Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:09:56.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fall of the Bapedi of the North-Eastern Transvaal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

K. W. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When the remnants of the Bapedi returned to their country after they had been driven from it by the Matabele, Sekwati strengthened the tribe so that attacks by the Boers, Zulus and Swazis were repulsed.

When Sekhukhune succeeded to the chieftainship in 1861, his attempts at expanding Bapedi influence caused the South African Republic to declare war in 1876.

After the annexation of the Transvaal by Great Britain, Sekhukhune resumed his empire building, and in March 1878 the Bapedi went on the warpath. Groups of hastily raised volunteers managed to contain the Bapedi in their strongholds, but after the failure of a British expedition in October 1878, offensive operations were abandoned until the end of the fever season in April–May 1879. Patrols were then once again active, when Sir Garnet Wolseley ordered a halt to all offensives; Sir Garnet himself arrived in the Transvaal in September 1879, and personally directed operations against Sekhukhune. A massive assault was made on the Bapedi stronghold on 28 November 1879; the Bapedi suffered a crushing defeat and the chief himself was captured.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 237 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hunt, D. R., in his ‘An Account of the Bapedi’, Bantu Studies, v, no. 4 (1931), 284,Google Scholar identifies Thulare's death with the annular eclipse of 1824. Recent research seems to indicate that the total eclipse of 14 March 1820 is the more probable date of his death (see Gray, R., ‘Annular eclipse maps’, J. Afr. Hist. ix, no. 1 (1968), 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Hunt, , ‘An Account of the Bapedi’, 285–288;Google Scholarvan Rooyen, T. S., ‘Die Verhoudinge tussen die Boere, Engelse en Naturelle in die Geskiedenis van die Oos-Transvaal tot 1882’, Archives Year Book for S. A. History, I (1951), 96–7 (‘The relations between Boers, English and Natives in the history of the Eastern Transvaal to 1882’).Google Scholar

3 Agar-Hamilton, J. A. I., The Native Policy of the Voortrekkers 1836–1858 (Cape Town, n.d.), 54–62;Google ScholarVan Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 502–3.Google Scholar

4 Hunt, , ‘An Account of the Bapedi’, 289–293; Van Rooyen, ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 97–101, 104.Google Scholar

5 See Wangemann, T., Maleo en Sekoekoeni (ed. Trümpelmann, O. P. J.), Van Riebeck Society, no. 38 (Cape Town, 1957);Google ScholarVan Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, pp. 106, 146–163.Google Scholar

6 Superintendent van Naturellen (hereafter SN), IA, 105/79: report by G. Roth on tribes living in and adjacent to the district of Lydenburg. C 2584, no. 9, encl.: memorandum on native population of the Transvaal by H. C. Shepstone, 25 Nov. 1879. Aylward, A.The Transvaal of To-Day, 2nd ed. (London, 1881), 32–3.Google Scholar

7 McCall Theal, G., History of South Africa from 1873 to 1884: Twelve eventful Years, I, (London, 1919);Google ScholarVan Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 101, 226–8.Google Scholar

8 Van Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 228–33, 244–5.Google Scholar

9 See Otto, J. C., ‘Sekoekoeni en die Handel in Vuurwapens’, Historiese Studies, v (1944), 161–74 (‘Sekoekoeni and the trade in fire-arms’);Google ScholarVan Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 198–214.Google Scholar

10 Van Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 245–64.Google Scholar

11 Goodfellow, C. F., Great Britain and South African Confederation 1870–1881 (Cape Town, 1966), 114.Google Scholar

12 Van Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 278.Google Scholar

13 Ibid. 264–74, 279–80, 288.

14 C 1776, no. III, encl. 2: Merensky to Shepstone, 21 Feb. 1877; encl. I: English translation of Sekhukhune's letter, 16 Feb. 1877.

15 General Letter Book of H.M. Special Commissioner to the Transvaal Government, 1876–8, p. 61: Shepstone to M. Osborne and Capt. M. Clarke, 16 Mar. 1877. C 1776, no. III, encl. 5, 6, 8; Shepstone Coil., vol. 7, pp. 142–5, 4 Apr. 1877.

16 General Letter Book, pp. 73–4: Shepstone, to Clarke, , 12 04. 1877.Google Scholar Staatsekretaris (hereafter SS), 241, R 2744/77: Clarke to (Secy to Govt), 18 July 1877. SS 242, R 2932/77: Clarke, to Govt Secy (sic), 3 08 1877. C 1883, no. 21, encl. I: message to Sekhukhune, encl. 2:Google ScholarClarke, to Shepstone, , 13 06 1877. C 2144, no. 27, encl. I:Google ScholarClarke, to Secy for Native Affairs, II 08 1877.Google Scholar

17 (SN) 5: memo on Sekhukhune, unsigned and n.d. (1878).

18 SS 247, R 3520/77: Aylward, to Shepstone, , 29 09 1877. Natal Witness, 10 and 20 07, 4 09. and 12 10. 1877.Google Scholar

19 SS 241, R 2744/77: Clarke, to (Secy to Govt), 8 07 1877. SN I, no. 41:Google ScholarSirBarlow, M. to Shepstone, H. C., 16 09. 1877 and no. 42 of the same date. SS z8, R 4644/77:Google ScholarBarlow, to Shepstone, H. C., 27 11. 1877. SS 254, R 4357/77:Google ScholarSchultzs, to State Secy (sic), 8 12. 1877.Google Scholar

20 SS 254, R 43577sol;77 and SS 255, R 4465/77: Schultz, , 8 and 22 12. 1877. SS 258, R 4654/77:Google ScholarAylward, , 31 12. 1877.Google Scholar

21 SSc 320, R 4592/78: Nachtigal, A to Roth, G. A., 14 01. 1878. SS 268, R 588/78: Clarke to Secy to Govt, 8 02. 1878 and testimony of two Africans. SS 320, R 4594/78:Google ScholarClarke, to Secy for Native Affairs, 12 02. 1878. C 2100, no. 39, encl. 2:Google ScholarClarke, to Shepstone, H. C., 12 and 15 02. 1878. Transvaal Government Gazette, no. 53, suppl., 15 04. 1878.Google Scholar

22 Government House (hereafter G.H.), 11/3, pp. 242–55. Landdrost Lydenburg (hereafter Land. Lyd.), vol. 23: Roth to Govt Secy (sic), 9 03 1878. SS 269, R 743/78: Roth, to Clarke, 3 03 1878.Google Scholar

23 Van Rooyen, , ‘Die Verhoudinge’, 311–12.Google Scholar

24 Land. Lyd. vol. 4: C. Schultz, to Roth, , 5 09 1878. SS 288, R 2146/78. C 2220, no. 73, encl Natal Witness, 2 07 1878.Google Scholar

25 Land. Lyd., vol. 4: Schultz, to Roth, , 5 08. 1878.Google Scholar Letter Book Administrator to H.C.: Shepstone, T. to Frere, , 6 02. 1879.Google Scholar

26 C 2505, no. 19, encl.: Declaration of Sekhukhune, 10 Dec. 1879.

27 SS 271, R 872/78: Roth, to Shepstone, T., 9 03. 1878. SS 270, R 797/78: Petition of H. Glynu and six others to Lieut. Gov. (sic) of Transvaal (n.d. but replied to in Letter Book 190/78, 22 03. 1878). SS 274, R 1069/78:Google ScholarRoth, to Osborn, , 5 05. 1878. SS 274, R 1017/78:Google ScholarRoth, to Secy to Govt, 19 04. 1878.Google Scholar

28 Shepstone Collection, vol. 7, pp. 38–40: Shepstone, T. to SirHerbert, R. G. W., 11 05 1878.Google Scholar SS 281, R 1660/78: Memo by Clarke, , 15 05 1878. C.O. 291–9, 6386/80: Chief of Staff's Journal, pp. 70–3; C, Minute on relations with Sekhukhune.Google Scholar

29 Coll, Shepstone., vol. 7, pp. 155–7:Google ScholarShepstone, T. to Rowlands, 1 11. 1878, and vol. 14:Google ScholarCheirnsford, to Shepstone, , 26 10. 1878.Google Scholar C 2234, no. 9, encl, 2: Forces in the field, 29 Sep. 1878. C 2220, no. 131, encl.: Chelmsford to Secy of State for War, 21 Oct. 1878; and sub-encl. I: Rowiands, to Chelmsford, , 9 10. 1878.Google Scholar

30 References to Bapedi aggression at this stage are to be found in SS volumes 317–19, 330, 332, 335 and 355.

31 C 2318, no. 20: SirBeach, Michael Hicks to Sir W. O. Lanyon, 28 05 1879.Google Scholar Shepstone Coll. vol. 21: Wolseley, to Col. Bray, , 29 06 1879.Google Scholar

32 C.O. 295–9, 6386/80: Chief of Staff's Journal, p. 3.

33 Chief of Staff/s Journal, pp. 3–5, 73–76. C 2482, no. 558, encl.: Statements of No Patola and Tamalcana.

34 Chief of Staff/s Journal, pp. 31–37. Brackenbury, H., ‘The Transvaal Twenty Years Ago’, Blackwood's Magazine, CLXVI (1899), 740–3. C 2482, no. 183, encls. 1 and 2:Google ScholarWolseley, to Frere, (Telegraphic), 25 and 26 11. 1879. Transvaal Argus and Commercial Gazette, 3 12. 1879. Natal Witness, 16 12. 1879.Google Scholar

35 Chief of Staff's Journal, p. 30, and Brackenbury, p. 742. C 2505, no. 59, encl.: Declaration of Sekhukhune, 10 Dec. 1879. Natal Witness, 16 12. 1879.Google Scholar

36 Lehmann, J. H., All Sir Garnet: A Life of Field-Marshal Lord Wolseley (London, 1964), 271.Google Scholar

37 Chief of Staff's Journal, pp. 38–39, and Brackenbury, pp. 743–5; Lehmann, , All Sir Garnet, 271–4;Google Scholar Maj.-Gen. Sir Maurice, F. and SirArthur, George, The Life of Lord Wolseley, (London, 1924), 124; Natal Witness, 16 1879; Cape Argus, 16 12. 1879; Natal Mercury, 13 12. 1879; Transvaal Argus, 24 12. 1879.Google Scholar

38 Chief of Staff's Journal, pp. 38, 40–42, 45, and Brackenbury, pp. 744–8; Natal Witness, 23 12. 1879.Google ScholarMoodie, D. C. F., The History of the Battles and Adventures of the British, the Boers and the Zulus, and c in Southern Africa, II (Cape Town, 1888).Google Scholar

39 Chief of Staff's Journal, pp. 45–6. C 2505, no. 18: Wolseley, to Beach, Hicks, 12 12. 1879.Google Scholar C 2584, no. 21, encl. I: Memo by Clarke, , 2 01. 1880.Google Scholar

40 Shepstone Coll., vol. 20: Shepstone, H. C. to Shepstone, T., 8 07, 1 11. and 13 12 1880;Google Scholar vol. 29: Shepstone, H. C. to SirLanyon, W. O., 31 01. 1881. C 2584, no. 48, encl.: Return of fire-arms, 14 01. 1880.Google Scholar

41 SN 2: Schultz, to Secy for Native Affairs, 30 12. 1879. C 2584, no. 21, encl. 1: Memo by Clarke, 2 01. 1880.Google Scholar C 2505, no 39, encl. I: Clarke, to Schultz, , 19 12. 1879, and instructions to magistrate Lulu Mountains, 16 12. 1879.Google Scholar

42 See van Coller, H. P., ‘Mampoer in die Stryd om die Bapedi-Troon (Die Mapochoorlog 1882–1883)’, in Historiese Studies, III, nos. 3–4 (1942), 79–152 (‘Mampoer and his struggle for the throne of the Bapedi: the Mapoch War 1882–1883’).Google Scholar