Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:19:41.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Mixture Representation of the Conditional Residual Lifetime of a Coherent System

Part of: Special processes Distribution theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Xiuying Feng ,
Shuhong Zhang  and
Xiaohu Li
Xiuying Feng*
Affiliation:
Lanzhou University
Shuhong Zhang*
Affiliation:
Lanzhou University
Xiaohu Li*
Affiliation:
Xiamen University
*
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
∗∗∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper builds a mixture representation of the reliability function of the conditional residual lifetime of a coherent system in terms of the reliability functions of conditional residual lifetimes of order statistics. Some stochastic ordering properties for the conditional residual lifetime of a coherent system with independent and identically distributed components are obtained, based on the stochastically ordered coefficient vectors.

Keywords

Coherent systemorder statisticsresidual lifetimesignaturestochastic order

MSC classification

Primary: 62E15: Exact distribution theory
Secondary: 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 475 - 485
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Balakrishnan, N., Belzunce, F., Hami, N. and Khaledi, B. E. (2010). Univariate and multivariate likelihood ratio ordering of generalized order statistics and associated conditional variables. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 24, 441–455.Google Scholar
Belzunce, F., Gurler, S. and Ruiz, J. M. (2011). Revisiting multivariate likelihood ratio ordering results for order statistics. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 25, 355–368.Google Scholar
Eryılmaz, S. (2013). On residual lifetime of coherent systems after the rth failure. Statist. Papers 54, 243–250.Google Scholar
Gertsbakh, I., Shpungin, Y. and Spizzichino, F. (2012). Two-dimensional signatures. J. Appl. Prob. 49, 416–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goliforushani, S., Asadi, M. and Balakrishnan, N. (2012). On the residual and inactivity times of the components of used coherent systems. J. Appl. Prob. 49, 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity, Vol. I. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Khaledi, B.-E. and Shaked, M. (2007). Ordering conditional lifetimes of coherent systems. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 137, 1173–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S. and Xu, M. (2010). On residual lifetimes of k-out-of-n systems with nonidentical components. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 24, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S., Mukerjee, H. and Samaniego, F. J. (1999). The “signature” of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Res. Logistics 46, 507–523.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Zhang, Z. (2008). Some stochastic comparisons of conditional coherent systems. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 24, 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoudi, M. and Asadi, M. (2011). The dynamic signature of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60, 817–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, N. and van der Meulen, E. C. (2003). On stochastic properties of m-spacings. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 115, 683–697.Google Scholar
Navarro, J., Balakrishnan, N. and Samaniego, F. J. (2008). Mixture representations of residual lifetimes of used systems. J. Appl. Prob. 45, 1097–1112.Google Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2010). The Joint signature of coherent systems with shared components. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F. J. and Balakrishnan, N. (2011). Signature-based representations for the reliability of systems with heterogeneous components. J. Appl. Prob. 48, 856–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-34, 69–72.Google Scholar
Samaniego, F. J. (2007). System Signatures and Their Applications in Engineering Reliability. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F. J., Balakrishnan, N. and Navarro, J. (2009). Dynamic signatures and their use in comparing the reliability of new and used systems. Naval Res. Logistics 56, 577–591.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2010). Mixture representations of inactivity times of conditional coherent systems and their applications. J. Appl. Prob. 47, 876–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2011). Ordering new conditional residual lifetimes of k-out-of-n systems. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 40, 1591–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. and Li, X. (2010). Some new result on stochastic orders and aging properties of coherent systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59, 718–724.Google Scholar