Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:43:25.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charity as a Means of Zoroastrian Self-Preservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Rashna Writer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zoroastrian theology's emphasis on living the good life; the encouragement to create material wealth with the accompanying social obligations to put it to good use, explains the immensely extensive welfare system put in place by the Parsi community in India. Following the Arab conquest of Iran, the diminution in numbers and stature of the Zoroastrians in the ancestral land and the subsequent Parsi settlement in India, meant the marginalization of a people whose forebears once ruled a mighty empire. Once the Parsis acquired financial success, they put in place a community-wide network of benevolent institutions. This was followed by extending a muscular benevolence to the Zoroastrians of Iran, which evolved into a highly structured undertaking to ensure the safeguarding of the community from virtual extinction. Thus, Zoroastrian philanthropy was as much a reaffirmation of religious traditions as it was a means of self-preservation.

Keywords

Zoroastrian PhilanthropySelf-help as Survival MechanismPreservation of Community IdentityMuscular BenevolenceWealth CreationWelfare InstitutionsMarginal Status
Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 117 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyce, Mary. “The Fire-Temples of Kerman.” Acta Orientalia XXX (1966): 51–72.Google Scholar
Boyce, Mary. “Manekji Limji Hataria in Iran.” In K. R. Cama Oriental Institute Golden Jubilee Volume. Bombay: K. R. Cama Oriental Institute, 1969: 19–31.Google Scholar
Boyce, Mary. Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Buch, M. A. Zoroastrian Ethics. Baroda: A. G. Widgery, 1919.Google Scholar
Choksy, J. K. “Despite Shāhs and Mollās: Minority Sociopolitics in Premodern and Modern Iran.” JAH 40, no. 2 (2006): 129–184.Google Scholar
Davoud, Poure. Introduction to the Holy Gathas. P. D. Marker Avestan Series, vol. 1. Bombay: Iranian Zoroastrian Anjuman/Iran League, 1927.Google Scholar
Desai, Shapur F. History of the Bombay Parsi Panchayat 1860–1960. Bombay: Trustees of the Bombay Parsi Panchayat, 1977.Google Scholar
Hataria, M. L. Ishar-i siyahat-i Iran. Bombay: published privately, 1865.Google Scholar
Hinnells, John R. “The Flowering of Zoroastrian Benevolence: Parsi Charity in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” In Papers in Honour of Professor Mary Boyce, Acta Iranica Bailey, H. W. et al., eds., 261–326. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar
Hinnells, John R. Zoroastrians in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar
Hinnells, John R. Zoroastrian and Parsi Studies: Selected Works of John R. Hinnells. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Insler, S. “The Gathas of Zarathustra.” Acta Iranica 8 (1975): 24–113.Google Scholar
Jhabvala, S. H. Man According to Zoroastrianism. Bombay: Trustees of the Bombay Parsi Panchayat, 1923.Google Scholar
Karaka, D. F. History of the Parsis. Vol. I. London: Macmillan, 1884.Google Scholar
Kotwal, F. M. and Boyd, J. W., ed. and trans. A Guide to the Zoroastrian Religion. Studies in World Religions 2. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kulke, Eckehard. The Parsees in India: A Minority as Agent of Social Change. Delhi: Vikas, 1978.Google Scholar
Reporter, Ardeshir. “The Educational Movement Among the Zoroastrians of Iran.” Iran League Quarterly 1, nos. 1–2 (April–July 1930): 75–81.Google Scholar
Shahrokh, Shahorkh and Writer, Rashna, trans. and ed. The Memoirs of Keikhosrow Shahrokh. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 1994.Google Scholar
Stonequist, E. V. The Marginal Man: A Study in the Subjective Aspects of Cultural Conflict. 2nd ed. New York: Anchor/Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar
Tavadia, J. C. “A Pahlavi Text on Communism, Pahlavi Rivayat Accompanying the Dātestān ī Dēnik.” In Dr. Modi Memorial Volume 478–487. Bombay: Fort Printing Press, 1930.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. 4th ed. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1947.Google Scholar
West, E. W., ed. Sacred Books of the East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1885.Google Scholar
Williams, A. V. The Pahlavi Rivāyat Accompanying the Dādestān ī Dēnīg Part II. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1990.Google Scholar
Writer, Rashna. Contemporary Zoroastrians: An Unstructured Nation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1994.Google Scholar
Yarshater, Ehsan, ed., Shaked, Shaul, trans. The Wisdom of the Sasanian Sages (Dēnkard VI). Persian Heritage Series No. 34. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Zaehner, R. C. The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism. New York: Putnam, 1961.Google Scholar