Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:11:17.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planting native trees to restore riparian forests increases biotic resistance to nonnative plant invasions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2021

Chad F. Hammer  and
John S. Gunn Open the ORCID record for John S. Gunn [Opens in a new window]
Chad F. Hammer
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA; current: W.A. Franke College of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
John S. Gunn*
Affiliation:
Research Assistant Professor, New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
*
Author for correspondence: John S. Gunn, New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA03824. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nonnative invasive plant species are a major cause of ecosystem degradation and impairment of ecosystem service benefits in the United States. Forested riparian areas provide many ecosystem service benefits and are vital to maintaining water quality of streams and rivers. These systems are also vulnerable to natural disturbances and invasion by nonnative plants. We assessed whether planting native trees on disturbed riparian sites may increase biotic resistance to invasive plant establishment in central Vermont in the northeastern United States. The density (stems per square meter) of invasive stems was higher in non-planted sites (x̄ = 4.1 stems m−2) compared with planted sites (x̄ = 1.3 stems m−2). More than 90% of the invasive plants were Japanese knotweed [Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr.; syn. Polygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zucc.]. There were no significant differences in total stem density of native vegetation between planted and non-planted sites. Other measured response variables such as native tree regeneration, species diversity, soil properties, and soil function showed no significant differences or trends in the paired riparian study sites. The results of this case study indicate that tree planting in disturbed riparian forest areas may assist conservation efforts by minimizing the risk of invasive plant colonization.

Keywords

Natural disturbancePolygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zuccreforestationrestoration
Type
Case Study
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 126 - 133
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: John Cardina, Ohio State University

References

Abgrall, C, Forey, E, Mignot, L, Chauvat, M (2018) Invasion by Fallopia japonica alters soil food webs through secondary metabolites. Soil Biol Biochem 127:100–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, DJ, Flecker, AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters: identifying the major factors that threaten destruction of riverine species and ecosystems. BioScience 43:32–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cygan, D (2018) Preventing the Spread of Japanese Knotweed (Reynoutria japonica): Best Management Practices. Concord, NH: New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets & Food. 17 p. https://www.agriculture.nh.gov/publications-forms/documents/japanese-knotweed-bmps.pdf. Accessed: April 22, 2021Google Scholar
Funk, JL, Cleland, EE, Suding, KN, Zavaleta, ES (2008) Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol Evol 23:695–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hale, R, Reich, P, Daniel, T, Lake, PS, Cavagnaro, TR (2018) Assessing changes in structural vegetation and soil properties following riparian restoration. Agric Ecosyst Environ 252:22–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, CF (2019) The Impacts of Terrestrial Invasive Plants on Streams and Natural and Restored Riparian Forests in Northern New England. MS thesis. Durham: University of New Hampshire. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1292 Google Scholar
Hood, GW, Naiman, RJ (2000) Vulnerability of riparian zones to invasion by exotic vascular plants. Plant Ecol 148:105–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazorchak, JM, Klemm, DJ, Peck, DV, eds (1998) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters. Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 309 pGoogle Scholar
Liendo, D, Biurrun, I, Campos, JA, Herrera, M, Loidi, J, García-Mijangos, I (2015) Invasion patterns in riparian habitats: the role of anthropogenic pressure in temperate streams. Plant Biosyst 149:289–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likens, GE, Bormann, FH, Johnson, NM, Fisher, DW, Pierce, RS (1970) Effects of forest cutting and herbicide treatment on nutrient budgets in the Hubbard Brook watershed-ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 40:23–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maron, J, Marler, M (2007) Native plant diversity resists invasion at both low and high resource levels. Ecology 88:2651–2661 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, RI, Motzkin, G, Foster, DR (2008) Assessing the influence of historical factors, contemporary processes, and environmental conditions on the distribution of invasive species. J Torrey Bot Soc 135:260–271 Google Scholar
McDonald, RI, Urban, DL (2006) Edge effects on species composition and exotic species abundance in the North Carolina Piedmont. Biol Invasions 8:1049–1060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murrell, C, Gerber, E, Krebs, C, Parepa, M, Schaffner, U, Bossdorf, O (2011) Invasive knotweed affects native plants through allelopathy. Am J Bot 98:38–43 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunez-Mir, GC, Liebhold, AM, Guo, Q, Brockerhoff, EG, Jo, I, Ordonez, K, Fei, S (2017) Biotic resistance to exotic invasions: its role in forest ecosystems, confounding artifacts, and future directions. Biol Invasions 19:3287–3299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, DM, Holmes, PM, Esler, KJ, Galatowitsch, SM, Stromberg, JC, Kirkman, SP, Pyšek, P, Hobbs, RJ (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib 13:126–139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, D, Yang, H, Guan, D, Yang, M, Wu, J, Yuan, F, Jin, C, Wang, A, Zhang, Y (2018) The effects of land use change on soil infiltration capacity in China: q meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 626:1394–1401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2014) Soil Survey Field and Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51, Version 2.0. Lincoln, NE: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 487 pGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2014) Soil Infiltration: Soil Health-Guide for Educators. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051576.pdf. Accessed: January 1, 2018Google Scholar
Vila, M, Weiner, J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pairwise experiments. Oikos 105:229–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, E, Hagan, JM, Siegel, D, Whitman, AA (2006) The effectiveness of different buffer widths for protecting headwater stream temperature in Maine. For Sci 52:221–231 Google Scholar