Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:14:46.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cock of the School: A Cultural History of Playground Violence in Britain, 1880–1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

Jacob Middleton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Violence was an important part of the educational experience of many British children during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It principally took the form of playground fights, in which children competed in displays of physical prowess to win the accolade “cock of the school,” the term attached to the best fighter. This article examines the background to these fights using autobiographical accounts produced by individuals educated between 1890 and 1940. Working from common themes in these accounts, it explains the structure and context of schoolyard fights. In particular, it examines the manner in which contemporary notions of masculinity influenced the conduct of children. Fighting was a means by which a schoolboy could act out a fantasy of manhood and, through this, relate to his peers and the school environment.

Keywords

EducationViolenceSchoolsFightingMasculinityGenderFantasyBoxing
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 887 - 907
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hooley, Jim, A Hillgate Childhood (Stockport, 1981)Google Scholar, 14.

2 Glenwright, John, Bright Shines the Morning (London, 1949)Google Scholar, 9.

3 See, for instance, Flegel, Monica, Conceptualizing Cruelty to Children in Nineteenth-Century England (Farnham, 2009), 57–60Google Scholar.

4 Wood, John Carter, Violence and Crime in Nineteenth-Century England: The Shadow of Our Refinement (London, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 24.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid., 2.

7 Flegel, Conceptualizing Cruelty, 23–24.

8 Ibid., 148, 180.

9 Wiener, Martin J., Men of Blood (Cambridge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 11.

10 Wiener, Martin J., “The Victorian Criminalization of Men,” in Men and Violence: Gender, Honor, and Rituals in Modern Europe and America, ed. Spierenburg, Pieter (Columbus, 1998)Google Scholar, 198, 203.

11 Ibid., 198.

12 Emsley, Clive, Hard Men: The English and Violence Since 1750 (London 2005), 7–8Google Scholar. The documents in question were occurrence books and refused charge books. These were used to record events that demanded police attention yet did not lead to action being brought against those involved.

13 Carter Wood, Violence and Crime in Nineteenth-Century England, 94.

14 One sees this in late Victorian conceptions of self–defense, in which the notion of a gentlemanly fistfight was taken as a sign of civilization. See Godfrey, Emelyne, Masculinity, Crime and Self-Defence in Victorian Literature (Basingstoke, 2011), particularly 128–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Deslandes, Paul R., review of Hard Men: Violence in England Since 1750, Victorian Studies 49, no. 2 (Winter 2007): 334Google Scholar.

16 Wiener, Men of Blood, xi. Wiener is aware of this issue, pointing out that his work tackles what he calls a “statistically minor part” of criminality. See Wiener, Men of Blood, 7.

17 D'Cruze, Shani, “Unguarded Passions: Violence, History and the Everyday,” in Everyday Violence in Britain, 1850–1950: Gender and Class, ed. D'Cruze, Shani (Harlow, 2000)Google Scholar, 1.

18 Ibid., 12.

19 Mangan, J. A., Athleticism in the Victorian and Edwardian Public School (Cambridge, 1981), 18–32Google Scholar.

20 See, for instance, Bray, S. E., School Organisation (London, 1905)Google Scholar, 133.

21 See, for instance, Rose, Jonathan, The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes (New Haven and London, 2001), 168–69Google Scholar.

22 Smith, P. K., “Violence in Schools: An Overview,” Violence in Schools: The Response in Europe, ed. Smith, P. K. (London and New York, 2003), 1–2Google Scholar.

23 Silver, Harold, Education as History (London, 1983)Google Scholar, 21.

24 See, for instance, Middleton, Jacob, “The Experience of Corporal Punishment in Schools, 1890–1940,” History of Education 37, no. 2 (March 2008): 256–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Rose, The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes, 169.

26 Roberts, Brian, Biographical Research (Buckingham, 2002), 135–37Google Scholar.

27 Vincent, David, Bread, Knowledge and Freedom (London, 1981)Google Scholar, 6.

28 Donnelly, Peter, The Yellow Rock (London, 1950), 27–28Google Scholar.

29 Ausden, Ken, Up the Crossing (London, 1981)Google Scholar, 215.

30 Williams, James, Give Me Yesterday (Llandysul, 1971)Google Scholar, 35.

31 Paton, John, Proletarian Pilgrimage (London, 1935)Google Scholar, 36.

32 See Carter Wood, Violence and Crime in Nineteenth-Century England, particularly 92.

33 Howard, James, Winding Lanes (Caernarvon, 1938)Google Scholar, 28.

34 Wilde, Jimmy, Fighting Was My Business (London, 1938)Google Scholar, 20. See also Ezard, Edward, Battersea Boy (London, 1979)Google Scholar, 98.

35 Wilde, Fighting Was My Business, 20. See also Hannington, Walter, Never on Our Knees (London, 1967)Google Scholar, 20.

36 One of the most interesting manifestations of this was observed by Edward Ezard, who noted that in his school “it was considered legitimate to call in someone to fight for you” if a match would otherwise seem unfair. See Ezard, Battersea Boy, 98.

37 Kenney, Rowland, Westering (London, 1939)Google Scholar, 14. See also Brooks, Joseph Barlow, Lancashire Bred: An Autobiography (Cowley, 1950)Google Scholar, 56. One should note that this is distinctly different from the adult notion of a “fair fight,” in which kicking was seen as underhanded. See Wiener, Men of Blood, 55.

38 Dickens, Stan, Bending the Twig (Ilfracombe, 1975)Google Scholar, 39. See also Southgate, Walter, That's the Way It Was (London, 1982)Google Scholar, 44.

39 Ausden, Up the Crossing, 216–18.

40 Shaw, Sam, Guttersnipe (London, 1946)Google Scholar, 72.

41 “Authorship Unacknowledged,” Narrow Waters (London, 1935)Google Scholar, 28; Hewitt, Cecil Rolph, London Particulars (Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar, 91. The controversy was that Mrs. Maybrick was found guilty of murdering her husband despite being young and attractive, which, it was popularly believed, was an indicator of her innocence.

42 Bullock, Jim, Bowers Row: Recollections of a Mining Village (Wakefield, 1976)Google Scholar, 93.

43 Ibid., 94.

44 Bryans, Robin [“Robert Harbinson”], No Surrender: An Ulster Childhood (London, 1960)Google Scholar, 194.

45 Donnelly, The Yellow Rock, 28–29.

46 Williamson, Joseph, Father Joe (London, 1963), 33–34Google Scholar; Howard, Winding Lanes, 28.

47 See, for instance, Magee, Brian, Clouds of Glory (London, 2004)Google Scholar, 44.

48 Bryans, No Surrender, 194.

49 Mansbridge, Albert, The Trodden Road (London, 1940)Google Scholar, 11; Bryans, No Surrender, 194–95; Williamson, Father Joe, 34; Hannington, Never on Our Knees, 20.

50 Essays on Duty and Discipline: A Series of Papers on the Training of Children in Relation to Social and National Welfare (London, 1910)Google Scholar, 3.

51 See, for instance, “Punishment of Schoolboys,” Morning Advertiser, 25 January 1904, 6. “To Our Readers,” Brutalitarian (October 1904), 1.

52 Boyd, Kelly, Manliness and the Boys' Story Paper in Britain: A Cultural History, 1855–1940 (Basingstoke, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 67, 70–71.

53 Ibid., 67.

54 Rose, The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes, 322–23. Rose noted that of those boys whose education terminated at the age of fourteen, one in every eight books they read was a school story.

55 Ibid., 322–31.

56 O'Donovan, Michael [“Frank O'Connor”], An Only Child (London, 1961)Google Scholar, 120. There are many other examples from which one might choose; see, for instance, Willis, Frederick, Peace and Dripping Toast (London, 1950), 56–57Google Scholar.

57 West, Paul, I, Said the Sparrow (London, 1963)Google Scholar, 44. It is, of course, important to note that literature can be both an expression of popular culture and a means by which it was transmitted. It was possible to reject such literature yet still respond to the underlying cultural forces that were responsible for its production.

58 O'Donovan, An Only Child, 127.

59 Mangan, Athleticism in the Victorian and Edwardian Public School, particularly 22–23.

60 Dent, E. B., Boxing for Boys (Aldershot, 1920)Google Scholar, n.p.

61 See, in particular, Williams, Give Me Yesterday, 36.

62 Carter Wood, Violence and Crime in Nineteenth-Century England, 86–87.

63 Donnelly, The Yellow Rock, 28.

64 O'Reilly, Septimus, The Tiger of the Legion (London, 1936)Google Scholar, 18. O'Reilly was not the only individual who claimed that dispensing with preliminaries and simply attacking an opponent was an effective tactic; a similar notion was put forward by Cecil Rolph Hewitt. See Hewitt, London Particulars, 89.

65 Giscard, John, A Place of Stones (London, 1958)Google Scholar, 117.

66 See, for instance, Brown, William, So Far … (London, 1943)Google Scholar, 26.

67 Goldman, William, East End My Cradle (London, 1940)Google Scholar, 31–32.

68 Magee, Clouds of Glory, 44.

69 Mansbridge, The Trodden Road, 11–12.

70 See, for instance, Rodaway, Angela, A London Childhood (London, 1960),Google Scholar 53; Gibney, Josephine, Joe McGarrigle's Daughter (Kineton, 1977)Google Scholar, 71.

71 The reader should note that this includes the autobiographies of female writers, though the exceptions are revealing.

72 A particularly good example of this is provided in Whittaker, James, I James Whittaker (London, 1934), 23–25Google Scholar.

73 Darby, Aubrey, A View From the Alley (Luton, 1974)Google Scholar, 10.

74 Herringham, W. P., “On Physical Training in Schools,” in Two Addresses Delivered Before the Medical Officers of Schools Association (London, 1906)Google Scholar, 1. On rifle training, see T. C. Horsfall, “The Influence on National Life of Military Training in Schools,” in Two Addresses Delivered Before the Medical Officers of Schools Association; A. G. Grenfell, “Teaching Schoolboys to Shoot,” Liverpool Daily Post and Liverpool Mercury (8 August 1905), 7; Perris, H. S., Rifles and Education: A Record and Appeal (London, 1907)Google Scholar. The subject is fully explored in Penn, Alan, Targeting Schools: Drill, Militarism and Imperialism (London, 1999)Google Scholar, particularly 165–68.

75 Hodge, H., It's Draughty Up Front (London, 1938)Google Scholar, 36. It is interesting to note that, at the beginning of the twentieth century, the School Board for London made provisions for memorials inside school buildings to commemorate “heroic” acts by pupils. See “Records of Acts of Heroism and Self-Sacrifice,” School Board for London Gazette (29 May 1900), 148–49.

76 Spring, Howard, Heaven Lies About Us: A Fragment of Infancy (London, 1939)Google Scholar, 19.

77 “Notes,” Board Teacher (1 January 1901), 7. See also Winch, William, Problems in Education (London, 1900), 146–47Google Scholar.

78 Dexter, T. F. G. and Garlick, A. H., A Primer of School Method (London, 1905)Google Scholar, 15.

79 Short, Edward, I Knew My Place (London, 1983), 21–22Google Scholar.

80 See Lawrence, Jon, “Forging a Peaceable Kingdom: Violence, and Fear of Brutalization in Post–First World War Britain,” Journal of Modern History 75, no. 3 (September 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lawrence suggests that the issue of brutalization was subject to broad public discussion, although the substance of his article actually focuses on the more interesting issue of the deployment of notions of brutalization in British political debate in the immediate post war period.

81 Kirkup, James, Sorrows, Passions and Alarms (London, 1959)Google Scholar, 64.

82 Ezard, Battersea Boy, 98. This is reflected in punishment books of the era, where entries that relate to playground fights are infrequent. For instance, the punishment book for Salters Hill Boys' School in London covers 1,544 acts of punishment over a period of three years, from the beginning of 1927 to the end of 1929, yet only five instances of punishment relate to fighting. See Salter's Hill School Punishment Book, f. EO/DIV8/SAL/MISC/3, London Metropolitan Archive.

83 Ibid. See also Spencer, F. H., An Inspector's Testament (London, 1938)Google Scholar, 69.

84 Jones, Abel, I Was Privileged (Cardiff, 1943)Google Scholar, 7.

85 Salter's Hill School Punishment Book, f. EO/DIV8/SAL/MISC/2, London Metropolitan Archive.

86 Giscard, A Place of Stones, 39–41.

87 Armitage, Marc, “The Influence of School Architecture and Design on the Outdoor Play Experience within the Primary School,” Paedagogica Historica 41, no. 4 (August 2005): 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

88 Further Reports of Assistant Commissioners on Popular Education in England, (London, 1861)Google Scholar, 545; Appendix to Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Commissioners on Popular Education, (London, 1861)Google Scholar, 91.

89 Besant, Annie, Education as the Basis of National Life (Madras, 1908)Google Scholar, 10.

90 Barnett, P. A., Common Sense in Education (London, 1899)Google Scholar, 61.

91 Blathwayt, Raymond, “Sentimental England,” in Essays on Duty and Discipline: A Series of Papers on the Training of Children in Relation to Social and National Welfare (London, 1910)Google Scholar, 3.

92 Magee, Clouds of Glory, 48.

93 Kenney, Westering, 14.

94 See, for instance, Pearson, Geoffrey, Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears (London 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, particularly 7–11.

95 Stearns, Peter, “Men, Boys and Anger in American Society, 1860–1940,” in Manliness and Morality: Middle-Class Masculinity in Britain and America, 1800–1940, ed. Mangan, J. A. and Walvin, James (Manchester, 1987)Google Scholar, 87.

96 West, I, Said the Sparrow, 44. See also Bullock, Bowers Row, 94.

97 Kenney, Westering, 13. See also, Brooks, Lancashire Bred, 56.

98 Kirkup, Sorrows, Passions and Alarms, 64.

99 Kenney, Westering, 13. See also ln Guest, Francis [“James Spencer”], Limey Breaks In (London, 1934)Google Scholar, 7.

100 Garratt, V. W., A Man in the Street (London, 1939), 25–26Google Scholar.

101 Kirkup, Sorrows, Passions and Alarms, 64.

102 Brooks, Lancashire Bred, 55.

103 Tremewan, Tom, Cornish Youth: Memories of a Perran Boy (Truro, 1968), 12–13Google Scholar.

104 Bryans, No Surrender, 194.

105 Ibid., 195.

106 Ibid., 196.

107 Goldman, East End My Cradle, 31–32.

108 See Horrocks, William, Reminiscences of Bolton (Swinton, 1984)Google Scholar, 15.

109 See, for instance, Middleton, Jacob, “The Cry for Useless Knowledge: Fear of Over-education in Late Nineteenth-Century England,” History of Education Researcher 76 (November 2005): 97–98Google Scholar; Tosh, John, Manliness and Masculinities in Nineteenth-Century Britain (Harlow, 2005)Google Scholar, 204.

110 Boyd, Manliness and the Boys' Story Paper in Britain, 72–73.

111 Bourke, Joanna, An Intimate History of Killing (London, 1999)Google Scholar, 21.

112 Ibid., 20, 53–54.

113 O'Donovan, An Only Child, 211.

114 See, for instance, Wiener, “The Victorian Criminalization of Men,” 200.

115 J. A. Mangan and James Walvin, introduction to Manliness and Morality: Middle-Class Masculinity in Britain and America 1800–1940, 2.

116 Although not without its proponents: James Hipkiss, in the 1941 book, Unarmed Combat, promised on the cover that the martial art ju-jitsu was “your answer to invasion.” That we now find the idea of fighting off panzer divisions with the use of martial arts absurd is a sign that we inhabit a different economy of violence than Hipkiss. See Hipkiss, James, Unarmed Combat (London, 1941)Google Scholar.

117 Opie, Iona and Opie, Peter, The Lore and Language of School Children (Oxford, 1959), 196–97Google Scholar. The authors noted that “cock of the school” was retained only in northern England.

118 Brooks, Lancashire Bred, 56. See also, West, I Said the Sparrow, 43–44.