Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:34:00.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of pre-milking teat dipping on clinical mastitis on dairy farms in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Eric Hillerton
Affiliation:
AFRO Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN, UK
Martin F. H. Shearn
Affiliation:
AFRO Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN, UK
Rachel M. Teverson
Affiliation:
AFRO Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Compton, Newbury RG16 0NN, UK
Susan Langridge
Affiliation:
Ciba Geigy Agriculture, Whittlesford, Cambridge CB2 4QT, UK
James M. Booth
Affiliation:
Genus Animal Health, Cleeve House, Lower Wick WR2 4NS, UK

Summary

Two trials were conducted to investigate the effect of pre-milking teat dipping (PMTD) on mastitis caused by environmentally associated pathogens. The first trial showed considerable variation in effect between herds, so a second, larger trial was conducted. In this second trial a comparison of the rate of clinical mastitis was made between nine matched pairs of dairy herds over 24 weeks of the winter housed period. All herds were near the national average incidence of mastitis before the trial. One member of each pair used their normal method of udder preparation throughout the trial and disinfected all teats after milking with an iodophor disinfectant. In the other nine herds the preparation of all teats, at all milkings, included dipping in a 0·25% available iodine disinfectant, which was left on the teat for 30 s. Every teat was then wiped with a paper towel before cluster attachment. There was no difference in the overall rate of mastitis or the incidence of mastitis caused by any particular type or group of pathogens between the trial groups of herds. Both groups showed a reduction in mastitis compared with the previous winter. Although there were apparent benefits in some pairs of herds there was no overall benefit. In comparison with the previous winter the control herds reported a greater reduction in mastitis than the PMTD herds. The effect of trial supervision on normal practice gave a benefit which overwhelmed any effect of PMTD. There appeared to be no effect of PMTD on the total bacterial count, cell count or iodine content of bulk tank milk. There appears to be no justification for wholesale use of PMTD although most farms and risk groups could benefit from better attention to conventional mastitis control.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baumann, H. 1990 Rapid and sensitive determination of iodine in fresh milk and milk powder by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry 338 809812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowey, R. W. & Collis, K. 1992 Effect of premilking teat disinfection on mastitis incidence, total bacterial count, cell count and milk yield in three dairy herds. Veterinary Record 130 175178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J. M. 1988 Update on mastitis. I. Control measures in England and Wales. How have they influenced incidence and aetiology. British Veterinary Journal 144 316322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bramley, A. J. & Dodd, F. H. 1984 Reviews of the progress of Dairy Science: Mastitis control—progress and prospects. Journal of Dairy Research 51 481512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bramley, A. J., Godinho, K. S. & Guindal, R. J. 1981 Evidence of penetration of the bovine teat duct by Escherichia coli in the interval between milkings. Journal of Dairy Research 48 379386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institution 1988 Milking machine installations. Specification for construction and performance. London: BSI (BS 5545 Part 2)Google Scholar
Hillerton, J. E., Bramley, A. J. & Watson, C. A. 1987 The epidemiology of summer mastitis; a survey of clinical cases. British Veterinary Journal 143 520530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1981 Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work. International Dairy Federation Bulletin no. 132Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1984 Recommended methods for somatic cell counting in milk. International Dairy Federation Bulletin no. 168Google Scholar
Pankey, J. W., Wildman, E. E., Drechsler, P. A. & Hogan, J. S. 1987 Field trial evaluation of premilking teat disinfection. Journal of Dairy Science 70 867872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowlands, G. J. & Booth, J. M. 1988 Methods of data collection and analysis for cases of clinical bovine mastitis. Proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, pp. 116125Google Scholar
Shearn, M. F. H., Langridge, S., Teverson, R. M., Booth, J. M. & Hillerton, J. E. 1992 The effect of premilking teat dipping on clinical mastitis. Veterinary Record (in press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrake, R. F. & Hoare, R. J. T. 1980 Effect of a disinfectant udder wash and a post-milking teat dip on the bacterial population of the teat end and on the rate of new intramammary infection. Journal of Dairy Research 47 253258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. L., Todhunter, D. A. & Schoenberger, P. S. 1985 Environmental mastitis: cause, prevalence, prevention. Journal of Dairy Science 68 15311553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilesmith, J. W., Francis, P. G. & Wilson, C. D. 1986 Incidence of clinical mastitis in a cohort of British dairy herds. Veterinary Record 118 199204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. D. & Kingwill, R. G. 1975 A practical mastitis control routine. International Dairy Federation Annual Bulletin no. 85 422438Google Scholar