Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:06:28.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The language bioprogram hypothesis revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Valerie Youssef
Valerie Youssef*
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad
*
Department of Educational Research & Development, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad, West Indies.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 451 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Lloyd B. (1982). Perfect as a universal category. In Paul, Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: between semantics pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3. 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1975). Creolization, linguistic universals, natural semantax and the brain. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 124–41.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 173–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. (1984). A bioprogram for language: not whether but how? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 190–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56. 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 2. 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1974). The cognition hypothesis. In Foss, B. (ed.), Neto perspectives in child development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. (1986). Testing the language bioprogram hypothesis: a review of children's acquisition of articles. Language 62. 878–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, G. & Koda, K. (1987). A Japanese child's use of Stative and punctual verbs. Journal of hild Language 14. 99–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, P. (1981). Description and explanation in the acquisition of verb forms. Journal of Child Language 8. 93–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedrich, P. (1974). On aspect theory and Homeric aspect. International Journal of American Linguistics. Memoir 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. (1986). The acquisition of the present perfect: explaining differences in the speech of Scottish and American children. Journal of Child Language 13. 537–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leech, G. (1970). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (1984). Stativity and the progressive. Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. (1974). The English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. A. (1984). Problems with similarities across creoles and the development of creoles. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 205–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, W. J. (1984). Do creoles prove what ordinary languages don't? The Behavioral and Brain Science? 7. 207–8.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (1984). The bioprogram hypothesis facts and fancy. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7. 208–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. & Weist, R. (1987). On the temporal contour of child language: a reply to Rispoli and Bloom. Journal of Child Language 14. 387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weist, R. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: on the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language 11. 347–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weist, R. (1986). Tense and aspect. In P. Fletcher and M. Garman (eds), Language acquisition: studies in first language acquisition.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the early years. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar