Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:57:32.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's production of commissive speech acts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Janet W. Astington
Janet W. Astington*
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
*
Centre for Applied Cognitive Science, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 252 Bloor St West, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1V6, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study determined at what age and in what form children (aged 4;5 to 11;11) produce speech acts which commit them to some future action, by having them speak a doll's part in dialogues with the experimenter, who spoke for another doll. All children produced directive speech acts, indicating that the task was not too difficult for them, but only the commissive speech acts were analysed in detail. A majority of children at all ages produced at least one commissive speech act, but only the older children used the explicit performative verb promise to reassure the hearer of their commitment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 411 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank David Olson, Lynd Ferguson and Bill Postl for their advice during the progress of this research, and to acknowledge the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, through Doctoral Fellowship 453–84–0013, held at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

References

REFERENCES

Astington, J. W. & Olson, D. R. (1986). Metarepresentational language in the school: thought and talk about thought and talk. Paper presented at the 21st International Congress of Applied Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1975). Holophrases, speech acts and language universals. Journal of Child Language 2. 21–40.Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1977) Children's illocutionary acts. In Freedle, R. (ed.), Discourse comprehension and production. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1974). An analysis of vernacular performative verbs. In Shuy, R. W. & Bailey, C. J. (eds), Towards tomorrow's linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 2. 41–63.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review 66. 377–88.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1978). Effect of listener age and situation on the politeness of children's directives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 7. 307–17.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1977). Remarks on the lexicography of performative verbs. In Rogers, A., Wall, R. & Murphy, J. (eds), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions and implicature. Arlington VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ohmann, R. (1972). Instrumental style: notes on the theory of speech as action. In Kachru, B. B. & Stahlke, H. F. W. (eds), Current trends in stylistics. (Papers in linguistics: Monograph series 2.) Edmonton IL: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. & Astington, J. W. (1986). Children's acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In Demopoulos, W. & Marras, A. (eds), Language learning and concept acquisition. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Read, B. & Cherry, L. (1978). Preschool children's production of directive forms. Discourse Processes 1. 233–45.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11. 203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.), Language, mind and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1970). Say what you think. In Cowan, J. L. (ed), Studies in thought and language. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1979). Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. In Lee, V. (ed.), Language development. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar