Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:09:13.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wool yield and characteristics of Dorset, Leicester and Sunffolk breeds and their ‘DLS’ cross

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. H. Fahmy  and
J. A. Vasely
M. H. Fahmy
Affiliation:
Canada Agriculture, Research Stations Lannoxiville, Que
J. A. Vasely
Affiliation:
Lethbridge, Alta, Cananda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Greasy fleece weight (12 months growth) and wool samples from hip and shoulder regions were taken on 15 Dorset, 20 Leicester, 20 Suffolk and 17 DLS ewes (a cross of ½ Dorset, ¼ Leicester, ¼ Suffolk obtained by mating DL rams to DS ewes and DS rams to DL ewes). The purpose of the study was to compare wool production and characteristics of the first generation of DLS with that of the three breeds of origin. Wool production of DLS was 3·58 kg, 8·8 and 14% higher than that of Suffolk and Dorset, but 11% lower than that of Leicester (P< 0·01). The percentage of clean wool was highest in Leicester (78·3%), followed by DLS, Dorset and Suffolk (76·1, 74·3 and 70·5%, respectively). The average fibre diameter of the DLS and Leicester was 38 /m, 4 /m thicker than that for Suffolk and Dorset (P < 0·01). Average fibre length was 15 cm in DLS and Dorset, 6 cm shorter than in Leicester, and 3 cm longer than in Suffolk (P < 0·01). The variability in fibre diameter and length was highest in Leicester, followed closely by DLS.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 651 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berge, S. (1959). Fibre density and fineness in the Merino and in other breeds. Tidsskrift fordet norske Landbruk 66, 346–60.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B., Turner, H. N. & Hardy, M. H. (1958). The influence of various factors on some methods of estimating fibre and follicle population density in the skin of Merino sheep. I. Methods of delineating area of natural skin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghanem, Y. S. (1965). Wool studies of crossbred Merino and Barki sheep living under desert conditions. Bulletin de VInstitut du Disert d'Egypte 15, 33–53.Google Scholar
Hunt, H. R., Ghanem, Y. S., Lawson, C. A. & Brown, G. A. (1952). Wool characteristics, growth, and skin folds in a cross between Rambouillet and Black-top Delaine sheep. Quarterly Bulletin, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station 35, 52–67.Google Scholar
Seouby, A. M., Ghanem, Y. S. & Ghoneim, K. E. (1969). Effect of crossing Merino with Barki sheep on some wool characteristics. II. Grease fleece weight, fibre diameter, crimps, density and fibre type ratio. Journal of Animal Production of V. A. R. 9, 299–301.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M., Wilson, R. L. & Hottbihan, M. E. (1971). Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. IV. Effects of crossbreeding on wool production. Journal of Animal Science 32, 1099–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar