Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:24:34.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the Subject is the Object: Islamic Advice Literature Modes and the Treatment of Slavery in The Qābūs Nāmih and The Nasirean Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Amin Azad Sadr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the difference of perspective which informs The Qābūs Nāmih’s and The Nasirean Ethics’ respective treatments of the topic of slavery. While in various parts of their discussions both works show an engagement with each side of the hybrid status of a slave’s existence as both subject and object, The Qābūs Nāmih deals with the issue almost entirely in terms of the slave’s status as an object, while The Nasirean Ethics engages this issue with clear acknowledgments to his/her status as a subject. It is possible that the divergent approaches of these two works are a reflection of the two distinct modes of the genre of Islamic advice literature in which they were respectively written.

Keywords

SlaveryIslamic advice literatureQābūs NāmihNasirean Ethics
Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , May 2016 , pp. 435 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algar, Hamid. “BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI VI. Regulations Governing Slavery in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Encyclopædia Iranica. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1988.Google Scholar
Amirsoleimani, Soheila. “Of This World and the Next: Metaphors and Meanings in the Qābūs-Nāmah.” Iranian Studies 35, no. i–iii (2002): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00210860208702009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badavī, Amin ‘Abd al-Majīd. Bahs darbāri-yi qābūs nāmih [Discussing The Qābūs Nāmih]. Tehran: Chāp Khānih-yi Ātashkadih, 1956.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. “BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI III. In the Islamic Period up to the Mongol Invasion.” Encyclopædia Iranica. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. “BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI: V. Military Slavery in Islamic Iran.” Encyclopædia Iranica. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1988.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. “An Early Arabic Mirror for Princes: Tāhir Dhū l-Yamīnain’s Epistle to His Son ‘Abdallāh (206/821).” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 29, no. 1 (January 1970): 25–41.Google Scholar
Bosworth, C. E. “Mirrors for Princes and Manuals of Statecraft.” In Religion, Learning and Science in the ‘Abbasid Period, 165–167. The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brockopp, Jonathan E. “Slaves and Slavery.” Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Washington DC: Brill Online, 2014. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/entries/encyclopaedia-of-the-quran/slaves-and-slavery-SIM_00393.Google Scholar
Brunschvig, R. “ʿAbd.” Encyclopaedia of Islam. 2nd ed. Brill Online, 2014. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/abd-COM_0003.Google Scholar
Floor, Willem. “BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI IV. From the Mongols to the Abolition of Slavery.” Encyclopædia Iranica. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.Google Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. “Classical Arabic Wisdom Literature: Nature and Scope.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 101, no. 1 (Mar. 1981): 49–86.Google Scholar
Iskandar, Kaykāvūs Ibn. Kitāb-i nasīhatnāmih: maʻrūf bih qābūsnāmih [The book of advice: also known as The Qābus Nāmih]. Edited by Nafīsī, Sa’īd. Tehran: Furūghī, 1963.Google Scholar
Iskandar, Kaykāvūs Ibn. A Mirror for Princes: The Qābūs Nāma. Translated by Levy, Reuben. New York: Dutton, 1951.Google Scholar
Israeli, Md Shamoon. “Gleanings from the Qābūs Nāma.” Indo-Iranica, 20, no. iii (Sept. 1967): 12–17.Google Scholar
Lambton, A. K. S. “Islamic Mirrors for Princes.” In La Persia Nel Medioevo, 419–442. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1971.Google Scholar
Lambton, A. K. S. “Justice in the Medieval Persian Theory of Kingship.” Studia Islamica 17 (1962): 91–119. doi: 10.2307/1595003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Reuben. “A Mirror for Princes: The Qābūs-Nāma.” Journal of the Iran Society 1, no. 2 (Jan. 1951): 37–48.Google Scholar
Macuch, Maria. “BARDA and BARDA-DĀRI II. In the Sasanian Period.” Encyclopædia Iranica. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1988.Google Scholar
Marlow, Louise. “Advice and Advice Literature.” Edited by Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. Washington, DC: Brill Online, 2014. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/advice-and-advice-literature-COM_0026.Google Scholar
Meisami, Julie Scott. “Translator’s Introduction.” In The Sea of Previous Virtues: A Medieval Islamic Mirror for Princes, vii–xix. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Moayyad, Heshmat. “Some Remarks on the Nasirean Ethics by Nasīr al-Dīn Tūsī.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 32, no. 31 (Jul. 1972): 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John. “Justice of the Underprivileged: The Ombudsman Tradition of Iran.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37, no. 3 (Jul. 1978): 203–215. doi: 10.1086/372651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salik, Muhammad Tufail. “Ethics of Nasir al-Din Tusi.” Iqbal 18, no. iii (1971): 65–82.Google Scholar
Tūsī, Nāsir al-Dīn. Akhlāq-i nāsirī [The Nasirean Ethics]. Edited by Haydarī, ’Alī Rizā. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Khwārazmī, 1978.Google Scholar
Tūsī, Nāsir al-Din. The Nasirean Ethics. Translated by Wickens, G.M.. London: Allen and Unwin, 1964.Google Scholar