No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2016
Modern scientific archaeology in the Near East began with Heinrich Schliemann's excavations at Hissarlik on the Asiatic shore of the Dardanelles, undertaken in the belief that the site of the Hellenistic and Roman town ‘New Ilion’ was also the site of Homer's ‘Troy’. His conviction that the city of Priam which Agamemnon burned was the second from the bottom in the sequence of nine major deposits, because that ‘Second City’ had also perished by fire, was replaced, immediately after his death in 1890, by the probability that the Sixth City, the importance of which he had overlooked, corresponded far more closely in date and character with the conditions of a Trojan War at the traditional date, about 1200 B.C.; and had in fact some intercourse with the peoples of the south Aegean during the late Minoan decline. But, this point gained, the excavation of Hissarlik was left unfinished, and the definitive publication of it, and of the Schliemann Collection in Berlin (both in 1902), showed, all too clearly, how much was still unknown, especially as to the date and character of the Sixth City.
This summary was prepared for a meeting of the Architectural Association. It owes many of its facts to earlier retrospects: Kurt Bittel, Prähistorische Forschungen in Kleinasien (Istanbul, 1934); A. Götze, Kulturgeschichte des alten Orients (München, 1933), and Götze, The Present State of Anatolian and Hittite Studies (The Haverford Symposium, 1938), which are fully documented. But for inferences and interpretations the present writer alone is responsible.
page 71 note 2 Chantre, , Mission en Cappadoce, 1898 Google Scholar.
page 71 note 3 First described by Pinches in 1882 ( P.S.B.A. IV. II ff., 28 ffGoogle Scholar.).
page 71 note 4 Körte, A., Ath. Mitth. XXIV (1899), 1 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 71 note 5 Demangel, , Le Tumulus dit du Protésilas, 1926 Google Scholar.
page 71 note 6 Wright, , The Empire of the Hittites, 1884 Google Scholar; Sayce, , P.S.B.A. 1876 Google Scholar.
page 72 note 1 CR. Acad. Inscr. 1900, 269 Google Scholar; 1901, 90.
page 72 note 2 Ormerod, , B.S.A. XVI. 94 (1909)Google Scholar; XVIII. 80 (1911).
page 72 note 3 Schede, , A.Jahrb. 1929, Anz. 362Google Scholar.
page 72 note 4 A.J.A. XXXIX (1935). 33 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 72 note 5 Full publication in the press.
page 73 note 1 Osten, Von Den, Excav. at Aliṣar Höyük, 1938 Google Scholar.
page 73 note 2 Exc. at Thermi, 1936.
page 73 note 3 CR. Acad. Inscr. 1931, 270 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 73 note 4 A.J.A. since 1932.
page 73 note 5 Türk Tarih Kurumu 11, 1934, 1 ff., 307 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 73 note 6 Koṣay, Hamit and Arik, , Les Fouüles d'Alaça-Hüyük, 1935 Google Scholar.
page 73 note 7 M.D.O.G. 1937, 75 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 74 note 1 Excavations at Thermi in Lesbos, 1936.
page 76 note 1 Who viere the Greeks? 1927, 52, 230 Google Scholar.
page 87 note 1 Myres, , Who viere the Greeks? 1930, 594, notes 155, 157Google Scholar.
page 88 note 1 Türk Tarih, &c. III, 1936, 3 ffGoogle Scholar.