Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:01:31.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bunching in a semi-Markov process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

A. G. Hawkes*
Affiliation:
University of Durham

Extract

In the type II counter with constant deadtime, particles which arrive within some constant time τ following another particle are unrecorded. We can think of this process as an alternating sequence of gaps and bunches of events. Gaps have duration > τ, while the intervals between any successive pair of events within a bunch are all ≦ τ. Counter theory is usually concerned with the distribution of intervals between recorded events (i.e., the first event of each bunch) and the distribution of the number of recorded events in a given time interval. In the case where the events form a renewal process this has been studied intensively by Pyke [2], Smith [5] and Takács [6].

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bartlett, M.S. (1955) An Introduction to Stochastic Processes. Cambridge.Google Scholar
[2] Pyke, R. (1958) On renewal processes related to type I and type II counter models. Ann. Math. Statist. 29, 737754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Pyke, R. (1961) Markov renewal processes: definitions and preliminary properties. Ann. Math. Statist. 32, 12311242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Pyke, R. (1961) Markov renewal processes with finitely many states. Ann. Math. Statist. 32, 12431259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Smith, W.L. (1957) On renewal theory, counter problems, and quasi-Poisson processes Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 53, 175193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Takács, L. (1956) On a probability problem arising in the theory of counters. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 52, 488498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar