Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:14:00.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refining transcriptions: the significance of transcriber ‘errors’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Clifton Pye ,
Kim A. Wilcox  and
Kathleen A. Siren
Clifton Pye
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kim A. Wilcox
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kathleen A. Siren*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
*
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work describes the importance of the transcription process in studies of speech and language acquisition. Using data collected from a hearing child of deaf parents, the three authors derived independent transcriptions of the same speech sample and systematically compared their transcripts with each other and with the best estimate of the speaker's actual productions. The resultant transcripts were used to produce two descriptions of this child's phonological system, one based on a liberal estimate and one on a conservative estimate of the potential error in the transcripts. Discussion includes suggestions for deriving percentages of inter-transcriber agreement and the utility of such figures as a metric of transcription difficulty as well as transcriber ability.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 17 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, N. & Fey, M. (1986). Analysis of the speech of phonologically impaired children in two sampling conditions. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 17. 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camarata, S. & Leonard, L. (1986). Young children pronounce object words more accurately than action words. Journal of Child Language 13. 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compton, A. J. & Hutton, J. S. (1978). Compton-Hutton Phonological Assessment. San Francisco CA: Carousel House.Google Scholar
Elbert, M. & McReynolds, L. (1979). Aspects of phonological acquisition during articulation training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 44. 459–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language 51. 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, B., Chin, L., Redmond, B. & Simpson, R. (1983). Phonological evaluation and remediation of speech deviations of a child with a repaired cleft palate: a case study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 48. 93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingram, D. (1981). Procedures for phonological analysis of children's language. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (in press). First language acquisition: method and explanation. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Klein, H. (1981). Productive strategies for the pronunciation of early polysyllabic lexical items. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 24. 389–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, J., Fox, D. & Brookshire, B. (1983). Phonological proficiency of two cleft palate toddlers with school-age follow-up. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 48. 274–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A. (1983). Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language development and language learnability. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiff-Myers, N. & Klein, H. (1985). Some phonological characteristics of the speech of normal-hearing children of deaf parents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28. 466–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, R., Leonard, L., Folger, M. & Wilcox, M. (1980). Early phonological behavior in normal-speaking and language disordered children: evidence for a synergistic view of linguistic disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 45. 357–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Hoffman, K. (1984). A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27. 456–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. & Oller, D. (1981). A comparative study of pre-meaningful vocalizations produced by normally developing and Down's Syndrome infants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46. 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1983). A longitudinal study of the development of stop consonant production in normal and Down's Syndrome children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 48. 114–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E. & Goldfield, B. A. (1983). Turn the page please: situation-specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10. 551–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1985). Phonetic inventories, 15–24 months: a longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28. 505–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed