Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:55:06.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding completion entailments in the absence of agency cues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2002

LAURA WAGNER
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

This study investigated the role that agency information plays in children's early interpretations of grammatical aspect morphology, in particular, the progressive -ing and simple past forms. Fifty-nine children (two-, four- and five-year olds) were presented with a forced-choice sentence-to-scene matching task very similar to the one used by Weist and colleagues (Weist, 1991; Weist, Wysocka & Lyytinen, 1991; Weist, Lyytinen, Wysocka & Atanassova, 1997), except that here the scenes contained only information about the relative completion of the object of the event and no information about the state of the agent of the event. In contrast to previous research, the children here did not succeed at this object-oriented task until as late as age five; moreover, also contra previous work, when they did succeed, their performance tracked the formal entailments of grammatical aspect. Thus, subjects consistently matched the perfective sentence to the completed event (reflecting the perfective's entailment of completion) but never consistently matched the imperfective sentence to either scene (reflecting the imperfective's lack of entailments). It is argued that agent-oriented meaning, in particular, intentionality, has priority in the mapping process over object-oriented completion entailments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research reported in this paper was supported by a fellowship from the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science at the University of Pennsylvania. My thanks go to IRCS, Lila Gleitman, Robin Clark, Henry Gleitman, Jesse Snedeker, Cristina Sorrentino, the Cheese group, the UMass developmental seminar and language acquisition lab, Dan Reynolds and the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers. The results reported here are part of my dissertation and have been presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development 24, November 1999.