Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:43:44.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of methods for determining the concentration of extracellular peptides in rumen fluid of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Wallace
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK
N. McKain
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK

Summary

Samples of rumen fluid were removed from pairs of sheep on four grass-hay-based diets 7 h after feeding. Micro-organisms were sedimented by centrifugation and the cell-free supernatant was treated with perchloric acid (PCA) to precipitate protein. The remaining fluid was analysed for peptides by several methods to determine how much peptide escaped degradation. Ammonia interfered with analysis by amino group reagents, especially ninhydrin. In this respect, o-phthalaldehyde and trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid were more specific and more useful than ninhydrin. Use of all these reagents showed that significant quantities of amino groups (equivalent to up to 153 mg amino acid N/1 of rumen fluid) were released by hydrolysis of the PCA extract with 6 M-HCI for 24 h. However, fluorescamine analysis indicated that the peptide content of the unhydrolysed PCA extract was < 3 mg N/1. The true amino acid content of different extracts was resolved by chromatographic amino acid analysis: the sum of individual amino acid concentrations in acid-hydrolysed PCA extracts of extracellular rumen fluid ranged from 7·8 to 14·5 mg N/1. Thus most of the free amino N released by hydrolysis of the PCA extract was not from amino acids, and most of the amino acids that were released were originally present in a form that did not react with fluorescamine. Although none of the methods gave a reliable estimate of peptide concentrations, amino acid analysis provided an upper limit. It was therefore concluded that peptide concentrations in extracellular rumen fluid are much lower than indicated by previous ninhydrin estimations, and that little dietary peptide escapes degradation for a prolonged period in the rumen.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Broderick, G. A. & Wallace, R. J. (1988). Effects of dietary nitrogen source on concentrations of ammonia, free amino acids and fluorescamine-reactive peptides in the sheep rumen. Journal of Animal Science 66, 22332238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, G. A., Wallace, R. J. & McKain, N. (1988). Uptake of small neutral peptides by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 42, 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Russell, J. B. & Sniffen, C. J. (1987a). A procedure for measuring peptides in rumen fluid and evidence that peptide uptake can be a rate-limiting step in ruminal protein degradation. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 12111219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, G., Sniffen, C. J. & Russell, J. B. (1987b). Concentration and estimated flow of peptides from the rumen of dairy cattle: effects of protein quantity, protein solubility, and feeding frequency. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 983992.Google Scholar
Herbert, D., Phipps, P. J. & Strange, R. E. (1971). Chemical analysis of microbial cells. In Methods in Microbiology Vol. 5 B (Eds Norris, J. R. & Ribbons, D. W.), pp. 209344. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mangan, J. L. (1972). Quantitative studies on nitrogen metabolism in thebovine rumen. The rate of proteolysis of casein and ovalbumin and the release and metabolism offree amino acids. British Journal of Nutrition 27, 261283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. & Stein, W. H. (1954). A modified ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds. Journal of Biological Chemistry 211, 907913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nugent, J. H. A. & Mangan, J. L. (1981). Characteristics of the rumen proteolysis of fraction I (18S) leaf protein from lucerne (Medicago sativa L). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 3958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, D. W. & Peters, T. (1969). Automated determination of free amino groups in serum and plasma using 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulphonate. Clinical Chemistry 9, 891901.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1971). Fluorescence reaction for amino acids. Analytical Chemistry 43, 880882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, H. M., Nuttall, M. E. & Robinson, F. C. (1988). Acetylation of spermidine and methylglyoxal bis (guanylhydrazone) by baby-hamster kidney cells (BHK-21/C13). Biochemical Journal 253, 223227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, R. J. (1986). Catabolism of amino acids by Megasphaera elsdenii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51, 11411143.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. & McKain, N. (1989). Some observations on the susceptibility of peptides to degradation by rumen microorganisms. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2, 333335.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, M. W. (1967). Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39, 971974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. E. & Hungate, R. E. (1967). Amino acid concentrations in rumen fluid. Applied Microbiology 15, 148151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed