Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:09:07.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of varying plant population density on the seed yield of Navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)in south-east Enland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. H. Scarisbrick
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, U.K.
J. M. Wilkes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, U.K.
R. Kempson
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, U.K.

Summary

Navy beans were precision drilled in 1973–5 at a range of plant population densities. Within each growing season the density treatments did not influence seed yield, but mean yields differed significantly between years. The results suggest that cultivars similar to Purley King can only be regarded as a reliable break crop in a season such as 1973 which was slightly warmer and drier in mid-summer than average. Although the rate of drying increased with increasing plant density in two of the growing seasons, no practical advantages are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cark, M. K. V. (1975). Climatic and soil requirements. In Maize Growers’ Handbook(ed. Milbourn, G. M.).Google Scholar
Frotjssios, G. (1970). Genetic diversity and agricultural potential in Phaseolus vulgarisL. Experimental Agriculture 6, 129–41.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. L. & Blackman, G. E. (1956). An analysis of the influence of plant density on the growth of Viciafaba.1. The influence of density on the pattern of development. Journal of Experimental Botany 7, 147–65.Google Scholar
Leakey, C. L. A. (1972). The effect of plant population in two determinate cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 259–67.Google Scholar
Lucas, E. O. (1975). Agronomic and physiological studies on two varieties of Phaseolus vulgaris. Ph.D. thesis, University of London (Wye College).Google Scholar
Meadley, J. T. & Milbotjbn, G. M. (1970). The growth of vining peas. II. The effect of density of planting. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. M. (1972). Some aspects of the growth and development of Vicia faba. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
PICKETT, L. K. (1973). Mechanical damage and processing loss during Navy bean harvesting. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 16, 1047–50.Google Scholar
Soabisbbick, D. H., Cabb, M. K. V. & Wllkes, J. M. (1976). The effect of sowing date and season on the development and yield of Navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)in S.E. England. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 6576.Google Scholar