitt, G. F., Thomas, B. E. A., Guy, A. R. & Marsland, R. H. 1982 User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy. Rugby: Institution of Chemical EngineersGoogle Scholar
Linnhoff, B. A. & Turner, J. A. 1981 Heat-recovery networks: new insights yield big savings. Chemical Engineering 88(22) 5670Google Scholar
Linnhoff, B. & Vredeveld, D. R. 1984 Pinch technology has come of age. Chemical Engineering Progress 80(7) 3340Google Scholar
Lovell-Smith, J. E. R. & Baldwin, A. J. 1988 Energy saving opportunities in dairy manufacturing plant. Neiv Zealand Journal of Dairy Sciente and Technology 23 6174Google Scholar
Smith, G. & Patel, A. 1987 Step by step through the pinch. Chemical Engineer No. 442 2631Google Scholar
Steinmetz, F. J. & Chaney, M. O. 1985 Total plant process energy integration. Chemical Engineering Progress 81(7) 2732Google Scholar