Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:52:13.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between-word processes in child phonology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Joseph Paul Stemberger
Joseph Paul Stemberger*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
Department of Linguistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most processes in child phonology have as their domain a single word or a smaller chunk of phonological material. Processes that involve the interaction of two or more words have never been examined. In a diary study of the speech of one child acquiring English, there were eight between-word processes. All were optional and occurred in fairly restricted environments. Most of the processes were of short duration. Consequences for the study of child phonology are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 39 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported in part by NIH Training Grant NS-7134-06 to Indiana University and by a Graduate School Faculty Grant-in-Aid from the University of Minnesota. Part of the research was done while I was a postdoctoral student in Dave Pisoni's Speech Perception Laboratory at Indiana University. I would like to thank Pat Broen, Becky Treiman, Bruce Hayes, and the many participants at the Midwestern Child Phonology Conference (1986) for comments on parts of this work. Special thanks go to Gwendolyn Stemberger for tolerating the data collection.

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40. No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1983). French C/O alternations, extrasyllabicity, and lexical phonology. The Linguistic Review 3. 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for esearch in Child Development 41. No. 1.Google Scholar
Caldognetto, E. M. & Tonelli, L. (1984). Syllabic constraints on phonological speech errors in Italian. In Dressier, W. U. & Tonelli, L. (eds), Natural phonology from Eisenstadt. Padova: CLESP.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1986). The problem of transfer in nonlinear morphology. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 7.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV Phonology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25. 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. In M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen & G. Weismer (eds), Phonological theory and the misarticulation child. Monographs of the American Speech and Hearing Association 22.Google Scholar
Donahue, M. (1986). Phonological constraints on the emergence of two-word utterances. Journal of Child Language 13. 209–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, J. (1979). The goals of autosegmental phonology. In Dinnsen, D. A. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear approach. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der, & Smith, N. (1982). An overview of autosegmental and metrical phonology. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds), The structure of phonological representations. Part I. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1976). Phonological disabilities in children. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1978). The role of the syllable in phonological development. In Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (eds), Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Ingria, R. (1980). Compensatory lengthening as a metrical phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 465–95.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Phonetic cues to syllabification. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 29. 85–101.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1982). Re Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 435–82.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1985). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U. & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20. 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language production. Vol. 21. Development, writing, andotker language processes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Munson, J. & Ingram, D. (1985). Morphology before syntax: a case study from language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 12. 681–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklas, T. D. (1972). The elements of Choctaw. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. Press.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & Steriade, D. (1986). On geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 691–744.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R., Leonard, L. B., Wilcox, M. J. & Folger, K. (1980). Again and again: reduplication in child phonology. Journal of Child Language 7. 75–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N. (1973). The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1973). The sound pattern of Ancient Greek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1982). The nature of segments in the lexicon: evidence from speech errors. Lingua 56. 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (in press). Underspecification and constraints on geminates. Linguistic Inquiry 19.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. & MacWhinney, B. (1984). Extrasyllabic consonants in CV phonology: an experimental test. Journal of Phonetics 12. 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, D. (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Thrainsson, H. (1978). On the phonology of Icelandic preaspiration. Nordic Journal of inguistics 1. 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, G., Dinnsen, D. A. & Elbert, M. (1979). A clinical study of the voicing distinction and final stop deletion. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. D. (1889). Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar