Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:58:52.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’ reinvestigated*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Anna Trosborg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper is concerned with establishing the relative difficulty involved in the acquisition of the temporal conjunctions before and after. It tries to control the influence on performance of the following variables: contextual support within a sentence (logically/arbitrarily ordered sequences), order of mention, syntactic complexity, task requirement variables, and memory load. In addition, experiments intended to throw light on the cognitive mechanisms underlying an understanding of these conjuctions are described. The concept of time is supposed to be spatial in origin. An understanding of relative time is dependent on ability to decentre and coordinate. Finally, it is suggested that reversible thinking (in a Piagetian sense) is involved in the process of making inverse sentence order agree with event order.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 381 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Author's address: University of Aarhus, Department of English, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

References

REFERENCES

Amidon, A. & Carey, P. (1972). Why five-year-olds cannot understand before and after. JVLVB 11. 417–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beilin, H. (1975). Studies in the cognitive basis of language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The comprehension and memory of sentences with temporal relations. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam, New York: North-Holland–American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1970). How young children describe events in time. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam, New York: North Holland–American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. JVLVB 10. 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, P. L. (1978). Syntactic and semantic factors in the acquisition of before and after. JChLang 5. 261–77.Google Scholar
Coker, P. L. & Legum, S. E. (1975). An empirical test of semantic hypotheses relevant to the language of young children. Working papers on the kindergarten program quality assurance. SWRL for educational research development (Los Alamitos, California).Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (1978). Language development as related to stage 6 object permanence development. JChLang 5. 173–91.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. & Sinclair, H. (1971). Temporal relationships in language. IntJPsych 6. 39–47.Google Scholar
French, L. A. & Brown, A. L. (1977). Comprehension of before and after in logical and arbitrary sequences. JChLang 4. 247–56.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. (1971). The young child's comprehension of time connectives. ChDev 42. 2111–13.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. L. (1975). The meaning of before and after for preschool children. JExpChPsych 19. 88–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, J. J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, R. D. (1979). Observations on the role of logically constrained sentences in the comprehension of before and after. JChLang 6, 353–9Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, T. E. & Harris, A. (1978). Language and thought in Piagetian theory. In Siegel, L. S. & Brainerd, C. J. (eds), Alternatives to Piaget. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1969). The child's conception of time. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scholnick, E. & Adams, M. (1973). Relationship between language and cognitive skills: passive voice comprehension, backward repetition, and matrix permutation. ChDev. 44. 741–6.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1971). What is involved in a genetic psychology? In Mischel, T. (ed), Cognitive psychology and epistemology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weil, J. (1970). The relationship between time conceptualization and time language in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar