Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:15:43.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of application technique and anaerobic digestion on gaseous nitrogen loss from animal slurry applied to ryegrass (Lolium perenne)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. H. Rubæk ,
K. Henriksen ,
J. Petersen ,
B. Rasmussen  and
S. G. Sommer
G. H. Rubæk
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum
K. Henriksen
Affiliation:
Environmental Engineering Laboratory, University of Aalborg, Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
J. Petersen
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum
B. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Environmental Engineering Laboratory, University of Aalborg, Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
S. G. Sommer
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ammonia volatilization and denitrification were measured in a ryegrass field in Denmark after direct injection and application with trail hoses of an untreated cattle slurry and an anaerobically digested slurry in late May-early June 1993 and 1994. Ammonia volatilization was measured using a windtunnel system for a period of 8 days after slurry application. Denitrification was measured for a period of 21 days after slurry application. In an adjacent field experiment, nitrogen-uptake (N-uptake) was determined in the first two cuts of the ryegrass harvested after slurry application. N losses through ammonia volatilization were larger in 1993 than in 1994 due to differences in climatic conditions. Ammonia volatilization was lowered substantially (47–72%), when slurry was injected compared with surface application. In 1993 the loss from surface-applied digested slurry was only 35% of total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN), while the loss from the raw slurry was 47%. There were no significant differences in ammonia volatilization from the two slurry types in the other experiments. N losses through denitrification were low (< 2% of TAN), but there were clear differences in the losses, depending on slurry type, application method and experimental year. Injection of the slurry gave a larger N-uptake in the first cut of grass compared to the trail-hose application. In 1993 N-uptake from the digested slurry treatment gave significantly larger N-uptake compared to the raw slurry in the first cut.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 126 , Issue 4 , June 1996 , pp. 481 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bisdom, E. B. A., Dekker, L. W. & Schoute, J. F. Th. (1993). Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56, 105–118.Google Scholar
Comfort, S. D., Killing, K. A., Keeney, D. R. & Converse, J. C. (1990). Nitrous oxide production from injected liquid dairy manure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54, 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooke, W. M. & Simpson, W. E. (1971). Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Energistyrelsen, (1991). Biogasfællesanlag. Hovedrapport fra koordineringsudvalget for biogasfællesanlæg. Kobenhavn: Energistyrelsen (in Danish).Google Scholar
Hansen, B. (1989). Determination of nitrogen as elementary N, an alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 39, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. (1976). Jordtyper ved statens forsøgsstationer. Tidsskrift for Planteavl 80, 742–758 (in Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
Husted, S., Jensen, L. S. & Jørgensen, S. S. (1991). Reducing ammonia loss from cattle slurry by use of acidifying additives: the role of the buffer system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, K. E., Petersen, J., Hansen, J. F. & Sommer, S. G. (1992). Kvælstofvirkning af ubehandlet og afgasset gylle efter overfladeudbringning og nedfaeldning (Nitrogen effect of raw and fermented slurry after surface spreading and direct injection). Tidsskrift for Planteavl 96, 223–243 (in Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
Olesen, J. E. (1988). Agrometeorological annual report 1987. Tidsskrift for Planteavls specialserie Beretning nr. S1924. Copenhagen, Denmark (in Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Phillips, V. R., Clarkson, C. R. & Klarenbeek, J. V. (1989). Loss of nitrogen through ammonia volatilisation during and following the application of pig or cattle slurry to grassland. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47, 1–12.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Misselbrook, T. H., Clarkson, C. R. & Rees, Y. J. (1990 a). Odour and ammonia emissions following the spreading of anaerobically-digested pig slurry on grassland. Biological Wastes 34, 259–267.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Thompson, R. B., Rees, Y. J. & Skinner, J. H. (1990 b). Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J. (1994). Equipment for application of animal slurry in field experiments. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 59, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, S. O. (1992). Nitrification and denitrification after direct injection of liquid cattle manure. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science 42, 94–99.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. O., Nielsen, K., Haarder, K. & Henriksen, K. (1992). Factors controlling nitrification and denitrification: a laboratory study with gel-stabilized liquid cattle manure. Microbial Ecology 23, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, V. R., Pain, B. F. & Klarenbeek, J. V. (1991). Factors affecting the odour and ammonia emissions during and after land spreading of animal slurries. In Ammonia and Odour Emissions from Livestock Production (Eds Nielsen, V. C., Voorburg, J. H. & L'Hermité, P.), pp. 98–106. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Rees, Y. J., Pain, B. F., Phillips, V. R. & Misselbrook, T. H. (1993). The influence of surface and sub-surface application methods for pig slurry on herbage yields and nitrogen recovery. Grass and Forage Science 48, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryden, J. C., Skinner, J. N. & Nixon, D. J. (1987). Soil core incubation system for field measurement of denitrification using acetylene-inhibition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19, 753–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1988). SAS/STAT™ User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sibbesen, E. (1990). Kvælstof, fosfor og kalium i foder, animalsk produktion og husdyrgødning i dansk landbrug i 1980-erne. Tidsskrift for Planteavls Specialserie Beretning nr. S2054 (in Danish).Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Ersbøll, A. K. (1994). Soil tillage effects on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied or injected animal slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 23, 493–498.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Husted, S. (1995). The chemical buffer system in raw and digested animal slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 124, 45–53.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Olesen, J. E. (1991). Effects of dry matter content and temperature on ammonia loss from surface-applied cattle slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 20, 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Petersen, J. (1993). Ammonia volatilization from pig slurry and concentrated anaerobic fermented slurry. Tidsskrift for Planteavls Specialserie Beretning nr. S2252 (in Danish with English summary).Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Olesen, J. E. & Christensen, B. T. (1991). Effects of temperature, wind speed and air humidity on ammonia volatilization from surface applied cattle slurry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Kjellerup, V. & Kristjansen, O. (1992). Determination of total ammonium nitrogen in pig and cattle slurry: sample preparation and analysis. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science 42, 146–151.Google Scholar
Stuffins, C. B. (1967). The determination of phosphate and calcium in feeding stuffs. Analyst 92, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. B. & Pain, B. F. (1989). Denitrification from cattle slurry applied to grassland. In Nitrogen in Organic Wastes Applied to Soils (Eds Hansen, J. Aa. & Henriksen, K.), pp. 247–260. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Ryden, J. C. & Lockyer, D. R. (1987). Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland. Journal of Soil Science 38, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Pain, B. F. & Lockyer, D. R. (1990). Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland. Plant and Soil 125, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trehan, S. P. & Wild, A. (1993). Effects of an organic manure on the transformations of ammonium nitrogenin planted and unplated soil. Plant and Soil 151, 287–359.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. F. & Price, B. A. (1980). Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater. Marine Chemistry 8, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar