Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:09:52.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Major and Minor Turkic Language Islands in Iran with a Special Focus on Khalaj

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Elisabetta Ragagnin
Elisabetta Ragagnin*
Affiliation:
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This contribution offers a presentation of Turkic languages in Iran with special focus on Khalaj, a non-Oghuzic language spoken in the Markazī province. Attention is paid to features induced by contact with Iranian languages in particular with regard to the anaphoric pronominal stem bilä-, necessity constructions and the multifunctionality of ki/ke, providing new data on Khalaj and offering significant insights for further research.

Keywords

Turkic LinguisticsLanguage ContactIran-TurkicKhalajEndangered LanguagesAnaphoric PronounsNecessity ConstructionsSubordinationFocus and Emphatic Particles
Type
Turkic language islands and language contact with Turkic languages
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 3-4: Commemorating Ehsan Yarshater Endangered Iranian Languages: Language Contact and Language Islands in Iran , August 2020 , pp. 573 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ağcagül, Sevgi. “Nișāṭī’s Şühedānāme: A Further Source for the türkī-yi cacemī.” In Otto Spies Memorial Series, ed. Conermann, Stephan and Şen, Gül, Berlin: EB-V (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Amirpur-Ahrandjani, Manutschehr. Der aserbaidschanische Dialekt von Schahpur. Phonologie und Morphologie (Islamkundliche Untersuchungen 11). Freiburg: Schwarz, 1971.Google Scholar
Azmun, Yusuf. “Iran Türkmencesi. Bir Yomut ağzı: Arzuv.” Journal of Turkish Studies 2 (1978): 1–46.Google Scholar
Bodrogligeti, András. “On the Turkish Vocabulary of the Iṣfahān Anonymous.” Acta Orientalia Hungarica 21 (1968): 15–43.Google Scholar
Bosnalı, Sonel. “The Khalaj People and Their Language.” In Tehlikedeki Türk Dilleri II A: Örnek Çalışmalar/Endangered Turkic Languages II A: Case Studies, ed. Eker, Süer and Çelik Şavk, Ülkü, 271–292. Ankara: International Turkic Academy and Akhmet Yassawi International Turkish-Kazakh University, 2016.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane. “Iranian Influences in Sonqor Turkic.” In Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion: Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, ed. Csató, Éva Á., Isaksson, Bo, and Jahani, Carina, 241–269. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane. “Pronominal Systems in the Transitional Varieties of the Turkic Dialects in East Anatolia, Iraq and Western Iran.” In Studies in Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference in Turkish Linguistics, August 16–18, 2000, ed. Özsoy, Sumru, 321–335. Istanbul: Boğazıcı University, 2003.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane. “The Turkic Varieties of Iran.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective (The World of Linguistics 6), ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 398–444. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulut, Christiane. “Turkic Varieties in West Iran and Iraq: Representatives of a South Oghuz Dialect Group?” In Turkic Language in Iran: Past and Present (Turcologica 100), ed. Stein, Heidi, 15–99. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2014.Google Scholar
Caferoğlu, Ahmet, and Doerfer, Gerhard. “Das Aserbaidschanische.” In Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta I, ed. Deny, Jean, Grønbech, Kaare, Scheel, Helmuth, and Velidi Togan, Zeki, 280–307. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1959.Google Scholar
Dankoff, Robert and James, Kelly, eds. and translators. Compendium of the Turkic dialects, by Mahmūd al-Kāshgharī I (Sources of Oriental Languages & Literatures 7, Turkish Sources VII/I). Duxbury, MA: Harvard University Printing Office, 1982.Google Scholar
Dehghani, Yavar. A Grammar of Iranian Azari: Including Comparisons with Persian (Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 30). Munich: Lincom, 2000.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. 4 vols. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1963–1975.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. Grammatik des Chaladsch (Turcologica 4). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1988.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Das Chorasantürkische.” Türk Dilleri Araşırmaları Yıllığı Belleten 25 (1977): 127-205.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Irano-Turkic.” In Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas (Turcologica 62), ed. Johanson, Lars and Bulut, Christiane, 93–113. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2006.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. Khalaj Materials. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. Lexik und Sprachgeographie des Chaladsch. 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1987.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Maḥmūd al-Kāşγarī, Arγu, Chaladsch.” Ural-altaische Jahrbücher Neue Folge 7 (1987): 105–114.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Materialien zu türk. h-.” Ural-altaische Jahrbücher Neue Folge 1 (1982): 93–141; 2 (1982): 138–68.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Oghusische Lehnwörter im Chaladsch.” Harvard Ukrainian Studies 3, no. 4 (1980): 189–204.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Tati Lehnwörter im Chaladsch.” In Iranica Varia: Papers in Honour of Professor Ehsan Yarshater (Acta Iranica 30), ed. Amin, D., Kasheff, M., and Shahbazi, A., 62–67. Leuven: Peeters, 1990.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Turkic Languages of Iran.” In The Turkic Languages, ed. Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva Á., 273–282. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Türkische Sprachen und Dialekte in Iran.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 87 (1997): 41–63.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard. “Ein türkischer Dialekt aus der Gegend von Hamadān.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36 (1982): 99–124.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, and Hesche, Wolfram. Chorasantürkisch: Wörterlisten, Kurzgrammatiken, Indices (Turcologica 16). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1993.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, and Hesche, Wolfram. Südogusische Materialien aus Afghanistan und Iran. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1989.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, and Hesche, Wolfram. Türkische Folklore-Texte aus Chorasan (Turcologica 38). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1998.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, and Tezcan, Semih. Folklore-Texte der Chaladsch (Turcologica 19). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1994.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, and Tezcan, Semih. Wörterbuch des Chaladsch (Dialekt von Charrab). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1980.Google Scholar
Doerfer, Gerhard, Hesche, Wolfram, and Ravanyar, Jamshid. Oghusica aus Iran. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1990.Google Scholar
Dolatkhah, Sohrab. A Collection of Qashqay Folktales (Transcription, Translation, Glossary). Charleston, SC: CreateSpace, 2015.Google Scholar
Dolatkhah, Sohrab. Le Qashqay: Langue turcique d’Iran. Paris: CreateSpace, 2016.Google Scholar
Dolatkhah, Sohrab. Qashqai Turkic: A Comprehensive Corpus-based Grammar (Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 91). Munich: Lincom, 2019.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel. A Grammar of Old Turkic (Handbook of Oriental Studies 8/3). Leiden: Brill, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandjei, Tourkhan. “Turkish in the Ṣafavid Court of Iṣfahān.” Turcica 23 (1992): 311–318. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/TURC.23.0.2014205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Peter B. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples (Turcologica 9). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1992.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “Code-copying in Irano-Turkic.” Language Sciences 20, no. 3 (1998): 325–337. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(98)00007-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars “A Grammar of the ‘lingua turcica agemica’”. In Studia Ottomanica. Festgabe für György Hazai zum 65. Geburtstag (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 47), ed. Kellner-Heinkele, Barbara and Zieme, Peter, 87–101. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1997.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “The History of Turkic.” In The Turkic Languages, ed. Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva Á., 81–125. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “Notes on Turkic Stance Particles.” In Areal, Typological and Historical Aspects of Siberian Turkic (Turcologica 94), ed. Erdal, Marcel, Nevskaya, Irina, and Menz, Astrid, 51–58. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “Pyramids of Spatial Relators in Northeastern Turkic and Its Neighbors.” In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Crosslinguistic Typology (Studies in Language Companion Series 126), ed. Suihkonen, Pirkko, Comrie, Bernard, and Solovyev, Valery, 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts. London: Curzon, 2002.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1992.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “On Turkic Transformativizers and Non-transformativers.” Turkic Languages 8 (2004): 179–189.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. “Tuwinische Postverbien und chaladschische Imperative.” In Roter Altai, gib Dein Echo! Festschrift für Erika Taube zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Oelschlägel, Anett C., Nentwig, Ingo, and Taube, Jakob, 183–186. Leipzig: Leipziger Univ.-Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. “Western Iran: Overview.” In The Languages and Linguistics of Western Asia: An Areal Perspective (The World of Linguistics 6), ed. Haig, Geoffrey and Khan, Geoffrey, 385–397. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kıral, Filiz. “Arġu-Halaç hipotezi üzerine bir not.” In Maḥmūd al-Kāşġarī’nin 1000: Doğum Yıldönümü dolayısıyla uluslararası Dīvānu Luġāti’t-Turk Sempozyumu, 5–7 Eylül 2008, İstanbul/The Dīvānu Luġāti’t-Turk International Symposium: In Commemoration of Maḥmūd al-Kāşġarī’s 1000th Birthday, 5th–7th September 2008, ed. Develi, Hayati, Kaçalin, Mustafa, Kıral, Filiz, Ölmez, Mehmet, and Çulha, Tülay, 415–424. Istanbul: Eren, 2011.Google Scholar
Kıral, Filiz. “Copied Relative Constructions in Khalaj.” In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Lincoln College, Oxford, August 12–14, 1998 (Turcologica 46), ed. Kerslake, Celia and Göksel, Aslı, 181–188. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2000.Google Scholar
Kıral, Filiz. Das gesprochene Aserbaidschanisch von Iran (Turcologica 43). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001.Google Scholar
Kıral, Filiz. “Reflections on -miš in Khalaj.” In Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24), ed. Johanson, Lars and Utas, Bo, 89–102. The Hague: de Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
Kıral, Filiz. “Weiteres zum Imperativ im Chaladsch.” Ural-altaische Jahrbücher Neue Folge 20 (2006): 183–198.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. A Grammar of Contemporary Persian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda, 1992.Google Scholar
Lee, Sooman N. A Grammar of Iranian Azerbaijani (Memoirs of the Altaic Society of Korea 4). Seoul: Thaehaksa, 2008.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ligeti, Louis. “Sur la langue des Afchars d'Afghanistan.” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 7, no. 2/3 (1957): 109–156.Google Scholar
Minorsky, Vladimir F. “The Turkish Dialect of the Khalaj.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies 10 (1940): 417–437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00087607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazari, Abdollah, and Routamaa, Judith. “The Iranian Turkmen Language from a Contact Linguistics Perspective.” Turkic Languages 16 (2012): 215–238.Google Scholar
Perry, John R. “The Historical Role of Turkish in Relation to Persian of Iran.” Iran and the Caucasus 5 (2001): 193–200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157338401X00224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John R. “Persian in the Safavid Period: Sketch for an Etat de Langue.” Pembroke Papers 4 (1996): 269–283.Google Scholar
Poceluevskij, Evgenij A. “Xorasano-tjurkskij jayzk.” In Jazyki mira: Tjurkskie Jazyki, ed. Tenišev, Ėdgem R. et al., 476–480. Biškek: Izdatel’skij Dom “Kyrgyzstan,” 1997.Google Scholar
Ragagnin, Elisabetta. Dukhan, a Turkic Variety of Northern Mongolia (Turcologica 76). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011.Google Scholar
Ragagnin, Elisabetta. “Some Notes on Turkic and Mongolic Elements in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic Varieties.” In Eine hundertblättrige Tulpe—Bir ṣadbarg lāla: Festgabe für Claus Schönig, ed. Hauenschild, Ingeborg, Kappler, Matthias, and Kellner-Heinkele, Barbara, 361–371. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragagnin, Elisabetta, Ağcagül, Sevgi, Lauenstein, Julia, and Shirinova, Lala. “On Some Neglected Functions of Oghuzic ki,” Turkologiya 5 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Rentzsch, Julian. Modality in the Turkic Languages: Form and Meaning from a Historical and Comparative Perspective (Studien zur Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur der Türkvölker 18). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ščerbak, Aleksandr M. “Xaladžskij jazyk.” In Jazyki mira: Tjurkskie Jazyki, ed. Tenišev, Ėdgem R. et al., 470–476. Biškek: Izdatel’skij Dom “Kyrgyzstan,” 1997.Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus. “Azerbaijanian. “ In The Turkic Languages, ed. Johanson, Lars and Csató, Éva Á., 248–260. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus. “Mongolian Loanwords in Oghuz as Indicators of Linguistic and Cultural Areas in Southwest Asia.” Turkic Languages 4, no. 2 (2000): 239–252.Google Scholar
Schönig, Claus. Mongolische Lehnwörter im Westoghusischen (Turcologica 47). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2000.Google Scholar
Širaliev, Mammadaga Š. Dialekty i govory azerbajdžanskogo jazyka. Baku: Ėlm, 1983.Google Scholar
Širaliev, Mammadaga Š., and Islamov, M.I. Azärbayǰan dilinin dialektoloži atlasï. Baku: Ėlm, 1990.Google Scholar
Širaliev, Mammadaga Š., and Sevortjan, Ėrvand V., eds. Grammatika azerbajdžanskogo jazyka (Fonetika, morfologija i sintaksis). Baku: Ėlm, 1971.Google Scholar
Sönmäz, Ișiq. Untersuchungen zu den aserbaidschanischen Dialekten von Qaradaġ, Muġan und Zäncan (Materialia Turcica, Beiheft 11). Göttingen: Pontus, 1998.Google Scholar
Stein, Heidi. “Ajem-Türkisch: Annäherung an eine historische Sprachform zwischen Osmanisch, Persisch und Osttürkisch.” Orientalia Suecana 54 (2005): 179–200.Google Scholar
Stein, Heidi. “Optativ versus voluntativ-Imperativ in irantürkischen Texten (15./16. Jh.).” In Turcology in Mainz/Turkologie in Mainz (Turcologica 82), ed. Boeschoten, Hendrik and Rentzsch, Julian, 239–255. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2010.Google Scholar
Stein, Heidi. “Persian Syntactic Influence on Irano-Turkic Texts (16th Century).” In Turks and Iranians: Interactions in Language and History (Turcologica 105), ed. Csató, Éva Á., Johanson, Lars, Róna-Tas, Andràs, and Utas, Bo, 173–184. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilo, Donald L. “On the Non-Persian Iranian Substratum of Azerbaijanian.” In Turks and Iranians: Interactions in Language and History (Turcologica 105), ed. Csató, Éva Á., Johanson, Lars, Róna-Tas, András, and Utas, Bo, 185–234. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilo, Donald L. “Phonological Systems in Contact in Iran and Transcaucasia.” In Persian Studies in North America: Studies in Honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery, ed. Marashi, Mehdi, 75–94. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks, 1994.Google Scholar
Tulu, Sultan. Chorasantürkische Materialien aus Kalât bei Esfarâyen (Islamkundliche Untersuchungen 128). Berlin: Schwarz, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulu, Sultan. “Horasan Türkleri ve Horasan Türkçesi.” In Tehlikedeki Türk Dilleri II A: Örnek Çalışmalar/Endangered Turkic Languages II A: Case Studies, ed. Eker, Süer and Çelik Şavk, Ülkü, 293–326. Ankara: International Turkic Academy and Akhmet Yassawi International Turkish-Kazakh University, 2016.Google Scholar