Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:23:58.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GETTING READY FOR THE MARRIAGE MARKET? A REJOINDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2012

FLORIAN GRIMPS  and
BJÖRN SCHNEIDER
FLORIAN GRIMPS
Affiliation:
University of Heidelberg, Germany
BJÖRN SCHNEIDER
Affiliation:
University of Heidelberg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

There is an obvious need for better understanding of people's motives for body weight change, due to the importance of the health-related, social and economic consequences of obesity. In particular, exploration of little-discussed social aspects could provide further insights, but requires, however, close examination. This also applies to the study of the effect of marriage-market-related incentives and divorce risks on individual body mass index (BMI). Nevertheless, the ongoing debate about whether and to what extent the risk of divorce influences the body constitution of middle-aged individuals has as yet failed to mature into a common agreement. This paper will therefore re-examine theoretical assumptions and statistical calculations to clarify still contentious points. Finally, the results of this study suggest once more that there is no significant relationship between country-specific divorce risk and BMI among married individuals in Europe.

Type
Debate
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 243 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, S. R. (2001) Analysis of complex survey data using SAS. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 64, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Font, J. C., Fabbri, D. & Gil, J. (2010) Decomposing cross-country differences in levels of obesity and overweight: does the social environment matter? Social Science & Medicine 70, 1185–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., Edwardes, M. D. de B. & Forrester, J. E. (2003) Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology 157, 364–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, P. B. & Kopp, J. (2006) Familiensoziologie. Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Hox, J. J. (2002) Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, T. (2011) ‘Durch Dick und Dünn’. Zum Einfluss von Partnerschaft und Partnermarkt auf das Körpergewicht. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, K. & Zeger, S. L. (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundborg, P., Nystedt, P. & Lindgren, B. (2007) Getting ready for the marriage market? The association between divorce risks and investments in attractive body mass among married Europeans. Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundborg, P., Nystedt, P. & Lindgren, B. (2012) Getting ready for the marriage market? A response. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD Health Data (2010) OECD Health Data. Version: October 2010. URL: http://www.ecosante.fr/index2.php?base=OCDE&langh=ENG&langs=ENG&sessionid=.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. & Grimps, F. (2012) Getting ready for the marriage market? A comment. Journal of Biosocial Science 44, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobal, J. (2001) Social and cultural influences on obesity. In Bjorntorp, P. (ed.) International Textbook of Obesity. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, J. (2006) Die Verfügbarkeit partnerschaftlich gebundener Akteure für den Partnermarkt. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 58, 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Statistic Division (2007) United Nations Statistic Division. Percent Divorced/Separated in Age Group. URL: http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=divorce&d=GenderStat&f=inID%3a23.Google Scholar