No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Endangered Iranian Languages, Gholami Saloumeh (ed.), Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018, ISBN 978-3-9549-0329-0 (pbk), 122 pp.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Iranian Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 3-4: Commemorating Ehsan Yarshater Endangered Iranian Languages: Language Contact and Language Islands in Iran , August 2020 , pp. 668 - 673
- Copyright
- Copyright © Mahrokh Shojaei 2020
References
Benveniste, Émile. “La construction passive du parfait transitif.” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 48 (1952): 52–62. Translated in his Problems in General Linguistics, pp. 153–61. Coral Gables, FL: University ofMiamiPress, 1971.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. “Evidential, Raised Possessor, and the Historical Source of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian.” Transactions of the Philological Society, 103, no. 1 (2005): 1–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2004.00144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George. “The Indo-Iranian Construction mana kṛtam.” Language 46 (1970): 1–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. “Non-Canonical Subject Construction in Endangered Iranian Languages: Further Investigation into the Debates on the Genesis of Ergativity.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 9–40. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas. “On the Origin of the Ergative Construction in Iranian: Evidence from Avestan.” In Ancient and Middle Iranian Studies: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference of Iranian Studies, Vienna, 18–22 September 2007, ed. Macuch, Maria, Weber, Dieter, and Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond, 99–114. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas. Die Entwicklung der Ergativkonstruktion in Alt- und Mittel-Iranischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholami, Saloumeh. “Pronominal Clitics in Zoroastrian Dari (Behdīnī) of Kerman.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 111–122. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Obrtelová, Jaroslava, and Sohibnazarbekova, Raihon. “Steps Being Taken to Reverse Language Shift in the Wakhi Language in Tajikistan.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 93–109. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods. “Remarks on the Old Persian Verbal System.” Münchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 45 (1985): 211–227.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods. “Old Iranian.” In The Iranian Languages, ed. Windfuhr, Gernot, 43–195. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods. “Middle West Iranian.” In The Iranian Languages, ed. Windfuhr, Gernot, 196–278. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald. “Dikin Marāqei Tati of Alamut: An Undocumented Conservative Tati Language.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 41–69. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar
Werner, Brigitte. “Forms and Meanings of the Ezafe in Zazaki.” In Endangered Iranian Languages, ed. Gholami, Saloumeh, 71–91. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar