Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T13:59:08.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Private speech: evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Muriel Saville-Troike
Muriel Saville-Troike*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
*
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on children who go through a ‘silent’ period early in the course of second language development, during which they largely cease verbal communication with speakers of the second language (English). Video recordings with radio microphones under natural conditions revealed that most of these children engaged in extensive private speech, which they were found to use for a variety of intrapersonal learning strategies, including (1) repetition of others' utterances, (2) recall and practice, (3) creation of new linguistic forms, (4) paradigmatic substitution and syntagmatic expansion, and (5) rehearsal for overt social performance. Quantity and quality of private speech was related not only to the children's level of cognitive development and the difficulty of the learning task (confirming previous research), but also to the children's social orientation and learning style, and to the domain of knowledge (language) that was being acquired.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , October 1988 , pp. 567 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was supported in part by the Bureau of Educational Research and the Research Board of the University of Illinois. I am particularly grateful to Rey-Mei Chen, Soonai Ham, JoAnne Kleifgen, Keiko Koda and Ook Whan O, who collaborated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and to the teachers, children and parents who cooperated in the collection of the data. An earlier version was presented in April, 1987, at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum.

References

REFERENCES

Amodeo, L. B. & Cárdenas, M. (1983). Private speech production during task performance by bilingual and monolingual children. In Escobedo, T. H. (ed.), Early childhood bilingual education: a Hispanic perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bain, B. & Yu, A. (1980). Cognitive consequences of raising children bilingually: ‘One parent, one language’. Canadian Journal of Psychology 34. 304–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Ryan, E. B. (1986). A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In Forrest-Pressley, D. L., MacKinnon, G. E. & Waller, T. G. (eds), Mela-cognition, cognition and human performance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chen, R. -M. (1987). The private speech of a Chinese-English bilingual child: a naturalistic longitudinal study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Diaz, R. M. (1983). Thought and two languages: the impact of bilingualism on cognitive development. Review of Research in Education 10. 23–54.Google Scholar
Diaz, R. M. & Lowe, J. R. (1987). The private speech of young children at risk: a test of three deficit hypotheses. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2. 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, R. M. & Padilla, K. A. (1985). The self-regulatory speech of bilingual preschoolers. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Fantini, A. (1978). Bilingual behavior and social cues: case studies of two bilingual children. In Paradis, M. (ed.), Aspects of bilingualism. Columbia SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R. & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age. Child Development 37. 238–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. & Diaz, R. M. (1985). The relationship between degree of bilingualism and cognitive ability: a critical discussion of some new longitudinal data. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.) Children's language, Vol. 5. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (with Chin, H.-K.) (1985). Narrative play in second-language learning. In Galda, L. & Pellegrini, A. D. (eds), Play language and stories. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1966). On communicative competence. Paper presented at the Research Planning Conference on Language Development among Disadvantaged Children, Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar
Keeney, T. T., Cannizzo, S. R. & Flavell, J. H. (1967). Spontaneous and induced verbal rehearsal in a recall task. Child Development 38. 953–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, A. S. (1974). The use of private speech in young children and its relation to social speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J. & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: four studies and a review of theories. Child Development 39. 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd. New Haven CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H. (1979). The impact of the natural setting on private speech. In Zivin, G. (ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H. & Dyck, L. (1980). Preschoolers' private speech in a play setting. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 26. 219–29.Google Scholar
Sanches, M. & Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1976). Children's traditional play and child language. In Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (ed.), Speech play. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, G. (1980). Adding a second native language in the home. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1. 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1984). What really matters in second language learning for academic achievement? TESOL Quarterly 17. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1987). Dilingual discourse: communication without a common language. Linguistics 25. 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1988). From context to communication: paths to second language acquisition. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Discourse theory and application. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E. & Myhill, M. E. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and bilingualism. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C. & Herriman, M. L. (eds), Metalinguistic awareness in children: theory, research, and implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher order psychological processes, ed. by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Fillmore, C. J., Kempler, D. & Wang, W. S.-Y. (eds), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zivin, G. (1972). Functions of private speech during problem-solving in preschool children. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Zivin, G. (ed.) (1979). The development of self-regulation through private speech. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar