Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:39:15.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indonesia's Democratic Performance: A Popular Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

SAIFUL MUJANI
Affiliation:
Universitas Islam Negeri, Jakarta, [email protected]
R. WILLIAM LIDDLE
Affiliation:
Ohio State [email protected]

Abstract

How democratic is contemporary Indonesia? While analysts differ, Indonesian citizens, when asked in systematic public opinion surveys conducted regularly by the authors since 1999, consistently express strong support for democratic principles and also believe that their country's democratic performance is high. Support for democratic performance is highly correlated with support for government performance, as measured by perceptions of the condition of the national economy and political system. At the same time, higher levels of education and income, in Indonesia as in other countries, have created a considerable number of critical citizens, that is, citizens who value democracy but are critical of its performance. On our evidence for Indonesia, it is members of this group who are the most motivated and best prepared to demand a higher level of democratic performance from their elected officials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus (eds.) (2010) Problems of Democratization in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, Singapore: ISEAS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, Mattes, Robert, and Gyamah-Boadi, E. (2004) Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Dutt, Nitish, and Kornberg, Allan (1993), ‘The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Polity and Society In Western European Democracies’, Journal of Politics, 55: 9981021.Google Scholar
Freedom House, www.freedomhouse.org (accessed 28 December 2014).Google Scholar
Hadiz,Vedi, R. (2010), Localizing Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. William (2002), ‘Indonesia's Democratic Transition: Playing by the Rules’, in Reynolds, Andrew (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7399.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. William and Mujani, Saiful (2007), ‘Leadership, Party, and Religion: Explaining Voting Behavior in Indonesia’, Comparative Political Studies, 40 (7): 832–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959), ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Political Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53: 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard (1997), ‘Trust, Distrust, and Skepticism: Popular Evaluation of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies’, Journal of Politics, 2: 418–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samadhi, Willy Purna and Warouw, Nicolaas (eds.) (2009), Building Democracy on the Sand: Advances and Setbacks in Indonesia, Yogyakarta and Jakarta: Demos and PCD Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adamet al. (2000), Democracy and Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011), Oligarchy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar