Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:28:09.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Jeffrey T. Checkel
Get access

Abstract

Why do agents comply with the norms embedded in regimes and international institutions? Scholars have proposed two competing answers to this compliance puzzle, one rationalist, the other constructivist. Rationalists emphasize coercion, cost/benefit calculations, and material incentives; constructivists stress social learning, socialization, and social norms. Both schools, however, explain important aspects of compliance. To build a bridge between them, I examine the role of argumentative persuasion and social learning. This makes explicit the theory of social choice and interaction implicit in many constructivist compliance studies, and it broadens rationalist arguments about the instrumental and noninstrumental processes through which actors comply. I argue that domestic politics—in particular, institutional and historical contexts—delimit the causal role of persuasion/social learning, thus helping both rationalists and constructivists to refine the scope of their compliance claims. To assess the plausibility of these arguments, I examine why states comply with new citizenship/membership norms promoted by European regional organizations.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 553 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel. 1991. Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and their Progress. In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 43–88. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1993. Institutions, Roles, and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3):271–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1999. Culture, Strategy, and Foreign Policy Change: Israel's Road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations 5 (1):5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basiuk, Victor. 2000. Ukraine: Toward a Viable National Ethos. In Ukraine: The Search for a National Identity, edited by Wolchik, Sharon L. and Zviglyanich, Volodymyr. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 1999. Condemned to Repetition? The Rise, Fall, and Reprise of Soviet-Russian Military Intervention, 1973–1996. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, Richard Ned, Stein, Janice Gross, and Weber, Steven. 2000. God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World. European Journal of International Relations 6 (1):43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 1998. Constructing Transnational Communities: Domestic Social Movements, International Media, and the Growth of NGO Support Networks. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Boston.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burakovsky, Aleksandr. 1999. Ukraine: Independence at a Price. Transitions 6 (January).Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall C. 1995. The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication. In Modern Political Economy, edited by Banks, Jeffrey and Hanushek, Eric, 216–67. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, Tiffany, and Gorchinskaya, Katya. 1998. Verdict Against Ukrainian Newspaper Threatens Press Freedom. RFE/RL Newsline (10 June).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2):175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1997. Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behavior and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2000a. Building New Identities? Debating Fundamental Rights in European Institutions. Working Paper 00/12. Oslo: ARENA/University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2000b. Compliance and Conditionality. Working Paper 00/18. Oslo: ARENA/University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2000c. Review of Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Comparative Political Studies 33 (10):1337–41.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. The Europeanization of Citizenship? In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, edited by Caporaso, James, Cowles, Maria, and Risse, Thomas, 180–97. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, Michael, and Kuklinski, James. 1997. Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):88–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., and Sproull, Lee S., eds. 1996. Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W. Jr 1996. How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4):451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W. Jr 2000. Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review 2 (1):65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and Peterson, Susan, eds. 2000. Transforming Political Institutions: A Comparative Study of the Sources and Consequences of Domestic Structural Change. Unpublished manuscript, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 1994. Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and Explanatory Report. Document H (94) 10, November. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 1997. European Convention on Nationality and Explanatory Report. Document DIR/JUR (97) 6, 14 May. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2000. 1st European Conference on Nationality, Trends, and Developments in National and International Law on Nationality (Strasbourg, 18 and 19 October 1999), Document CONF/NAT (99) PRO 1, 3 February. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M., Van de Kragt, Alphons J. C., and Orbell, John M.. 1988. Not Me or Thee but We: The Importance of Group Identity in Eliciting Cooperation in Dilemma Situations: Experimental Manipulations. Acta Psychologica 68(1–3):83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 1999. Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (3):456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1991. Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblee Constituante. In Rationality and Institutions, edited by Malnes, Raino and Underdal, Arild. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar, and Fossum, John Erik. 2000. Post-National Integration. In Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation?, edited by Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and Fossum, John Erik, 1–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1999a. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1999b. Norms, Heresthetics, and the End of the Cold War. Paper presented at a Research Workshop of the Program on New Approaches to Russian Security, May, Boston.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Andrew. 1998. State Learning and International Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3):577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Purpose of Force. Unpublished manuscript, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Roger. 1981. Improving Compliance with International Law. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (3):363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Gregory, and Farrell, Henry. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the “Construction” of Security in Post-Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3):505–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1998. The Decline of Sovereignty? Politics and Immigration Restriction in Liberal States. In Challenge to the Nation-State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States, edited by Joppke, Christian, 86–108. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Sheri, and Makarov, Denis. 1998. Changing Post-Totalitarian Values in Russia Through Public Deliberation Methodology. PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (4):775–81.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1979. Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison. In Diplomacy: New Approaches in Theory, History, and Policy, edited by Lauren, Paul. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and McKeown, Timothy. 1985. Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making. In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, edited by Coulam, Robert and Smith, Richard. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1998. A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate. American Journal of Political Science 42 (3):819–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gurowitz, Amy. 1999. Mobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants, and the Japanese State. World Politics 51 (3):413–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haacke, Juergen. 1996. Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-Reflection, Rational Argumentation. Millennium 25 (2):255–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1990. When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1998. Compliance with EU Directives: Insights from International Relations and Comparative Politics. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (March): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M., ed. 1992. Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1). Special issue.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1996. Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes. Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 177–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren. 1997. Domestic Responses to International Pressure: Human Rights in Authoritarian Chile. European Journal of International Relations 4 (December) :403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedstroem, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2):379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Lily. 1999. Ukraine's Human Rights Ombudsman in Tight Spot. RFE/RL Newsline (9 June).Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Kupchan, Charles. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3):283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick, and Nexon, Daniel. 1999. Relations Before States: Substance, Process, and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Christer. 1990. Communication in International Bargaining. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Charlotte, Kock, Christian, and Rorbech, Lone. 1998. Rhetoric that Shifts Votes: An Exploratory Study of Persuasion in Issue-Oriented Public Debates. Political Communication 15:283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Juergen. 1997a. From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology. European Law Journal 3 (September).Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Juergen. 1997b. Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving: European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4):609–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Zürn, Michael. 1999. The Study of Compliance: A Framework. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research 27th Joint Sessions of Workshops, March, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 1993. Is Talk Really Cheap: Prompting Conversation Between Critical Theory and Rational Choice. American Political Science Review 87 (1):74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1998a. Socialization in International Institutions: The ASEAN Regional Forum and IR Theory. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Emerging International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Region, May, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1998b. Identity, Social Influence, and Cooperation in International Institutions: China and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Boston.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration. World Politics 50 (2):266–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanstroom, Daniel. 1993. Wer Sind Wir Wieder? Laws of Asylum, Immigration, and Citizenship in the Struggle for the Soul of the New Germany. Yale Journal of International Law 18 (1):155–211.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1993. Coping with Terrorism: Norms and Internal Security in Germany and Japan. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., 265–95. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., eds. 1998. International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4). Special issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keal, Paul. 1983. Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kerremans, Bart. 1996. Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision Making in the European Union. Governance 9 (2):217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995a. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization 49 (3):451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie. 1995b. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie, and Lynch, Cecelia. 1998. Conflicted Constructivism? Positivist Leanings Versus Interpretivist Meanings. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, March, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey. 1998. The Importance of International Learning. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Boston.Google Scholar
Koalitionsvertrag, . 1998. Aufbruch und Erneuerung—Deutschlands Weg ins 21. Jahrhundert. Koalitionsvereinbarung zwischen der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands und Buendnis 90/Die Gruenen. Report, 20 October, Bonn.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? The Yale Law Journal 106 (8):2599–2659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korshak, Stefan, and Sych, Vitaliy. 1998. Ukrainians Support both Ukrainian and Russian Languages. RFE/RL Newsline (12 August).Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4):753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, Christine. 1997. Reforming Germany's Citizenship Law. Paper presented at the conference Managing Migration in the 21st Century, October, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Laba, Roman. 1996. How Yeltsin's Exploitation of Ethnic Nationalism Brought Down an Empire. Transitions 2 (12 January).Google Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2):279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Marc A., Young, Oran R., and Zürn, Michael. 1995. The Study of International Regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1 (3):267–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Is the “Hard Bargaining” Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 1999. State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan's Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, Ustina. 1996a. New Constitution Largely a Formality. Transitions 2 (6 September).Google Scholar
Markus, Ustina. 1996b. The Bilingualism Question in Belarus and Ukraine. Transitions 2 (29 November).Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy. 1999. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization 53 (1): 161–90.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sarah. 1998. Institutionalizing Political Parties and Competitive Elections in Post-Soviet Russia: The Case of Western NGOs and Local Political Entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Ideas, Culture, and Political Analysis workshop, May, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sarah E., and Glenn, John K.. 2000. Democracy Assistance and NGO Strategies in Post-Communist Societies. Working Paper Number 8. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. [1949] 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. Reprint, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Strang, David. 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society 22 (4):487–511.Google Scholar
Midgaard, Knut. 1983. Rules and Strategy in Negotiations: Notes on an Institutionalist and Intentionalist Approach. European Journal of Political Research 11 (2):151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgaard, Knut. 1993. On the Significance of Language and a Richer Concept of Rationality. In Strategi, Politisk Kommunikasjon og Forhandlinger, edited by Midgaard, Knut, 133–56. Oslo: Institutt for Statsvitenskap, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations 1 (2):157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation. International Organization 53 (2):267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Harald. 1993. The Internalization of Principles, Norms, and Rules by Governments: The Case of Security Regimes. In Regime Theory and International Relations, edited by Rittberger, Volker, 361–90. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A., eds. 1996. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4):479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, John M., Dawes, Robyn M., and Van de Kragt, Alphons J. C.. 1988. Explaining Discussion-Induced Cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5):811–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, John M., Dawes, Robyn M., and Van de Kragt, Alphons J. C.. 1990. The Limits of Multilateral Promising. Ethics 100 (3):616–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 1996. Deliberating Global Environmental Politics. Journal of Peace Research 33 (2):129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 1999. Persuasion, Frames, and Climate Change Norms. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, February, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 1993. The Dynamics of Persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45 (4):595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, Steven. 2000. Does International Law Matter in Preventing Ethnic Conflict? NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 32:591–698.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gregory. 1997. Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms. Mershon International Studies Review 41 (November):205–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4):555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Democratic Peace—Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument. European Journal of International Relations 1 (4):491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ron, James. 1997. Varying Methods of State Violence. International Organization 51 (2):275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998a. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998b. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J. 1993. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics: The Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 1999a. The Double Puzzle of Enlargement: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Decision to Expand to the East. Working Paper No. 15. Oslo: ARENA/University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 1999b. NATO Enlargement: A Constructivist Explanation. Security Studies 8 (2/3):198–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2000. International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment. European Journal of International Relations 6 (1):109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoppa, Leonard. 1999. The Social Context in Coercive International Bargaining. International Organization 53 (2):307–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P. 2000. Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, R. 1965. Assumptions about the Learning of Political Values. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 361:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. 1998. “We Are No Angels”: Realism, Rational Choice, and Rationality in Social Science. American Journal of Sociology 104 (3):722–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross. 1994. Political Learning by Doing: Gorbachev as Uncommitted Thinker and Motivated Learner. International Organization 48 (2):155–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank, eds. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2000. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1):97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. London: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
t'Hart, Paul, Stern, Eric K., and Sundelius, Bengt, eds. 1997. Beyond Groupthink: Political Group Dynamics and Foreign Policy-Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. 1999. The Helsinki Accords and Political Change in Eastern Europe. In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, edited by Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn, 205–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underdal, Arild. 1998. Explaining Compliance and Defection: Three Models. European Journal of International Relations 4 (1):5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Kragt, Alphons J. C., Orbell, John M., and Dawes, Robyn M.. 1983. The Minimal Contributing Set as a Solution to Public Goods Problems. American Political Science Review 77:112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hagen, Mark. 1995. Does Ukraine Have a History? Slavic Review 54 (fall):658–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1988. Economic Interdependence, Bargaining Power, and Political Influence. International Organization 42 (3):461–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 1995. Politics Beyond the State: Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. World Politics 47 (3):311–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (3):335–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 1998. ‘European’ Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-State. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. 1996. Ukrainian Nationalism in the 1990s: A Minority Faith. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 1998. Reality Check: Revising Theories of International Politics in Response to the End of the Cold War. World Politics 50 (4):650–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolchik, Sharon L., and Zviglyanich, Volodymyr, eds. 2000. Ukraine: The Search for a National Identity. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1979. Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William, ed. 1994. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip G., and Leippe, Michael R.. 1991. The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1997. Assessing State Preferences and Explaining Institutional Choice: The Case of Intra-German Trade. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1998a. The Rise of International Environmental Politics: A Review of Current Research. World Politics 50 (4):617–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1998b. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State? Working Paper No. 12/98. Bremen: Institute for Intercultural and International Studies, University of Bremen.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2000. Introduction—Law and Compliance at Different Levels. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, March, Los Angeles.Google Scholar