Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:33:53.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on the need for copper in the diet of fattening pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Braude
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The results of two trials involving twenty-four pigs did not provide a clue to the observed craving of pigs for metallic copper.

2. There seems to be no advantage in supplementing a normal diet for fattening pigs which contains about 5 p.p.m. of copper with copper given in form of a solution of copper sulphate. The addition of a mixture of copper sulphate, manganese sulphate and iron pyrophosphate to the same normal diet had also no effect on the rate of growth of the pigs and their food consumption.

3. The haemoglobin and copper contents of the blood appeared to be unaffected by the addition of copper to the diet. The copper content of the livers showed a tendency to be higher in the livers of the pigs receiving the copper supplements.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1945 , pp. 163 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annual Report of the Iowa Experimental Station (1929).Google Scholar
Ball, E. G. (1942). Ann. Rev. Biochem. 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. & Foot, A. S. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 73.Google Scholar
Eden, A. & Green, H. H. (1940). Biochem. J. 34, 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvehjem, C. A. (1935). Physiol. Rev. 15, 3, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1930). Bull. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 410.Google Scholar
Foot, A. S. & Thompson, S. Y. (1938). J. Minist. Agric. 45, 5, 452.Google Scholar
Hart, E. B., Steenbock, H., Waddel, J. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1928). J. Biol. Chem. 77, 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, E. B., Elvehjem, C. A. & Steenbock, H. (1930). J. Nutrit. 2, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. & Mann, T. (1944). Proc. Nutrit. Soc. 1, 3/4, 189.Google Scholar
Orr, J. B. (1935). Proc. R. Soc. Med. 28.Google Scholar
Russell, F. C. (1944). Tech. Commun. Bur. Anim. Nutrit., Aberd., no. 15.Google Scholar
Schultze, M. O. (1940). Physiol. Rev. 20, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, S. L. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, S. L. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 481.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. (1940). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 9, 515.Google Scholar