Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:42:31.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politicization of the refugee crisis?: a content analysis of parliamentary debates in Italy, the UK, and the EU

Part of: IPSR-RISP Migration collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

Stella Gianfreda
Stella Gianfreda*
Affiliation:
PhD Candidate, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Institute of Law, Politics and Development (DIRPOLIS), Pisa, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper draws on the literature on party competition and issue ownership to assess whether political membership on the right-left dimension explains party stances on migration. While some scholars argue that on this issue a clear distinction between left and right exists, some more recent quantitative and fine-grained analyses show a more nuanced picture. According to them, a clear difference in narratives exists only when the salience of the issue is high, under pressure of the electoral success of a far-right party or about specific policy issues. This paper further investigates this aspect in the context of the 2015 refugee crisis. It looks at the positions held by the main centre-left, centre-right, Radical Right, and Populist Parties in the Italian, British, and European Parliaments. The content analysis shows that centre-left parties frame the refugee crisis mainly as a humanitarian emergency and held pro-European Union (EU) positions, while centre-right parties differ substantially between Italy and the United Kingdom. Both radical right and Populist Parties exploit the political-opportunity offered by the refugee crisis to foster their anti-establishment claims. Moreover, Radical Right Populist Parties stress the need to secure external borders and restore national sovereignty, against further integration. At the EU level, left- and right-wing groups (Socialist and Democrats Party, European Conservatives and Reformists Party, and European People’s Party) are cohesive, while the populist group (European Freedom and Direct Democracy Party) is not. This paper adds on the academic debate on the refugee crisis, showing how the immigration issue can impact on domestic and European party politics, challenging party identities and alliances.

Keywords

migrationEuropean Unionparty politicspopulismcontent analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 85 - 108
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkerman, T. (2012), ‘Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: a fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades’, Party Politics 21(1): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, S. and Da Fonseca, C.S. (2011), ‘Immigration, left and right’, Party Politics 18(6): 865–884.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2005), ‘AntConc: design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom’. Paper presented at the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, July 11–13, Limerick.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. and Baker, P. (2015), ‘ProtAnt. A tool for analysing the prototypicality of texts’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(3): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, T. (2003), ‘Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems’, West European Politics 26(3): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, T., Green-Pedersen, C., Krouwel, A., Richard, K. and Sitter, L.N. (2010), ‘If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in western Europe’, Political Studies 58(3): 410–426.Google Scholar
Bardi, L. (2014), ‘Political parties, responsiveness, and responsibility in multi-level democracy: the challenge of horizontal Euroscepticism’, European Political Science 13(4): 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1994), Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bigo, D. (2002), ‘Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(1): 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomqvist, P. and Green-Pedersen, C. (2004), ‘Defeat at home? Issue-ownership and social democratic support in Scandinavia’, Government and Opposition 39(4): 587–613.Google Scholar
Bolin, N., Lidén, G. and Nyhlén, J. (2014), ‘Do anti-immigration parties matter? The case of the Sweden Democrats and local refugees policy’, Scandinavian Political Studies 37(3): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, C., Geddes, A. and Scholten, P. (2011), ‘The role of narratives in migration policy-making: a research framework’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13(1): 12–25.Google Scholar
Bressanelli, E. (2014), ‘Necessary deepening? How political groups in the European parliament adapt to enlargement’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(5): 776–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983), Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Buonfino, A. (2004), ‘Between unity and plurality: the politicization and securitization of the discourse of immigration in Europe’, New Political Science 26(1): 23–49.Google Scholar
Calossi, E. (2016), Anti-Austerity Left Parties in the European Union. Competition and Integration, Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (2004), ‘Populism for Political Theorists?’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J. (2013), Impact of Extreme Right Parties on Immigration Policy: Comparing Britain, France, and Italy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castellazzi, S. (2010), ‘Le implicazioni legislative del fenomeno sociale migratorio. L’evoluzione normativa italiana’’, in V. Gasparini Casari (ed.), Il diritto dell’immigrazione. Profili di Diritto Italiano, Comunitario e Internazionale, Modena: Mucchi Editore, pp. 93–140.Google Scholar
Castelli Gattinara, P. (2016), The Politics of Migration in Italy. Perspectives on Local Debates and Party Competition, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. and Dennis, J. (2016), ‘Country Report: United Kingdom’. ECRE. Retrieved 8 May 2017 from http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_uk_2016update.pdf Google Scholar
Cuttitta, P. (2014), ‘“Borderizing” the island setting and narratives of the Lampedusa “Border Play”’, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 13(2): 196–219.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (eds) (2000), Parties Without Partisans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Lange, S. (2012), ‘New alliances: why mainstream parties govern with radical right-wing populist parties’, Political Studies 60(4): 899–918.Google Scholar
Dennison, J. and Goodwin, M. (2015), ‘Immigration, issue ownership and the rise of UKIP’, Parliamentary Affairs 68(1): 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2012), ‘Can politicization of European integration be reversed?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(Suppl 1): 137–153.Google Scholar
Diamanti, I. (2007), ‘The Italian centre-right and centre-left: between parties and “the party”’, West European Politics 30(4): 733–762.Google Scholar
Devi, B. Prasad (2008), ‘Content analysis: A method of Social Science Research’, in D.K. Lal Das (ed.), Research Methods for Social Work, New Delhi: Rawat Publications, pp. 174–193.Google Scholar
Entman, R.M. (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Asylum Support Office (2016), ‘Annual report on the situation of asylum in the European Union’. EASO. Retrieved 8 May 2017 from https://www.easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/EN_%20Annual%20Report%202015_1.pdf Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2010), Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fassin, D. (2011), ‘Policing borders, producing boundaries. The governmentality of immigration in dark times’, Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 213–226.Google Scholar
Finotelli, C. and Sciortino, G. (2008), ‘New trends in Italian immigration policies: to change everything in order to keep everything the same’. ARI 161/2008, Real Instituto Elanco, 12 September.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2003), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frontex (2016), ‘Annual Risk Analysis for 2016’. Frontex, Warsaw. Retrieved 8 May 2017 from http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/Annual_Risk_Analysis_2016.pdf Google Scholar
Geddes, A. and Scholten, P. (2016), The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe, London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2007), ‘The growing importance of issue competition: the changing nature of party competition in western Europe’, Political Studies 55(3): 607–628.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. and Krogstrup, J. (2008), ‘Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden’, European Journal of Political Research 47(5): 610–634.Google Scholar
Grande, E. and Schwarzbözl, T. (2017), ‘Politicizing Europe in the UK. Dynamics of inter-party competition and intra-party conflict’. Paper presented at the Global Governance Conference, May 18–19, Florence.Google Scholar
Hammar, T. (1985), European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, A., Power, M.J., Devereux, E., Dillane, A. and Carr, J. (eds) (2016), Public and Political Discourses of Migration. International Perspectives, London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hix, S. and Noury, A. (2009), ‘After enlargement: voting patterns in the sixth European parliament’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(2): 159–174.Google Scholar
Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2007), Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horsti, K. (2012), ‘Humanitarian discourse legitimating migration control: FRONTEX public communication’, in M. Messer, R. Schroeder and R. Wodak (eds), Migration: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vienna: Springer, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J. (1995), ‘Migrants as a security problem: dangers of “securitizing” societal issues’, in R. Miles and D. Thranhardt (eds), Migration and European Security: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion, London: Pinter Publisher, pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J. (2000), ‘The European Union and the securitization of migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): 751–777.Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. (1992), ‘The silent counter-revolution. Hypotheses on the emergence of extreme right parties in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 22(1): 3–34.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Style Among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, G., Lanzone, M.E. and Sozzi, F. (2016), ‘Eurosceptic parties and the EU: MEPs’ attitudes in the roll-call votes on immigration policies. A cross-country analysis (Italy, France and UK)’. Paper presented at 66th PSA Annual International Conference, March 23, Brighton.Google Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R.I. and Budge, I. (1994), Parties, Policies and Democracy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Korkut, U., Bucken-Knapp, G., McGarry, A., Hinnfors, J. and Drake, H. (eds) (2013), The Discourses and Politics of Migration in Europe, New York, US: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006), ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–957.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2013), Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lachat, R. (2014), ‘Issue ownership and the vote: the effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting’, Swiss Political Science Review 20(4): 727–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahav, G. (2004), Immigration and Politics in the New Europe: Reinventing Borders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lanzone, M.E. (2014), ‘The “post modern” populism in Italy: the case of the Five Stars Movement’, in D. Woods and B. Wejnert (eds), The Many Faces of Populism: Current Perspectives, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 53–78.Google Scholar
Layton-Henry, Z. (1982), ‘Introduction: conservatism and conservative politics’, in Z. Layton-Henry (ed.), Conservatives Politics in Western Europe, New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Layton-Henry, Z. (1994), ‘Britain: the would-be-zero-immigration country’, in A.C. Wayne, P.L. Martin and F.H. James (eds), Controlling Immigration: a Global Perspective, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 273–296.Google Scholar
Leonard, S. (2007), ‘The “securitization” of asylum and migration in the European Union: beyond the Copenhagen school’s framework’. Paper presented at the SGIR Sixth Pan-European International Relations Conference, September 2–15, Turin.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1971), ‘Comparative politics and the comparative method’, American Political Science Review 65(3): 682–693.Google Scholar
Meny, Y. and Surel, Y. (2002), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Money, J. (1999), Fences and Neighbours. The Political Geography of Immigration Control, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mosca, L. (2014), ‘The Five Star Movement: exception or vanguard in Europe?’, The International Spectator 49(1): 36–52.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. (2004), ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39(4): 541–563.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musarò, P. (2016), ‘Mare Nostrum: the visual politics of a military-humanitarian operation in the Mediterranean sea’, Media, Culture & Society 39(1): 11–28.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, T. (1996), ‘Immigration policy Italian-style’, South European Society and Politics 1(2): 229–252.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, T. (2015), ‘A narrowing gyre? The Lega Nord and the shifting balance of Italian immigration policy’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(8): 1339–1346.Google Scholar
Pilbaum, B. (2003), Conservatism in Crisis? Anglo-American Conservative Ideology After the Cold War, Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. (2001), Capire le politiche pubbliche, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Riva, P., Colombo, M. and Montali, L. (2008), ‘Comparing right and left-wing discourse on immigration: a lexical correspondence analysis of Italian parliamentary debates’. Talk given at the 9th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, March 12–14, Lyon.Google Scholar
Schain, M.A. (2006), ‘The extreme-right and immigration policymaking: measuring direct and indirect effect’, West European Politics 29(2): 270–289.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (1995), ‘New populist parties in Western Europe’, Western European Politics 18(1): 34–51.Google Scholar
Tedesco, F. (2016), Modelli europei di accogliena dei rifugiati e richiedenti asilo, Roma: Aracne Editore.Google Scholar
UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) (2016), ‘Global trends: forced displacement in 2015’. UNHCR, Geneva. Retrieved 8 May 2017 from http://www.unhcr.org/576408cd7.pdf Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W. and van Spanje, J. (2009), ‘Immigration, Europe and the “new” cultural dimension’, European Journal of Political Research 48(3): 309–334.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, A.T. (1993), ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society 4(2): 249–283.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, A.T. (1997), ‘Political discourse and racism. Describing others in the western parliaments’’, in S. Harold Riggins (ed.), The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 31–64.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, A.T. (2000), ‘Ideologies, racism, discourse: debates on immigration and ethnic issues’, in J. Ter Wal and M. Verkuyten (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Racism, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Von Beyme, Klaus. (1988), ‘Right-wing extremism in post-war Europe’, West European politics, 11(2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M., Baumgartner, P., Dimitriadi, A., O’Donnel, R., Kraler, A., Perumadan, J., Hagen Schlotzhauer, J., Ivana, S., Yabasun, D. (2016), ‘The implementation of the Common European Asylum System’. European Union, Bruxelles. Retrieved 8 May 2017 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/556953/IPOL_STU(2016)556953_EN.pdf Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen, Pollack, Mark A. and Young, Alasdair R. (eds) (2014), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitefield, S. and Rohrschneider, R. (2017), ‘Reshaping European Party competition. The impact of integration on left and right’. Paper presented at the Global Governance Conference, May 18–19, Florence.Google Scholar
Zincone, G. and Di Gregorio, L. (2002), ‘Il processo delle politiche di immigrazione in Italia: uno schema interpretativo integrato’, Stato e mercato 66(3): 433–466.Google Scholar
Zincone, G., Penninx, R. and Borkert, M. (2011), Migration Policymaking in Europe. The Dynamics of Actors and Contexts in Past and Present, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar