Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T13:08:21.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The acquisition of newly emerging sociophonetic variation: /str-/ in American English*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

BEN RUTTER*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield

Abstract

Eight children aged 4;1–8;1 and their primary caregivers participated in a study designed to evaluate their use of the onset cluster /str-/ in both read and conversational speech. The cluster is currently undergoing a reported sound change in many varieties of English, with the initial /s/ being retracted to [ʃ]. The study compared the initial fricative of the cluster in both the children and their mothers. Acoustic analysis was carried out in order to categorize tokens as either [s] or [ʃ] using spectral peak analysis. Results found that children as young as 5;1 were starting to exhibit the usage patterns of their mothers. The distribution of the novel variant suggests that the children may be learning this form via a process of lexical diffusion rather than by rule. Implications for the study of dialect acquisition and phonological acquisition in general are discussed.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: University of Sheffield, 31 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S102TA, United Kingdom. e-mail: [email protected]

References

REFERENCES

Altendorf, U. (2003). Estuary English: levelling at the interface of RP and South-Eastern British English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bass, M. (2009). Street or shtreet? Investigating (str-) palatalisation in Colchester English. Estro: Essex Student Research Online 1(1), 1021.Google Scholar
Bauman-Waengler, J. (2012). Articulatory and phonological impairments: a clinical focus. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. Retrieved 1 May 2009, from <http://www.praat.org/>..>Google Scholar
Brown, G., Anderson, A. H., Shillcock, R. & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chater, N. & Manning, C. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 287–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damico, J. & Ball, M. J. (2008). Sociolinguistics. In Ball, M. J., Perkins, M., Muller, N. & Howard, S. (eds.), Handbook of clinical linguistics, 107–29. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J., Foulkes, P., Tillotson, J. & Watt, D. (2006). On the scope of phonological learning: issues arising from socially structured variation. In Goldstein, L., Whalen, D. H. & Best, C. T. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 8, 393421. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Durian, D. (2007). Getting [ʃ]tronger every day? More on urbanization and the socio-geographic diffusion of (str) in Columbus, OH. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2), 6579.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. (2010). Exploring social-indexical variation: a long past but a short history. Laboratory Phonology 1(1), 539.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J. & Watt, D. J. L. (1999). Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation in 2 to 4 year olds. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 7, 177206.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. & Watt, D. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1), 177206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: when learners change languages. Cognitive. Psychology 59, 3066.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: the emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34, 485–99.Google Scholar
Jongman, A., Wayland, R. & Wong, S. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(3), 1252–63.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W. (2000). /str/ ->/ʃtr/: Assimilation at a distance? American Speech 75, 8287.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. (2001). Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 123–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness. In Bod, R., Hay, J. & Jannedy, S. (eds.), Probability theory in linguistics, 177228. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reetz, H. & Jongman, A. (2009). Phonetics: transcription production, acoustics, and perception. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (1997). Acquisition of a variable rule: a study of (-t, d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24(2), 249–66Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2005). Acquisition of variation. In Ball, M. J. (ed.), Clinical sociolinguistics, 153–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. & Labov, W. (1995). Learning to talk Philadelphian: acquisition of short a by preschool children. Language Variation and Change 7, 101–12.Google Scholar
Rutter, B. (2011). Acoustic analysis of a sound change in progress: /str/ in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1), 2740.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. (1995). A case of distant assimilation: /str/-/ʃtr/. American Speech 70, 101–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, A. B. & Hand, L. (1997). The Smit-Hand articulation and phonology evaluation (SHAPE). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Durham, M. & Fortune, L. (2007). Mam, ma troosers is fa'indoon!' Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 9(1), 6399.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Durham, M. & Fortune, L. (2009). Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition. Language Variation and Change 21(1), 6995.Google Scholar