Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:30:04.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Tariff Measures And Industrial Nation Imports Of Agricultural Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Don P. Clark
Don P. Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trade coverage ratios were calculated to assess the 1989 incidence of non-tariff measures (NTMs) on imports of agricultural products by major industrial nations. Overall, 36 percent of all food items were found to be covered by one or more NTM in the European Community. Corresponding figures for Japan and the United States were 59 and 17 percent, respectively. Imports of agricultural products confront a wide variety of NTMs in markets of industrial nations. Results of the analysis were used to shed light on prospects for reaching agreements on agricultural reform issues in the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations.

Keywords

non-tariff measuresprotectionismagricultural trade policy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , July 1992 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, Robert E. Non-Tariff Distortions of International Trade. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1970.Google Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L. “The Why, How, and Consequences of Agricultural Policies: The United States.” Agritural Protectionism in the Industrialized World. Sanderson, Fred H., ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Hayami, Yujiro. “The Why, How, and Consequences of Agricultural Policies; Japan.” Agricultural Protectionism in the Industrialized World Sanderson, Fred H., ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Herander, Mark G., and Schwartz, J. Brad. “An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties.” So. Econ. J., 51(1984): 59–79.Google Scholar
Koester, Ulrich, and Tangermann, Stefan. “The Why, How, and Consequences of Agricultural Policies: The European Community,” Agricultural Protectionism in the Industrialized World. Sanderson, Fred H., ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.Google Scholar
Laird, Sam, and Yeats, Alexander. “Trends in Nontariff Barriers of Developed Countries, 1966-1986.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv., 126(1990a): 299–325.Google Scholar
Laird, Sam, and Yeats, Alexander. Quantitative Methods for Trade Barrier Analysis. New York: New York University Press, 1990b.Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick A. “The EC Antidumping Regulations: A First Economic Appraisal, 1980-85.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv., 125(1989): 563–587.Google Scholar
Nogues, Julio, Olechowski, Andrzej, and Winters, L. Alan. “The Extent of Nontariff Barriers to Industrial Countries Import.” World Bank Econ. Rev., 1(1986): 181–199.Google Scholar
Runge, C. Ford, and Stanton, Gretchen Heimpel. “The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round Negotiations: A View from Geneva.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988) :1146–1152.Google Scholar
Sampson, Gary P. “Non-Tariff Barriers Facing Developing Country Exports.” Developing Countries and the Global Trading System. Vol. 1, Whally, John, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Sampson, Gary P. and Snape, Richard H.. “Effects of the EEC's Variable Import Levies.” J Pol Econ., 88(1980): 1026–1040.Google Scholar
Sampson, Gary P., and Yeats, Alexander J.. “An Evaluation of the Common Agricultural Policy as a Barrier Facing Agricultural Exports to the European Economic Community.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977): 99–106.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Protectionism and Structural Adjustment: Problems of Protectionism and Structural Adjustment, Addendum. TD/B/1240/Add.1, United Nations, Geneva, 1989.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. The UNCTAD Data Base on Trade Control Measures. UNCTAD/DDM/Misc. 18, United Nations, Geneva, 1990.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission. The Economic Effects of Significant U.S. Import Restraints, Phase IT. Agricultural Products and Natural Resources. USITC Publication 2314, Washington, DC, 1990.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission. International Economic Review. Washington, D.C., July 1991.Google Scholar
Walter, Ingo. “Non-Tariff Protection Among Industrial Countries: Some Preliminary Evidence.” Economic Internazionale., 25(1972): 335–354.Google Scholar