Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:57:26.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Placement of fertilizers for potatoes planted by machines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. W. Cooke
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
M. V. Jackson
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts

Extract

A two-row hand-dropping potato planter was modified by adding fertilizer equipment. The machine was used in thirty-three experiments in 1951 and 1952 to plant potatoes from flat land and compare broadcast dressings of granulated compound fertilizer with dressings placed near to the seed.

Fertilizer placed either in one band at the side and below the level of the seed, or in contact with the seed, gave consistently higher yields than broadcast dressings. Broadcast fertilizer gave yields similar to those given by only one-half to two-thirds as much placed fertilizer. On the average of all the experiments, placing fertilizer gave about 1 ton/acre more potatoes than broadcasting. The advantages of placement were greatest when low rates of dressing were used.

Broadcast fertilizer was cultivated deeply into the seed-beds in nineteen experiments in 1952 and gave slightly lower average yields than late dressings broadcast on the seed-beds.

Fertilizer placed in bands on the soil surface immediately in front of the seed-shoes gave yields similar to those given by dressings broadcast over the seed-beds in fourteen experiments in 1951. In average planting conditions fertilizer broadcast on the seed-beds or placed in front of the seed-shoes was thrown to the middle of the ridges and concentrated above the seed.

Fertilizer placed in contact with the seed gave higher average yields than dressings in a sideband at both rates of manuring in the 1951 experiments. In 1952 contact placement was slightly superior to sideband placement at low rates of fertilizer and slightly inferior at high rates. In most experiments in each year emergence was delayed by 10–14 days when the heavy dressing was placed in contact with the seed. Early growth was poor but at most centres the crops recovered later in the season and gave good yields. There is most risk of damage from contact placement on light soils, on badly prepared seed-beds and in dry years. Dressings of 10 to 12 cwt./acre of ordinary-strength compound fertilizers are likely to be quite safe when applied in contact with the seed. If heavier dressings are to be used, part should be applied in contact with the seed and part broadcast, such split applications were satisfactory in experiments in 1951.

Farmers planting even moderate acreages of potatoes by machines will benefit by using a suitable fertilizer attachment. Equipment is needed to place fertilizer at the side of the seed so that heavy dressings can be used to secure maximum yields without risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, D. A. & Dyke, G. V. (1950). N.A.A.S. Quart. Rev. no. 10, 4757.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. & Dyke, G. V. (1952). Private communication.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 96103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1950). J. Minist. Agric. 56, 571–3.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 160–74.Google Scholar
Cumings, G. A. & Houghland, G. V. C. (1939). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 669.Google Scholar
Fairbank, J. P. & Minges, P. A. (1942). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 41, 310–14.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture (1950). J. Minist. Agric. 57, 245.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Engineering (1950). Report on test of The Scarcliffe 2-Row Potato Planter. Report no. R.T. 26/50018.Google Scholar