Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:23:23.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in human biology and child phonology: a response to Goad and Ingram*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

John L. Locke
John L. Locke*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
*
Neuro-linguistics Laboratory, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 15 River Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108–3402, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Goad & Ingram (1987) use the mere existence of inter-child variability to argue in favour of a ‘cognitive’, and against a ‘biological’ model of phonological development (Locke 1983). In this response it is suggested that such an argument fails to recognize the uniqueness of each individual's neural and vocal structures, ignores documented variability in the phonetic patterns of prelexical (and arguably prephonological) infants, and assumes–inexplicably–that inter-child variability implies the operation of ‘cognitive’ factors.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , October 1988 , pp. 663 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is indebted to Dawn Pearson, Michael Studdert-Kennedy, and Michael Smith for helpful remarks on an earlier version.

References

REFERENCES

Bouchard, T. J. & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science 212. 1055–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, B. J. (1972). Comparison of babbling patterns in normal and Down-syndrome infants. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 16. 35–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Goad, H. & Ingram, D. (1987). Individual variation and its relevance to a theory of phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 14. 419–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, J. L. & Marler, P. (1987). Learning by instinct. American Scientist 255. 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1980). The prediction of child speech errors: implications for a theory of acquisition. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1986 a). Speech perception and the emergent lexicon: an ethological approach. In Fletcher, P. & Carman, M. (eds), Language acquisition: studies in first language development. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1986 b). The linguistic significance of babbling. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterstrom, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1987). Instinct for phonology. International symposium on Language Acquisition and Language Impairment in Children, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Ferguson, C. A. (1983). Cognitive aspects of phonological development: model, evidence and issues. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 4. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pye, C., Ingram, D. & List, H. (1988). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiche. In Nelson, K. E. & Van Kleeck, A. (eds), Children's language. Vol. 6. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. & Oller, D. K. (1981). A comparative study of pre-meaningful vocalizations produced by normally developing and Down's syndrome infants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46. 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stampe, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonetic representation. Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 433–44.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language 11. 247–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Dunn, C. (1985). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1986). Sources of variability in early speech development. In Perkell, J. S. & Klatt, D. H. (ed), Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vihman, M., Ferguson, C. A. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: common tendencies and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 7. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar