Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:48:11.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of subject–auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: an alternative analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2002

ROBERT D. VAN VALIN
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Abstract

Rowland & Pine (2000) present an analysis of the development of subject–auxiliary inversion in wh-questions in the speech of Adam from the Brown corpus. They show that there is an uninversion period in which the child fails to invert the subject and auxiliary in wh-questions, and they argue that this is a function of the frequency of wh-word+auxiliary collocations in the input: the more frequent a particular collocation is in the input, the more likely it is to be inverted in the child's speech. In this note an alternative analysis is proposed: the initial position of the tensed auxiliary signals interrogative illocutionary force, and the auxiliaries which are most reliably inverted are those that are overtly tensed morphologically. This analysis not only accounts for Rowland & Pine's data but also extends to inversion in yes–no questions. The analysis predicts three different patterns for the development of inversion in both types of questions, and it is shown that all three are attested.

Type
Note
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. I would like to thank Jeri Jaeger, Jean-Pierre Koenig and two anonymous referees for comments on an earlier draft.