Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:23:24.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GETTING READY FOR THE MARRIAGE MARKET? A RESPONSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2011

PETTER LUNDBORG ,
PAUL NYSTEDT  and
BJÖRN LINDGREN
PETTER LUNDBORG
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Lund University, Sweden
PAUL NYSTEDT
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Linköping University, Sweden
BJÖRN LINDGREN
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden National Bureau of Economic Research, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Overweight and obesity constitute a major and increasing health and welfare problem throughout the world. Assessing the multifaceted mechanisms – biological, environmental and behavioural – behind this development is a crucial task in medical, social and economic sciences. We are, therefore, grateful to have been given the opportunity to, once again, discuss whether the risk of divorce may be one of the factors influencing the incentives of becoming overweight or obese and, hence, ultimately the physical appearance among the married. In this Debate, colleagues Schneider and Grimps present the results of a multilevel analysis, in which they could not identify any statistically significant association between body mass index (BMI) and divorce risk among married people. Thus, they question the findings, previously published in this Journal (Lundborg et al., 2007). The Schneider and Grimps arguments are not convincing, however. So, we still claim that the statistical material at hand does, indeed, imply that divorce risk at the national level may well influence the weight of the married.

Type
Debate
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 235 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrist, J. & Pischke, J-S. (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averett, S. & Korenman, S. (1996) The economic reality of The Beauty Myth. Journal of Human Resources 31, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gortmaker, S. L., Must, A., Perrin, J. M., Sobol, A. M. & Dietz, W. H. (1993) Social and economic consequences of overweight in adolescence and young adulthood. New England Journal of Medicine 329, 1008–1012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hox, J. (1998) Multilevel modelling: when and why. In Balderjahn, I., Mathar, R. & Schader, M. (eds) Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundborg, P., Nystedt, P. & Lindgren, B. (2007) Getting ready for the marriage market? The association between divorce risks and investments in attractive body mass among married Europeans. Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maas, C. & Hox, J. (2004) Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica 58 (2), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L. (2007) Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiological Review 29, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobal, J. & Stunkard, A. J. (1989) Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin 105, 260–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed