Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:47:47.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endangered Iranian Languages, Gholami Saloumeh (ed.), Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018, ISBN 978-3-9549-0329-0 (pbk), 122 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Mahrokh Shojaei*
Affiliation:
Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Mahrokh Shojaei 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benveniste, Émile.La construction passive du parfait transitif.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 48 (1952): 5262. Translated in his Problems in General Linguistics, pp. 153–61. Coral Gables, FL: University ofMiamiPress, 1971.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora.Evidential, Raised Possessor, and the Historical Source of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian.” Transactions of the Philological Society, 103, no. 1 (2005): 172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2004.00144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George.The Indo-Iranian Construction mana kṛtam.” Language 46 (1970): 112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad.Non-Canonical Subject Construction in Endangered Iranian Languages: Further Investigation into the Debates on the Genesis of Ergativity.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 940. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas.On the Origin of the Ergative Construction in Iranian: Evidence from Avestan.” In Ancient and Middle Iranian Studies: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference of Iranian Studies, Vienna, 18–22 September 2007, ed. Macuch, Maria, Weber, Dieter, and Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond, 99114. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas. Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion in Alt- und Mittel-Iranischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholami, Saloumeh.Pronominal Clitics in Zoroastrian Dari (Behdīnī) of Kerman.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 111122. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Obrtelová, Jaroslava, and Sohibnazarbekova, Raihon. “Steps Being Taken to Reverse Language Shift in the Wakhi Language in Tajikistan.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 93109. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods.Remarks on the Old Persian Verbal System.” Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 45 (1985): 211227.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods.Old Iranian.” In The Iranian Languages, ed. Windfuhr, Gernot, 43195. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods.Middle West Iranian.” In The Iranian Languages, ed. Windfuhr, Gernot, 196278. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald.Dikin Marāqei Tati of Alamut: An Undocumented Conservative Tati Language.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 4169. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Werner, Brigitte.Forms and Meanings of the Ezafe in Zazaki.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 7191. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar