Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:08:45.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of different lactation curve models fitted for milk viscosity recorded by an automated on-line California Mastitis Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

Anne-Christin Neitzel ,
Eckhard Stamer ,
Wolfgang Junge  and
Georg Thaller
Anne-Christin Neitzel*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Eckhard Stamer
Affiliation:
TiDa Tier und Daten GmbH, D-24259 Westensee, Germany
Wolfgang Junge
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Georg Thaller
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory somatic cell count (LSCC) records are usually recorded monthly and provide an important information source for breeding and herd management. Daily milk viscosity detection in composite milking (expressed as drain time) with an automated on-line California Mastitis Test (CMT) could serve immediately as an early predictor of udder diseases and might be used as a selection criterion to improve udder health. The aim of the present study was to clarify the relationship between the well-established LSCS and the new trait,‘drain time’, and to estimate their correlations to important production traits. Data were recorded on the dairy research farm Karkendamm in Germany. Viscosity sensors were installed on every fourth milking stall in the rotary parlour to measure daily drain time records. Weekly LSCC and milk composition data were available. Two data sets were created containing records of 187 692 milkings from 320 cows (D1) and 25 887 drain time records from 311 cows (D2). Different fixed effect models, describing the log-transformed drain time (logDT), were fitted to achieve applicable models for further analysis. Lactation curves were modelled with standard parametric functions (Ali and Schaeffer, Legendre polynomials of second and third degree) of days in milk (DIM). Random regression models were further applied to estimate the correlations between cow effects between logDT and LSCS with further important production traits. LogDT and LSCS were strongest correlated in mid-lactation (r = 0·78). Correlations between logDT and production traits were low to medium. Highest correlations were reached in late lactation between logDT and milk yield (r = −0·31), between logDT and protein content (r = 0·30) and in early as well as in late lactation between logDT and lactose content (r = −0·28). The results of the present study show that the drain time could be used as a new trait for daily mastitis control.

Keywords

Dairy cowdrain timelactation curve modelmodel evaluation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADR (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Rinderzüchter e.V.) 2013 Annual Statistics. Bonn, Germany: German Cattle Breeders FederationGoogle Scholar
Ali, AKA & Shook, GE 1980 An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 63 487–490Google Scholar
Ali, TE & Schaeffer, LR 1987 Accounting for covariances among test day milk yields in dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67 637–644Google Scholar
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G, Östensson, K & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2007 Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42 427–432Google Scholar
Bohmanova, J, Miglior, F, Jamrozik, J, Misztal, I & Sullivan, PG 2008 Comparison of random regression models with legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3627–3638Google Scholar
Burnham, KP & Anderson, DR 1998 Model Selection and Inference. A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York, NY: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttchereit, N, Stamer, E, Junge, W & Thaller, G 2010 Evaluation of five lactation curve models fitted for fat: protein ratio of milk and daily energy balance. Journal of Dairy Science 93 1702–1712Google Scholar
Cankaya, S, Unalan, A & Soydan, E 2011 Selection of a mathematical model to describe the lactation curves of Jersey cattle. Archiv Tierzucht 54 27–35Google Scholar
Dadpasand, M, Zamiri, MJ, Atashi, H & Akhlaghi, A 2012 Genetic relationship of conformation traits with average somatic cell score at 150 and 305 days in milk in Holstein cows of Iran. Journal of Dairy Science 95 7340–7345Google Scholar
Dodenhoff, J & Emmerling, R 2009 Genetic parameters for milkability from the first three lactations in Fleckvieh cows. Animal 3 329–335Google Scholar
Dohoo, IR & Meek, AH 1982 Somatic cell counts in bovine milk. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 23 119–125Google ScholarPubMed
Emanuelson, U, Danell, B & Philipsson, J 1988 Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell counts, and milk production estimated by multiple-trait restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 71 467–476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J, van Dorland, HA, Bruckmaier, RM & Schwarz, FJ 2011 Performance and metabolic profile of dairy cows during a lactational and deliberately induced negative energy balance with subsequent realimentation. Journal of Dairy Science 94 1820–1830CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haile-Mariam, M, Bowman, PJ & Goddard, ME 2001 Genetic and environmental correlations between test-day somatic cell count and milk yield traits. Livestock Production Science 73, 1–13Google Scholar
Heringstad, B, Chang, YM, Gianola, D & Klemetsdal, G 2003 Genetic analysis of longitudinal trajectory of clinical mastitis in first-lactation norwegian cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86 2676–2683Google Scholar
Heringstad, BR, Klemetsdal, G & Ruane, J 2000 Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. Livestock Production Science 64 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, D, Stamer, E, Junge, W & Kalm, E 2005 Genetic analyses of mastitis data using animal threshold models and genetic correlation with production traits. Journal of Dairy Science 88 2260–2268Google Scholar
Hogeveen, H, Kamphuis, C, Mollenhorst, H & Steeneveld, W 2010 Sensors and Milk Quality: The Quest for the Perfect Alert. The First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management 2010. Canada, March 2–5, 2010. Toronto, 2010 – p. 138–151, Wageningen UR.TorontoGoogle Scholar
Hossein-Zadeh, NG 2013 Comparison of non-linear models to describe the lactation curves of milk yield and composition in Iranian Holsteins. The Journal of Agricultural Science First 152 309–324Google Scholar
Jamrozik, J, Bohmanova, J & Schaeffer, LR 2010 Relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score in Canadian Holsteins from simultaneous and recursive random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 93 1216–1233Google Scholar
Kamphuis, C, Pietersma, D, van der Tol, R, Wiedemann, M & Hogeveen, H 2008a Using sensor data patterns from an automatic milking system to develop predictive variables for classifying clinical mastitis and abnormal milk. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62 169–181Google Scholar
Kamphuis, C, Sherlock, R, Jago, J, Mein, G & Hogeveen, H 2008b Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 91 4560–4570Google Scholar
Kennedy, BW, Sethar, MS, Moxley, JE & Downey, BR 1982 Heritability of somatic cell count and its relationship with milk yield and composition in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 65 843–847Google Scholar
Kitchen, BJ 1981 Bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research 48 167–188Google Scholar
Kocak, Ö & Ekiz, B 2008 Comparison of different lactation curve models in Holstein cows raised on a farm in the south-eastern Anatolia region. Archiv Tierzucht, Dummerstorf 51 329–337Google Scholar
Koeck, A, Miglior, F, Kelton, DF & Schenkel, FS 2012 Health recording in Canadian Holsteins: data and genetic parameters. Journal of Dairy Science 95 4099–4108Google Scholar
Leslie, KE, Dingwell, R, Yan, L, Bashiri, A & Johnstone, P 2007 An evaluation of Sensortec CellSense for determining udder health status in lactating dairy cattle. In National Mastitis Council 46th Annu. Mtg., pp. 232–233. San Antonio, Texas, Verona, WI: NMCGoogle Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD & Schabenberger, O 2006 SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Macciotta, NPP, Vicario, D & Cappio-Borlino, A 2005 Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empirical mathematical models. Journal of Dairy Science 88 1178–1191Google Scholar
Miller, RH, Norman, HD, Wiggans, GR, & Wright, JR 2004 Relationship of Test-Day Somatic Cell Score with Test-Day and Lactation Milk Yields. Journal of Dairy Science 87 2299–2306Google Scholar
Monardes, HG & Hayes, JF 1985 Genetic and phenotypic relationships between lactation cell counts and milk yield and composition of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68 1250–1256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Zas, SL, Gianola, D & Shook, GE 2000 Evaluation of models for somatic cell score lactation patterns in Holsteins. Livestock Production Science 67 19–30Google Scholar
Rupp, R & Boichard, D 1999 Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 82 2198–2204Google Scholar
SAS® (2010) SAS Institute Inc. User's Guide (release 9·2). SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC 27513, USAGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, LR & Jamrozik, J 2008 Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125 145–146Google Scholar
Schalm, OW & Noorlander, DO 1957 Experiments and observations leading to development of the California mastitis test. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 130 199–204Google Scholar
Schutz, MM, Hansen, LB, Steuernagel, GR, Reneau, JK & Kuck, AL 1990 Genetic parameters for somatic cells, protein, and fat in milk of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 73 494–502Google Scholar
Schwarz, G 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6 461–464Google Scholar
Sheldrake, RF, Hoare, RJT, & McGregor, GD 1983 Lactation stage, parity, and infection affecting somatic cells, electrical conductivity, and serum albumin in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 66 542–547Google Scholar
Van Der Werf, JHJ, Goddard, ME & Meyer, K 1998 The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records. Journal of Dairy Science 81 3300–3308Google Scholar
Welper, RD & Freeman, AE 1992 Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins, including lactose and somatic cell score. Journal of Dairy Science 75 1342–1348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteside, WH 1939 Observations on a new test for the presence of mastitis in milk. Canadian Public Health Journal 30 44Google Scholar
Whyte, D, Orchard, RG, Cross, PS, Frietsch, T, Claycomb, RW & Mein, AGA 2004 An On-Line Somatic Cell Count Sensor. In International Symposium for Automatic Milking Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Wiggans, GR & Shook, GE 1987 A lactation measure of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 70 2666–2672Google Scholar
Woloszyn, M 2007 Natural Variations of Milk Somatic Cell Count in Dairy Cows. In Department of Animal Nutrition and Management Uppsala Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, T, Hagiya, K, Takeda, H, Sasaki, O, Yamaguchi, S, Sogabe, M, Saito, Y, Nakagawa, S, Togashi, K, Suzuki, K & Nagamine, Y 2013 Genetic correlations between milk production traits and somatic cell scores on test day within and across first and second lactations in Holstein cows. Livestock Science 152 120–126Google Scholar