Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T23:42:51.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of age, abomasal cannulation and rumen catheterization on intake and site of digestion by early-weaned lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. J. Cruickshank
Affiliation:
Animal & Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand
D. P. Poppi
Affiliation:
Animal & Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand
A. R. Sykes
Affiliation:
Animal & Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand
A. S. Familton
Affiliation:
Animal & Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln College, Canterbury, New Zealand

Summary

The voluntary food intake, in vivo digestibility and site of nutrient digestion was measured in 12 Polled Dorset ram lambs, from 6 to 24 weeks of age, offered clover hay. Lambs were weaned at 6 weeks of age. Six were fitted with a permanent T-shaped cannula in the abomasum and a temporary rumen catheter during the periods of digesta flow measurement.

Surgical modification of lambs did not influence intake (g/kg live weight (W) per day), in vivo digestibility or marker retention time in the rumen. However, intact lambs grew significantly faster than cannulated lambs (139 v. 109g/day, P < 0·05) apparently because of an overall higher cumulative intake over the whole experimental period rather than any change in efficiency of use of nutrients or maintenance requirement.

Relative to live weight, intake increased rapidly until c. 10 weeks of age and remained relatively constant at c. 37 g DM/kg W per day for the remainder of the experiment. Age had no effect on in vivo digestibility of organic matter (OM) or neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (average 0·69).

The proportion of digestible organic matter apparently digested in the rumen (DOMADR) decreased from 0·63 to 0·47 between 8 and 24 weeks of age whilst intake between these measurement periods increased. Nonammonia N (NAN) flow past the abomasum was similar at all ages in relation to digestible organic matter intake (55·1 g NAN/kg DOMI) but was higher at 16 and 24 weeks of age than at 8 and 12 weeks of age, respectively, in relation to organic matter apparently digested in the rumen (OMADR) (116 and 85 g NAN/kg OMADR, respectively, P < 0·05).

Fractional outflow rate of digesta markers from the rumen, when estimated from abomasal digesta, was significantly higher than when estimated from faeces (103Ru-p 0·121 v. 0·09; 51Cr-EDTA 0·169 v. 0·111/h; P > 0·05).

It was concluded that cannulation did not affect intake and digestion characteristics in these young lambs. The changes in the site of nutrient digestion as the animals aged may have been due to agerelated changes in digestive function but appeared to be associated with the increase in intake that occurred between measurement periods of the cannulated lambs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allden, W. G. (1968). Undernutrition in the Merino sheep and its sequelae. 1. The growth and development of lambs following prolonged periods of nutritional stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 621638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Ulyatt, M. J., Cammell, S. B. & Spooner, M. C. (1985). The digestion of fresh perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Melle) and white clover (Trifolium repens L. cv. Blanca) by growing cattle fed indoors. British Journal of Nutrition 54 763775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruickshank, G. J., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1984). Influence of age of early weaned lambs on intake, digestibility and retention time of clover hay. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 44, 113115.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, G. J., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (in press). Theoretical considerations in the estimation of rumen fractional outflow rate from various sampling sites in the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition.Google Scholar
Egan, J. K. & Doyle, P. T. (1982). The effect of stage of maturity in sheep upon intake and digestion of roughage diets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 193210.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. (Eds. McDonald, I. W. & Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 277291. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1980). The use of markers to measure digesta flow from the stomach of sheep fed once daily. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 313318.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. S., Robinson, J. J. & Fraser, C. (1985). The effect of physiological state on digestion in the ewe and its influence on the quantity of protein reaching the abomasum. Livestock Production Science 12, 5968.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1980). Variation in energy and nitrogen utilization by sheep between weaning and maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 335345.Google Scholar
Jagusch, K. T., Gumbrell, R. C. & Dellow, D. W. (1976). Red gut in lamb grazing trials at Lincoln. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 190197.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. P. & Rattray, P. V. (1970). The intake and utilization of milk and grass by lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 30, 94105.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1977). The effects of various forms of gastrointestinal cannulation on digestive measurements in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 38, 6571.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C, Smith, J. S. & White, F. (1982). Effects of gastrointestinal cannulation and jugular vein catheterization on the metabolism of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 637644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margan, D. E., Faichney, G. J., Graham, N. McC. & Donnelly, J. B. (1982). Digestion of a ground and pelleted diet in the stomach and intestines of young sheepfrom two breeds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 617627.Google Scholar
Mira, J. J. F. & MacRae, J. C. (1982). Comparison of rumen and faecal sampling procedures for calculating the retention time of digesta markers in the rumen of steers. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 77A.Google Scholar
Mudgal, V. D., Dixon, R. M., Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1982). Effect of two intake levels on retention time of liquid, particle and microbial markers in the rumen of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 54, 10511055.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J. & Egan, A. R. (1979). Quantitative digestion of fresh herbage by sheep. V. The digestion of four herbages and prediction of sites of digestion. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 605616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 5055.Google Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. & Coombe, J. B. (1960). The post-natal growth of the visceral organs of the lamb. 1. The growth of the visceral organs of the grazing lamb from birth to sixteen weeks of age. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 54, 140143.Google Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. & Coombe, J. B. (1961). The development of rumen function in the lamb. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 661680.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Margan, D. E., (1979). Herbage digestion in the stomach and intestine of weaner lambs at different stages of their maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 543549.Google Scholar