Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:38:29.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTERESSE PER LA POLITICA, APPARTENENZA DI COALIZIONE E GIUDIZIO SUI LEADER: GLI EFFETTI DELLA CAMPAGNA ELETTORALE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Mauro Barisione

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Si sa che ogni elezione ha una storia a sé, fatta di un groviglio di fattori che concorrono a definirne l'esito. Così, i fattori di lungo periodo legati per esempio alla geografia elettorale o alle appartenenze sociali si attorcigliano con i fattori congiunturali, quali la strategia comunicativa di una coalizione o l'immagine di un leader politico. Di elezione in elezione, uno degli interrogativi più appassionanti che il ricercatore si possa porre riguarda proprio i rapporti di forza fra i fattori di lungo e di breve periodo, fra «struttura» e «congiuntura», fra continuità e cambiamento nella spiegazione del voto.

Summary

Summary

Starting from an analysis of the relationship between cognitive variables (such as the «level of interest in politics»), political variables (the degree of «coalition belonging») and evaluative-affective variables (in particular: individual evaluations of political leaders), this article explores the perception that different segments of the electorate had of Silvio Berlusconi and of his centre-left opponent Francesco Rutelli. More precisely, the analysis first focuses on the degree of popularity of the two candidates and then on the voters' opinions of their personal and political qualities. These two aspects of the candidate evaluation process are taken into account both in relational and diachronic terms. Indeed, the relational analysis concerns the judgments of more and less «sophisticated», more and less ideological, more and less independent voters. Special attention is given to the concept of «coalition belonging» that applies the classic notion of partisanship to the new main cleavage in Italian electoral politics: Ulivo (centre-left coalition) versus Casa delle libertà (centre-right coalition). The diachronic analysis, on the other hand, monitors the evolution of voters' attitudes towards the candidates and identifies four main effects of the electoral campaign: a strong «polarisation» effect, inducing voters to realign along ideological (centre-left vs. centre-right) lines; an «involvement gap» effect, in which more sophisticated voters are more strongly «aligned» with their respective coalitions; a «vedette» effect, in which the two candidates receiving the highest amounts of media exposure gradually increase their degree of popularity; and - with an apparent paradox - a «disenchantment» effect, related to a significant deterioration in the perception of the candidates' moral and political qualities.

Type
Numero speciale: LE ELEZIONI DEL 13 MAGGIO 2001 ElL SISTEMA POLITICO ITALIANO
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , December 2001 , pp. 503 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Barisione, M. (2001a), Elettori indecisi, elettori fluttuanti: che volto hanno i «bilancieri» del voto? I casi italiano e francese, in «Rivista italiana di scienza politica», n. 1, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar
Barisione, M. (2001b), Gli effetti delle comunicazioni politiche di massa sul voto: un panorama delle ricerche, in Sani, G. (a cura di), Mass Media ed elezioni, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Barisione, M. (2001c), La percezione dei candidati-premier e l'effetto leadership sul voto, paper presentato a Siena per il convegno annuale della Società italiana di scienza politica.Google Scholar
Barisione, M. e Mannheimer, R. (1999), Il metodo dell'intervista nella ricerca politica, in Trentini, G. (a cura di), Oltre l'intervista: il colloquio nei contesti sociali, Torino, Isedi-Utet, pp. 368–389.Google Scholar
Bean, C. e Mughan, A. (1989), Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain, in «American Political Science Review», n. 83, pp. 1165–79.Google Scholar
Blondiaux, L. (1996), Mort et résurrection de l'électeur rationnel, in «Revue Française de Science Politique», n. 46, pp. 753–791.Google Scholar
Calise, M. (2000), Il partito personale, Roma, Laterza.Google Scholar
Campus, D. (2000), L'elettore pigro. Informazione politica e scelte di voto, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cayrol, R. (1997), Médias et démocratic: la dérive, Paris, Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. (1989), Constructing the Political Spectacle, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Just, M., Crigler, A., Alger, D., Cook, T., Kern, M. e West, D. (1996), Crosstalk. Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keeter, S. (1987), The Illusion of Intimacy: Television and the Role of Candidate Personal Qualities on Voter Choice, in «Public Opinion Quarterly», 51, pp. 344–358.Google Scholar
Lang, G. e Lang, K. (1983), The Battle for Public Opinion: the President, the Press and the Polls during Watergate, New York, Columbia.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B. e Gaudet, H. (1948), The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. e Smith, J. (1981), The Influence of Self-Schemata on the Perception of Others, in Cantor, N. e Kihlstrom, J. (a cura di), Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum University Press, pp. 233–262.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1985), No Sense of Place: the Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tichenor, P., Donohue, G. e Olien, C. (1970), Mass Media and the Differential Growth in Knowledge, in «Public Opinion Quarterly», n. 54, pp. 158–170.Google Scholar
Rahn, W., Aldrich, J., Borgida, E. e Sullivan, D. (1990), A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal, in Ferejohn, J. e Kuklinski, J. (a cura di), Information and Democratic Processes, Urbana and Chicago, University of Illinois Press, pp. 136–159.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P., Brody, R. e Tetlock, P. (1991), Reasoning and Choice. Explorations in Political Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar