Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:41:55.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of adult input in young children's category evolution. I. An observational study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Carolyn B. Mervis*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Cynthia A. Mervis
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
*
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

Abstract

Three factors have been hypothesized to play an important role in the reduction of children's initial overextensions: spontaneous adult use of the correct label, correction of the child's errors, and demonstration of the important attributes that make an object a member of its adult category. The role of these factors was examined in relation to data collected from a longitudinal study of early lexical development. This study used an observational methodology combined with systematic comprehension and production testing. Results indicated that demonstrations were the most important factor in inducing toddlers to assign an object to its adult category. The question of why purely linguistic input initially plays a minor role in changing children's categories is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank the mothers and children who were involved in this study for their enthusiastic participation. Claudia Cardoso-Martins, Kimberlee Chamberlain, Patricia Christensen and Julie Nakamura assisted us with data collection and reduction. The theory presented in this paper has been improved by discussions with John Pani. Laurel Long and Nancy Myers provided helpful comments on a previous version of this paper. Portions of this paper were presented at the Third International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Austin, Texas, July 1984. Support for this project has been provided by the National Science Foundation, grants BNS 81-21169 and BNS 84-19036.

References

REFERENCES

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Banigan, R. L. & Mervis, C. B. (1988). Role of adult input in young children's category evolution. II. An experimental study. Journal of Child Language 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R. Q. (1964). The effect on the family of a limitation in coping ability in the child: A research approach and a finding. Merrill—Palmer Quarterly 10. 129–42.Google Scholar
Bell, R. Q. & Harper, L. V. (1977). Child effects on adults. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Benelli, B., D'Odorico, L., Levorato, C. & Simion, F. (1977). Formation and extension of the concept of a prelinguistic child. Italian Journal of Psychology 3. 429–48.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: the state of the art. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Chapman, K., Leonard, L. B. & Mervis, C. B. (1986). The effects of feedback on young children's inappropriate word usage. Journal of Child Language 13. 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1977). First language acquisition. In Morton, J. & Marshall, J. C. (eds), Psycholinguistics: Developmental and pathological. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1983). Meaning and concepts. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology. Vol. 3. Cognitive development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dougherty, J. W. D. (1978). Relativity and salience in categorization. American Ethnologist 5. 6680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillham, B. (1979). The first words language programme. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gruendel, J. M. (1977). Referential extension in early language development. Child Development 48. 1567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. M. (1963). Language, thought, and personality in infancy and childhood. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1982). Mother-child interaction and early lexical development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1983). Acquisition of a lexicon. Contemporary Educational Psychology 8. 210–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1984). Early lexical development: the contributions of mother and child. In Sophian, C. (ed.), Origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1985). On the existence of prelinguistic categories: a case study. Infant Behavior and Development 8. 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1986). Operating principles and personal theories: their roles in early lexical development. Paper presented at a meeting of the New England Child Language Association, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1987). Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. In Neisser, U. (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1983). Early language intervention: when and how. In Lewis, M. & Taft, L. T. (eds), Developmental disabilities: theory, assessment, and intervention. New York: SP Medical and Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In Neisser, U. (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38. 12, Serial No. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1972). Children and language: they learn the same way all around the globe. Psychology Today 6. 71–4, 82.Google Scholar