Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:49:53.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agribusiness In A Global Economy: Challenges For An Evolving Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Michael L. Cook*
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Unit of the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri-Columbia

Extract

In a revised definition of the Davis-Goldberg concept of agribusiness, Sonka and Hudson suggest that the food and agribusiness sector might be thought of as a sequence of interrelated subsectors made up of: (1) genetics and seedstock firms, (2) input suppliers, (3) agricultural producers, (4) merchandisers or first handlers, (5) processors, (6) retailers, and (7) consumers. In applying this ubiquitous definition to global data, Goldberg (1991a) estimates that the food and agribusiness system is the largest economic sector in the world economy representing 50 percent of the global labor force, 50 percent of global assets, and 50 percent of global consumer expenditures.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, John. “Undergraduate Education in Departments of Agricultural Economics in the South: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.So. J. of Agr. Econ., Volume 22.1 (1990): 110.Google Scholar
Batie, Sandra. “Agriculture as the Problem: New Agendas and New Opportunities.So. J. Agr. Econ. 20(1) 1988:111.Google Scholar
Beattie, Bruce R.Some Almost-Ideal Remedies for Healing Land Grant Universities.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 73.5, (1991): 13071321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnen, James T.On the Role of Data and Measurement in Agricultural Economics Research.J. Agr. Econ. Res., 71.4 (1989): 28.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E.Agricultural Economics in an Evolutionary Perspective.Am. J. of Agr. Econ., 63.5 (1981):788795.Google Scholar
Briemyer, Harold. “Agricultural Economics: A Transcendental Allegory.” In Essays in Honor of Karl A. Fox, edited by Kaul, and Segupta, , Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991.Google Scholar
Castle, Emery N. and Hildreth, R.J.. “An Overview: Agricultural Economics at a Crossroads.Agriculture and Rural Areas Approaching the Twenty-First Century, Hildreth, R.J. et al., eds. Iowa State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Crowder, Richard T. and Hoffman, George H.. “Ideal Academic Products for Industry: Research and Graduates.Am. Jo. Agr. Econ., 71(1989): 11911194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.H. and Goldberg, R.. A Concept of Agribusiness, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1957.Google Scholar
F.A.E.I.S. Fall 1991 Enrollment in Agriculture and Natural Resources—A Combined Report for AASCARR and NASULGC, February 1992.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Ray A.The Global Food System — The Role of Cooperatives.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Symposium of Cooperative Managers, Carmel, California, April 1991a.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Ray A.Why the International Agribusiness Management Association?Global Agribusiness for the 90s. Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium of the International Agribusiness Management Association, Boston, Massachusetts, March 1991b.Google Scholar
Hambley, Diane I. and Raymond Marquardt, A.. “Status of U.S. Agribusiness Masters Programs.Agribusiness, An International Journal, 6.2 (1990): 153162.Google Scholar
Hardin, Lowell S.Potential Growth Areas in Agricultural Economics.J. Farm Econ., 45.5 (1963): 941.Google Scholar
Johnston, Warren E.Structural Change and the Recognition of Diversity.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 72.5 (1990): 11091123.Google Scholar
Just, Richard E. and Rausser, Gordon C.. “An Assessment of the Agricultural Economics Profession.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 71.5 (1989): 1177–190.Google Scholar
Manderscheid, Lester V.Undergraduate Educational Opportunities in the Face of Declining Enrollments.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70.5 (1988): 985993.Google Scholar
Marion, Bruce W., and the NC-117 Committee. The Organization and Performance of the U.S. Food System. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1986.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N.Agon and Ag Ec: Styles of Persuasion in Agricultural Economics.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 72.5 (1990): 11241130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paarlberg, Robert. “The Political Economy of American Agricultural Policy: Three Approaches.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 71.5 (1989) :11571164.Google Scholar
Padberg, Daniel I.Agricultural Economics: Finding Our Future.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69.5 (1987): 883889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polopolus, Leo. “Agricultural Economics Beyond the Farm Gate.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 64.5 (1982): 803810.Google Scholar
Reed, Michael R. and Marchant, Mary A.. “The Globalization of the U.S. Food Processing Sector.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Globalization of Agricultural and Food Order, Columbia, Missouri, June 1991.Google Scholar
Schulter, Gerald, C. Lee, , and Edmondson, W.. “Income and Employment Generation in the Food and Fiber System.Agribusiness, An InternationalJournal, 2.2 (1986): 143158.Google Scholar
Smith, Stew. “Farming—Its Declining in the U.S.Choices, First Quarter, 1992, p. 810..Google Scholar
Sonka, Steven T. and Hudson, Michael A.. “Why Agribusiness Anyway?Agribusiness, An International Journal, 5.4 (1989): 305314.Google Scholar
Taylor, H.C.The Development of the American Farm Economic Association.J. Farm Econ., 4.2:(1922): 92100.Google Scholar
Urban, Thomas N.Agricultural Industrialization: It's Inevitable.Choices, Fourth Quarter, 1991, pp. 46.Google Scholar
Webster, Anthony A.Why the International Agribusiness Management Association?Global Agribusiness for the 90s. Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium of the International Agribusiness Management Association, Boston, Massachusetts, March 1991.Google Scholar